RIGHT SEPSIS CLASSIFICATION- MUST FOR ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP: A LONGITUDINAL OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

Jaideep Pilania, Prasan Kumar Panda, Ananya Das, Udit Chauhan, Ravi Kant
{"title":"RIGHT SEPSIS CLASSIFICATION- MUST FOR ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP: A LONGITUDINAL OBSERVATIONAL STUDY","authors":"Jaideep Pilania, Prasan Kumar Panda, Ananya Das, Udit Chauhan, Ravi Kant","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.07.24311603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\nBackground: Sepsis is a critical medical condition characterized by life-threatening organ dysfunction triggered by a dysregulated response to infection. It poses a substantial global health burden, with significant morbidity, mortality, and economic costs, particularly pronounced in low- and middle-income countries. Effective management of sepsis relies on early recognition and appropriate intervention, underscoring the importance of accurate classification to guide treatment decisions. Objective: This longitudinal observational study aimed to assess the distribution of sepsis categories and the use of empirical antibiotics classified by the WHO AWaRe system in a tertiary care hospital in Northern India. The study also aimed to highlight implications for antimicrobial stewardship by examining the use of AWaRe group antibiotics and their correlation with sepsis classifications. Methods: A total of 1867 patients admitted with suspected sepsis were screened, with 230 meeting inclusion criteria. Patients were categorized into different sepsis classes (Asepsis, Possible Sepsis, Probable Sepsis, Confirm Sepsis) and followed until discharge or Day-28. Descriptive statistical analysis was employed to assess sepsis categories and empirical antibiotic usage classified by Access, Watch, and Reserve categories according to the WHO AWaRe system. Results: Among the study cohort (mean age 40.70 +/- 14.49 years, 50.9% female), initial sepsis classification predominantly included Probable Sepsis (51.3%) and Possible Sepsis (35.7%), evolving to Asepsis (57.8%) upon final classification. Empirical antibiotic use showed a concerning predominance of Watch group antibiotics (92.5%), with Ceftriaxone (45.7%) and piperacillin-tazobactam (31.7%) being the most commonly prescribed. Conclusion: The dynamic nature of sepsis classification underscores the complexity of diagnosing and managing this condition. Accurate categorization is pivotal for clinical decision-making, optimizing antibiotic use, and combating antimicrobial resistance. The majority of the asepsis category was levelled as probable or possible sepsis and given antibiotics. The high reliance on Watch group antibiotics in empirical therapy signals a need for enhanced diagnostic strategies to refine treatment initiation, potentially reducing unnecessary antibiotic exposure. Future efforts should focus on establishing sepsis classification checklists and promoting adherence to antimicrobial stewardship principles to mitigate the global threat of antimicrobial resistance.","PeriodicalId":501556,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Systems and Quality Improvement","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Systems and Quality Improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.07.24311603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Sepsis is a critical medical condition characterized by life-threatening organ dysfunction triggered by a dysregulated response to infection. It poses a substantial global health burden, with significant morbidity, mortality, and economic costs, particularly pronounced in low- and middle-income countries. Effective management of sepsis relies on early recognition and appropriate intervention, underscoring the importance of accurate classification to guide treatment decisions. Objective: This longitudinal observational study aimed to assess the distribution of sepsis categories and the use of empirical antibiotics classified by the WHO AWaRe system in a tertiary care hospital in Northern India. The study also aimed to highlight implications for antimicrobial stewardship by examining the use of AWaRe group antibiotics and their correlation with sepsis classifications. Methods: A total of 1867 patients admitted with suspected sepsis were screened, with 230 meeting inclusion criteria. Patients were categorized into different sepsis classes (Asepsis, Possible Sepsis, Probable Sepsis, Confirm Sepsis) and followed until discharge or Day-28. Descriptive statistical analysis was employed to assess sepsis categories and empirical antibiotic usage classified by Access, Watch, and Reserve categories according to the WHO AWaRe system. Results: Among the study cohort (mean age 40.70 +/- 14.49 years, 50.9% female), initial sepsis classification predominantly included Probable Sepsis (51.3%) and Possible Sepsis (35.7%), evolving to Asepsis (57.8%) upon final classification. Empirical antibiotic use showed a concerning predominance of Watch group antibiotics (92.5%), with Ceftriaxone (45.7%) and piperacillin-tazobactam (31.7%) being the most commonly prescribed. Conclusion: The dynamic nature of sepsis classification underscores the complexity of diagnosing and managing this condition. Accurate categorization is pivotal for clinical decision-making, optimizing antibiotic use, and combating antimicrobial resistance. The majority of the asepsis category was levelled as probable or possible sepsis and given antibiotics. The high reliance on Watch group antibiotics in empirical therapy signals a need for enhanced diagnostic strategies to refine treatment initiation, potentially reducing unnecessary antibiotic exposure. Future efforts should focus on establishing sepsis classification checklists and promoting adherence to antimicrobial stewardship principles to mitigate the global threat of antimicrobial resistance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正确的败血症分类--抗菌药物管理的必备条件:一项纵向观察研究
摘要背景:败血症是一种危重症,其特点是对感染的反应失调引发器官功能障碍,危及生命。败血症给全球健康带来沉重负担,发病率、死亡率和经济成本都很高,在中低收入国家尤为突出。败血症的有效治疗有赖于早期识别和适当干预,这就强调了准确分类以指导治疗决策的重要性。研究目的这项纵向观察性研究旨在评估印度北部一家三级医院中败血症类别的分布情况以及根据世界卫生组织 AWaRe 系统分类的经验性抗生素的使用情况。研究还旨在通过考察 AWaRe 组抗生素的使用情况及其与败血症分类的相关性,强调抗菌药物管理的意义。研究方法共筛查了 1867 名疑似败血症入院患者,其中 230 人符合纳入标准。患者被分为不同的败血症等级(无菌、可能败血症、疑似败血症、确诊败血症),并随访至出院或第 28 天。根据世界卫生组织的 AWaRe 系统,采用描述性统计分析来评估败血症类别和经验性抗生素的使用情况,并按准入、观察和储备类别进行分类。结果在研究队列中(平均年龄 40.70 +/- 14.49 岁,50.9% 为女性),最初的败血症分类主要包括可能败血症(51.3%)和可能败血症(35.7%),最终分类为无菌败血症(57.8%)。经验性抗生素的使用情况显示,观察组抗生素占绝大多数(92.5%),其中头孢曲松(45.7%)和哌拉西林-他唑巴坦(31.7%)是最常用的处方药。结论败血症分类的动态性质凸显了诊断和管理这种疾病的复杂性。准确的分类对于临床决策、优化抗生素的使用和抗菌药耐药性的防治至关重要。大多数无菌病例被定为可能或可能的败血症,并给予抗生素治疗。在经验性治疗中对观察组抗生素的高度依赖表明,有必要加强诊断策略以完善治疗方案,从而减少不必要的抗生素接触。今后的工作重点应放在建立败血症分类核对表和促进对抗菌药物管理原则的遵守上,以减轻抗菌药物耐药性对全球的威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems on the Performance of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at Yumbe Regional referral hospital; A Pre-post quasi-experimental study design Plaintiff experiences of the medico-legal environment in Ireland “We’re here to help them if they want to come”: A qualitative exploration of hospital staff perceptions and experiences with outpatient non-attendance Improving Access and Efficiency of Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment Across Four Canadian Provinces: A Stepped-Wedge Trial I am a quarterback: A mixed methods study of death investigators' communication with family members of young sudden cardiac death victims from suspected heritable causes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1