Executive functions in mid-life adults with mild sensorineural hearing loss compared with age-matched controls with normal hearing

Pooja Chandrashekar, Hema Nagaraj
{"title":"Executive functions in mid-life adults with mild sensorineural hearing loss compared with age-matched controls with normal hearing","authors":"Pooja Chandrashekar, Hema Nagaraj","doi":"10.1186/s43163-024-00630-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores the relationship between sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in mid-life adults and cognitive function, focusing on executive functions. Given the projected rise in dementia cases, identifying modifiable risk factors for cognitive decline is imperative. SNHL has emerged as a potential risk factor, with hearing loss accounting for a substantial portion of dementia cases. However, the cognitive implications of SNHL in mid-life adults are not well understood. The study examined 50 participants, 25 with bilateral unaided mild SNHL (AHL) and 25 with normal hearing (ANH). A battery of audiological assessments and cognitive tests, including the Trail Making Test (TMT), was administered. TMT measures included direct scores (completion time and errors) and derived scores (difference, ratio, proportion, sum, and multiplication scores). The AHL group displayed significantly poorer peripheral hearing compared to the ANH group, as reflected in pure-tone audiometry, speech reception thresholds, and speech identification scores. Significant differences were observed in all direct and derived TMT measures except for the ratio and proportion scores. This suggests that while overall cognitive disturbances were evident in the AHL group, they were not exclusive to executive function deficits. Notably, we did not identify any statistically significant effects of hypertension, diabetes, smoking, alcohol consumption, or physical activity on TMT scores. This study highlights the potential impact of SNHL on cognitive function in mid-life adults. Mid-life SNHL is associated with cognitive differences, emphasizing its role as a modifiable risk factor for future cognitive decline. This research underlines the need for further investigation into the cognitive effects of aided hearing and a multidisciplinary approach to understanding these alterations in cognitive function.","PeriodicalId":501131,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-024-00630-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in mid-life adults and cognitive function, focusing on executive functions. Given the projected rise in dementia cases, identifying modifiable risk factors for cognitive decline is imperative. SNHL has emerged as a potential risk factor, with hearing loss accounting for a substantial portion of dementia cases. However, the cognitive implications of SNHL in mid-life adults are not well understood. The study examined 50 participants, 25 with bilateral unaided mild SNHL (AHL) and 25 with normal hearing (ANH). A battery of audiological assessments and cognitive tests, including the Trail Making Test (TMT), was administered. TMT measures included direct scores (completion time and errors) and derived scores (difference, ratio, proportion, sum, and multiplication scores). The AHL group displayed significantly poorer peripheral hearing compared to the ANH group, as reflected in pure-tone audiometry, speech reception thresholds, and speech identification scores. Significant differences were observed in all direct and derived TMT measures except for the ratio and proportion scores. This suggests that while overall cognitive disturbances were evident in the AHL group, they were not exclusive to executive function deficits. Notably, we did not identify any statistically significant effects of hypertension, diabetes, smoking, alcohol consumption, or physical activity on TMT scores. This study highlights the potential impact of SNHL on cognitive function in mid-life adults. Mid-life SNHL is associated with cognitive differences, emphasizing its role as a modifiable risk factor for future cognitive decline. This research underlines the need for further investigation into the cognitive effects of aided hearing and a multidisciplinary approach to understanding these alterations in cognitive function.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轻度感音神经性听力损失的中年人与听力正常的年龄匹配对照组的执行功能比较
本研究探讨了中年人感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)与认知功能之间的关系,重点关注执行功能。鉴于痴呆症病例预计会增加,确定认知功能下降的可改变风险因素势在必行。SNHL已成为一个潜在的风险因素,听力损失占痴呆症病例的很大一部分。然而,SNHL 对中年人认知能力的影响还不甚了解。这项研究对 50 名参与者进行了调查,其中 25 人患有双侧无助轻度 SNHL(AHL),25 人听力正常(ANH)。研究人员对他们进行了一系列听力评估和认知测试,包括 "走小路测试"(TMT)。TMT 测量包括直接得分(完成时间和错误)和推导得分(差异、比率、比例、总和和乘法得分)。与 ANH 组相比,AHL 组的外周听力明显较差,这反映在纯音测听、言语接收阈值和言语识别得分上。除比率和比例得分外,所有直接和衍生的 TMT 测量结果均存在显著差异。这表明,虽然 AHL 组存在明显的整体认知障碍,但这些障碍并不局限于执行功能缺陷。值得注意的是,我们没有发现高血压、糖尿病、吸烟、饮酒或体育锻炼对 TMT 分数有任何统计学意义上的影响。本研究强调了中年SNHL对认知功能的潜在影响。中年SNHL与认知差异有关,强调了其作为未来认知能力下降的可调节风险因素的作用。这项研究强调,有必要进一步调查辅助听力对认知的影响,并采用多学科方法来了解认知功能的这些改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Betahistine in the treatment of peripheral vertigo: an evidence-based review Age as an important variable that affects auditory and language results after cochlear implant Vocal dysfunction following thyroid surgery: a multidimensional subjective and objective study Dysgeusia and paresthesia following suspension microlaryngoscopy: review and recommendations for risk reduction A study of borderline cases of velopharyngeal insufficiency using cephalometry and nasofibroscopy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1