Ireland’s Role in British Colonial Capitalism: “Men of Capitals” and Pitt’s Irish Proposals, 1784–1785

IF 1.3 2区 历史学 Q3 BUSINESS Business History Review Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1017/s0007680524000187
Mary O’Sullivan
{"title":"Ireland’s Role in British Colonial Capitalism: “Men of Capitals” and Pitt’s Irish Proposals, 1784–1785","authors":"Mary O’Sullivan","doi":"10.1017/s0007680524000187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In April 1785, the British prime minister, William Pitt, proposed to give Ireland “compleat liberty and equality” with Britain “in matters of trade.” Historians cast the stakes around Pitt’s “Irish” proposals in terms of ideologies about trade, but this paper focuses on the concrete economic issues involved. It shows that Pitt’s proposals emerged from years of debates in which contemporaries conceived of the British Atlantic economy in terms of an integration of trade, shipping, and credit that evokes a British system of colonial capitalism. Ireland’s dependent relationship to that system, and the perceived failure of “free trade” to overcome its poverty, generated a battle among Irish “improvers” over rival plans to attract “men of capitals” to Ireland. Pitt played an important role in this fierce Irish debate by favoring one plan, but the British prime minister and his main Irish advisor, Thomas Orde, were never convinced by that plan’s logic of improvement, supporting it instead for fiscal reasons. That calculus made Pitt’s proposals vulnerable to attack from economic interests in Britain that took Ireland’s plans for economic improvement more seriously.</p>","PeriodicalId":9503,"journal":{"name":"Business History Review","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business History Review","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007680524000187","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In April 1785, the British prime minister, William Pitt, proposed to give Ireland “compleat liberty and equality” with Britain “in matters of trade.” Historians cast the stakes around Pitt’s “Irish” proposals in terms of ideologies about trade, but this paper focuses on the concrete economic issues involved. It shows that Pitt’s proposals emerged from years of debates in which contemporaries conceived of the British Atlantic economy in terms of an integration of trade, shipping, and credit that evokes a British system of colonial capitalism. Ireland’s dependent relationship to that system, and the perceived failure of “free trade” to overcome its poverty, generated a battle among Irish “improvers” over rival plans to attract “men of capitals” to Ireland. Pitt played an important role in this fierce Irish debate by favoring one plan, but the British prime minister and his main Irish advisor, Thomas Orde, were never convinced by that plan’s logic of improvement, supporting it instead for fiscal reasons. That calculus made Pitt’s proposals vulnerable to attack from economic interests in Britain that took Ireland’s plans for economic improvement more seriously.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
爱尔兰在英国殖民资本主义中的作用:"资本家 "与皮特的爱尔兰提案,1784-1785 年
1785 年 4 月,英国首相威廉-皮特提议在 "贸易事务 "上给予爱尔兰与英国 "完全的自由和平等"。历史学家从贸易意识形态的角度对皮特的 "爱尔兰 "建议进行了论证,但本文则关注其中涉及的具体经济问题。本文表明,皮特的提议是在多年的辩论中产生的,在辩论中,同时代的人们从贸易、航运和信贷一体化的角度来构想英国的大西洋经济,这让人联想到英国的殖民资本主义体系。爱尔兰对这一体系的依附关系,以及 "自由贸易 "在克服贫困方面的失败,引发了爱尔兰 "改良主义者 "之间对吸引 "资本家 "来爱尔兰的计划的争论。在这场激烈的爱尔兰争论中,皮特扮演了重要角色,他支持其中一项计划,但这位英国首相和他在爱尔兰的主要顾问托马斯-奥德(Thomas Orde)从未被该计划的改良逻辑所说服,而是出于财政原因支持了该计划。这种考虑使得皮特的建议很容易受到英国经济利益集团的攻击,因为这些利益集团更加重视爱尔兰的经济改善计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: The Business History Review is a quarterly publication of original research by historians, economists, sociologists, and scholars of business administration. BHR"s ongoing mission, from its 1926 inception as the Bulletin of the Business Historical Society, is to encourage and aid the study of the evolution of business in all periods and all countries. The Business History Review is published in the spring, summer, autumn, and winter by Harvard Business School and is printed at The Sheridan Press in Pennsylvania.
期刊最新文献
In the Zone: On Quinn Slobodian’s Crack-Up Capitalism and the Spaces of Political Economy Radical Mercantilism and Fascist Italy’s East African Empire A Reappraisal of Albert Aftalion’s Theory of Structural Transformation in an Era of Decarbonization Sedentary Merchant Triumphant: The Transformation of Venetian Trading Patterns in the Long Twelfth Century The Will to Chaos and Disorder: The Behemoth as a Model of Political Economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1