Venting makes people prefer—and preferentially support—us over those we vent about

IF 3 1区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Evolution and Human Behavior Pub Date : 2024-08-03 DOI:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.106608
Jaimie Arona Krems , Laureon A. Merrie , Nina N. Rodriguez , Keelah E.G. Williams
{"title":"Venting makes people prefer—and preferentially support—us over those we vent about","authors":"Jaimie Arona Krems ,&nbsp;Laureon A. Merrie ,&nbsp;Nina N. Rodriguez ,&nbsp;Keelah E.G. Williams","doi":"10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.106608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>People vent, as when airing grievances about one mutual friend to another. Contrary to a Freudian account, such <em>social venting</em> does not alleviate anger. So, what function might it serve? That people bestow more and more likely support on relatively better-liked friends—support which is associated with greater health, happiness, and economic mobility—highlights a largely overlooked challenge in social groups: competing within the group for certain group members' affections and support. Social venting might be one effective tool for meeting this challenge. We test this—and also compare venting's efficacy with other forms of communication, including a well-studied tactic of partner competition (competitor derogation). In six experiments with U.S. CloudResearch participants (<em>N</em> = 1723), venting causes listeners (people vented to) to prefer venters over targets (people vented about) and to preferentially benefit better-liked venters over targets in a modified Dictator Game. By obscuring the venters' intent to aggress against the target, venting might communicate target-harming information in a way that buffers venters from being perceived unfavorably. Effective venting might thus manipulate listeners' attitudes and behavior in venters' favor.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55159,"journal":{"name":"Evolution and Human Behavior","volume":"45 5","pages":"Article 106608"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution and Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513824000849","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People vent, as when airing grievances about one mutual friend to another. Contrary to a Freudian account, such social venting does not alleviate anger. So, what function might it serve? That people bestow more and more likely support on relatively better-liked friends—support which is associated with greater health, happiness, and economic mobility—highlights a largely overlooked challenge in social groups: competing within the group for certain group members' affections and support. Social venting might be one effective tool for meeting this challenge. We test this—and also compare venting's efficacy with other forms of communication, including a well-studied tactic of partner competition (competitor derogation). In six experiments with U.S. CloudResearch participants (N = 1723), venting causes listeners (people vented to) to prefer venters over targets (people vented about) and to preferentially benefit better-liked venters over targets in a modified Dictator Game. By obscuring the venters' intent to aggress against the target, venting might communicate target-harming information in a way that buffers venters from being perceived unfavorably. Effective venting might thus manipulate listeners' attitudes and behavior in venters' favor.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发泄让人们更喜欢--更倾向于支持我们,而不是我们发泄的对象
人们会发泄,比如向另一个共同的朋友倾诉不满。与弗洛伊德的说法相反,这样做并不能缓解愤怒。那么,它能起到什么作用呢?人们对相对更喜欢的朋友给予更多和更可能的支持--这种支持与更大的健康、幸福和经济流动性相关--凸显了社会群体中一个被忽视的挑战:在群体中争夺某些群体成员的情感和支持。社交发泄可能是应对这一挑战的有效工具之一。我们检验了这一点,并比较了发泄与其他交流形式的功效,包括一种研究得很透彻的伙伴竞争策略(竞争者贬损)。在以美国云研究(CloudResearch)参与者(= 1723 人)为对象的六项实验中,发泄会使倾听者(被发泄者)更喜欢发泄者,而不是发泄对象(被发泄者),并且在修改后的独裁者游戏中,更喜欢发泄者,而不是发泄对象。通过掩盖发泄者攻击目标的意图,发泄可能会以一种缓冲的方式传达伤害目标的信息,从而避免发泄者被认为是不利的。因此,有效的发泄可能会操纵听众的态度和行为,使之有利于发泄者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evolution and Human Behavior
Evolution and Human Behavior 生物-行为科学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
62
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Evolution and Human Behavior is an interdisciplinary journal, presenting research reports and theory in which evolutionary perspectives are brought to bear on the study of human behavior. It is primarily a scientific journal, but submissions from scholars in the humanities are also encouraged. Papers reporting on theoretical and empirical work on other species will be welcome if their relevance to the human animal is apparent.
期刊最新文献
Genetic markers of cousin marriage and honour cultures Even small differences in attractiveness and formidability affect the probability and speed of selection: An online study and an offline replication Deep neural networks generate facial metrics that overcome limitations of previous methods and predict in-person attraction Sex differences in close friendships and social style Perceptions of facial trustworthiness and dominance modulate early neural responses to male facial sexual dimorphism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1