Darko Kosanović, Suzana Filipović, Isaak Trajković, Nina Obradović, Paul M. Brune, Gregory E. Hilmas, William G. Fahrenholtz
{"title":"Strength comparison for fully dense zirconium diboride ceramics tested by different methods","authors":"Darko Kosanović, Suzana Filipović, Isaak Trajković, Nina Obradović, Paul M. Brune, Gregory E. Hilmas, William G. Fahrenholtz","doi":"10.1111/ijac.14885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The strength of zirconium diboride ceramics was tested by three different methods, 3‐point flexure, 4‐point flexure, and compression. Nearly full‐density ceramics were obtained by hot pressing commercial ZrB<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> powder with the addition of .5 wt.% carbon as a sintering aid. The thermal properties and hardness were studied for ZrB<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> milled with ZrB<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> and WC media. Based on phase purity and higher thermal conductivity, ZrB<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> ceramics prepared from powders milled with ZrB<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> media were selected for mechanical property studies. The strength in 3‐point flexure was 546 ± 55 MPa. The flexure strength was 476 ± 41 MPa in 4‐point bending, which was ∼20% higher than the previously reported value of 398 MPa for ZrB<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> with similar grain sizes due to higher relative density and lower impurity contents. Compression testing was performed at room temperature, and the strength was 1110 ± 358 MPa. Finally, the fracture toughness of pure ZrB<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> ceramics was determined by the chevron‐notched beam method to be 3.6 ± .7 MPa m<jats:sup>1/2</jats:sup>. The strength and fracture toughness values are higher than those previously published for ZrB<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> ceramics and can be attributed to higher density and lower grain size. The strength‐limiting flaw sizes were comparable to the grain size, suggesting that porosity and impurity phases did not play a significant role in the strength of these ceramics.","PeriodicalId":13903,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.14885","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CERAMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The strength of zirconium diboride ceramics was tested by three different methods, 3‐point flexure, 4‐point flexure, and compression. Nearly full‐density ceramics were obtained by hot pressing commercial ZrB2 powder with the addition of .5 wt.% carbon as a sintering aid. The thermal properties and hardness were studied for ZrB2 milled with ZrB2 and WC media. Based on phase purity and higher thermal conductivity, ZrB2 ceramics prepared from powders milled with ZrB2 media were selected for mechanical property studies. The strength in 3‐point flexure was 546 ± 55 MPa. The flexure strength was 476 ± 41 MPa in 4‐point bending, which was ∼20% higher than the previously reported value of 398 MPa for ZrB2 with similar grain sizes due to higher relative density and lower impurity contents. Compression testing was performed at room temperature, and the strength was 1110 ± 358 MPa. Finally, the fracture toughness of pure ZrB2 ceramics was determined by the chevron‐notched beam method to be 3.6 ± .7 MPa m1/2. The strength and fracture toughness values are higher than those previously published for ZrB2 ceramics and can be attributed to higher density and lower grain size. The strength‐limiting flaw sizes were comparable to the grain size, suggesting that porosity and impurity phases did not play a significant role in the strength of these ceramics.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology publishes cutting edge applied research and development work focused on commercialization of engineered ceramics, products and processes. The publication also explores the barriers to commercialization, design and testing, environmental health issues, international standardization activities, databases, and cost models. Designed to get high quality information to end-users quickly, the peer process is led by an editorial board of experts from industry, government, and universities. Each issue focuses on a high-interest, high-impact topic plus includes a range of papers detailing applications of ceramics. Papers on all aspects of applied ceramics are welcome including those in the following areas:
Nanotechnology applications;
Ceramic Armor;
Ceramic and Technology for Energy Applications (e.g., Fuel Cells, Batteries, Solar, Thermoelectric, and HT Superconductors);
Ceramic Matrix Composites;
Functional Materials;
Thermal and Environmental Barrier Coatings;
Bioceramic Applications;
Green Manufacturing;
Ceramic Processing;
Glass Technology;
Fiber optics;
Ceramics in Environmental Applications;
Ceramics in Electronic, Photonic and Magnetic Applications;