Silver Armor Against Bacteria: A Battle of Antimicrobial Effectiveness

Alina Zaidi
{"title":"Silver Armor Against Bacteria: A Battle of Antimicrobial Effectiveness","authors":"Alina Zaidi","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.03.606483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For many farmers, there is a need to improve crop resistance to pathogenic organisms. The climate of Florida and hurricane-prone location promotes the spread of many crop pathogens making management difficult and expensive. Therefore, this study evaluates using a Do-It-Yourself, DIY, method to produce colloidal silver solutions that may be used as effective inhibitors of bacteria growth. The efficacy was compared across gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria species. Production of colloidal silver used an electric current from eight 9-volt batteries wired in series. The starting silver was a jewelry chain, approx. 98% silver, suspended in a container of distilled water. Treatment effects were compared to a commercially available silver solution (10K, ppm) as the positive control via the Kirby-Baur method. Each petri dish was divided into four quadrants, into which each had a treated cellulose square impregnated with a treatment solution. Treatments were: T1-10K ppm AgNp; T-2-5ppm AgNp, T3-3ppm AgNp; and positive control T4-blank water control. The dimensions of Zones of Clearance (ZOC) and the bacterial growth surrounding treated squares were analyzed. The experiment was replicated four times. Data analysis conducted using one-way ANOVA with post hoc separation of means using the T test and Tukeys HSD. The positive control solution was the most effective bactericide across all species, followed by Treatment-2 (5-ppm treatment), which caused ZOC in gram-negative species. Treatment-3, the 3ppm, did not significantly affect bacterial suppression, while activity at 5ppm suggests that simple home-based, DIY systems can produce low cost, bactericidal nano-silver solutions. In this experiment the bacterium that tested that is also beneficial to plants, R. rubrum, showed an increased tolerance to all silver treatments. Improving homemade, DIY, systems may provide low-cost treatment solutions against some bacteria species important to backyard agriculturists.","PeriodicalId":501341,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Plant Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Plant Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.03.606483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For many farmers, there is a need to improve crop resistance to pathogenic organisms. The climate of Florida and hurricane-prone location promotes the spread of many crop pathogens making management difficult and expensive. Therefore, this study evaluates using a Do-It-Yourself, DIY, method to produce colloidal silver solutions that may be used as effective inhibitors of bacteria growth. The efficacy was compared across gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria species. Production of colloidal silver used an electric current from eight 9-volt batteries wired in series. The starting silver was a jewelry chain, approx. 98% silver, suspended in a container of distilled water. Treatment effects were compared to a commercially available silver solution (10K, ppm) as the positive control via the Kirby-Baur method. Each petri dish was divided into four quadrants, into which each had a treated cellulose square impregnated with a treatment solution. Treatments were: T1-10K ppm AgNp; T-2-5ppm AgNp, T3-3ppm AgNp; and positive control T4-blank water control. The dimensions of Zones of Clearance (ZOC) and the bacterial growth surrounding treated squares were analyzed. The experiment was replicated four times. Data analysis conducted using one-way ANOVA with post hoc separation of means using the T test and Tukeys HSD. The positive control solution was the most effective bactericide across all species, followed by Treatment-2 (5-ppm treatment), which caused ZOC in gram-negative species. Treatment-3, the 3ppm, did not significantly affect bacterial suppression, while activity at 5ppm suggests that simple home-based, DIY systems can produce low cost, bactericidal nano-silver solutions. In this experiment the bacterium that tested that is also beneficial to plants, R. rubrum, showed an increased tolerance to all silver treatments. Improving homemade, DIY, systems may provide low-cost treatment solutions against some bacteria species important to backyard agriculturists.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
银甲抗菌:抗菌效果大比拼
对于许多农民来说,需要提高作物对病原生物的抵抗力。佛罗里达州的气候和多飓风的地理位置促进了许多作物病原体的传播,使管理变得困难和昂贵。因此,本研究评估了使用 DIY 方法生产胶体银溶液的情况,这种溶液可用作细菌生长的有效抑制剂。对革兰氏阴性和革兰氏阳性细菌的功效进行了比较。生产胶体银使用的电流来自 8 节串联的 9 伏电池。起始银是悬浮在蒸馏水容器中的珠宝链,含银量约为 98%。通过柯比-鲍尔法,将处理效果与作为阳性对照的市售银溶液(10K,ppm)进行比较。每个培养皿分为四个象限,每个象限都有一个浸渍了处理溶液的处理过的纤维素方块。处理方法为T1-10K ppm AgNp;T-2-5ppm AgNp;T3-3ppm AgNp;阳性对照 T4-空白水对照。分析了清除区(ZOC)的尺寸和处理方格周围的细菌生长情况。实验重复四次。数据分析采用单因素方差分析,并使用 T 检验和 Tukeys HSD 进行事后均值分离。在所有物种中,阳性对照溶液是最有效的杀菌剂,其次是处理-2(5ppm 处理),它对革兰氏阴性物种产生 ZOC。处理-3(3ppm)对细菌抑制没有明显影响,而 5ppm 的活性表明,简单的家庭 DIY 系统可以生产出低成本的杀菌纳米银溶液。在本实验中,被测试的对植物有益的细菌 R. rubrum 对所有银处理的耐受性都有所提高。改进自制的 DIY 系统可以提供低成本的处理方案,以对付对后院农业者很重要的一些细菌种类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrated Transcriptome and Metabolome Analyses Reveal the Mechanism Regulating Bulbil Initiation and Development in Cystopteris chinensis Directional Cell-to-cell Transport in Plant Roots Bundle sheath cell-dependent chloroplast movement in mesophyll cells of C4 plants analyzed using live leaf-section imaging Stigma longevity is not a major limiting factor in hybrid wheat seed production Genotype by environment interactions in gene regulation underlie the response to soil drying in the model grass Brachypodium distachyon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1