Undergraduate Nursing Faculty Knowledge, Beliefs, and Experiences with Teaching LGBTQ+ Content: A Scoping Review

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Professional Nursing Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1016/j.profnurs.2024.07.010
Caitlin M. Nye, Jennifer A. Livingston, Kelly Foltz-Ramos, Amy Hequembourg
{"title":"Undergraduate Nursing Faculty Knowledge, Beliefs, and Experiences with Teaching LGBTQ+ Content: A Scoping Review","authors":"Caitlin M. Nye,&nbsp;Jennifer A. Livingston,&nbsp;Kelly Foltz-Ramos,&nbsp;Amy Hequembourg","doi":"10.1016/j.profnurs.2024.07.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Nursing education research about inclusion of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) health content in undergraduate nursing curricula primarily focuses on student learning outcomes. There is less research evidence about the experiences of nursing faculty with teaching LGBTQ+ health topics.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this scoping review was to identify current evidence about pre-licensure, undergraduate nursing faculty knowledge, beliefs, and experiences with teaching LGBTQ+ content.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Six EBSCO databases were searched for manuscripts published between 2012 and 2023. Peer-reviewed articles, published in English, describing studies of pre-licensure, undergraduate nursing faculty knowledge, beliefs, and experiences with teaching LGBTQ+ health content were included. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews was used to guide inclusion of studies for review.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The literature search yielded 612 results, of which 58 were selected for full text screening. Twelve total studies were retained for this scoping review.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Faculty knowledge related to LGBTQ+ health is framed by a “deficit narrative,” emphasizing physical and mental health risks and negative outcomes. Faculty beliefs are often measured with instruments that reflect cisnormativity or heteronormativity. There is an ongoing need to research the experiences of inclusion of LGBTQ+ content by pre-licensure, undergraduate nursing faculty.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Professional Nursing","volume":"54 ","pages":"Pages 205-215"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Professional Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755722324001236","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Nursing education research about inclusion of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) health content in undergraduate nursing curricula primarily focuses on student learning outcomes. There is less research evidence about the experiences of nursing faculty with teaching LGBTQ+ health topics.

Purpose

The purpose of this scoping review was to identify current evidence about pre-licensure, undergraduate nursing faculty knowledge, beliefs, and experiences with teaching LGBTQ+ content.

Methods

Six EBSCO databases were searched for manuscripts published between 2012 and 2023. Peer-reviewed articles, published in English, describing studies of pre-licensure, undergraduate nursing faculty knowledge, beliefs, and experiences with teaching LGBTQ+ health content were included. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews was used to guide inclusion of studies for review.

Results

The literature search yielded 612 results, of which 58 were selected for full text screening. Twelve total studies were retained for this scoping review.

Conclusions

Faculty knowledge related to LGBTQ+ health is framed by a “deficit narrative,” emphasizing physical and mental health risks and negative outcomes. Faculty beliefs are often measured with instruments that reflect cisnormativity or heteronormativity. There is an ongoing need to research the experiences of inclusion of LGBTQ+ content by pre-licensure, undergraduate nursing faculty.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本科护理学院教师对 LGBTQ+ 内容教学的认识、信念和经验:范围审查
有关在本科护理课程中纳入女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性者和同性恋(LGBTQ+)健康内容的护理教育研究主要关注学生的学习成果。有关护理教师教授 LGBTQ+ 健康主题的经验的研究证据较少。本范围综述的目的是确定目前有关执照前本科护理教师教授 LGBTQ+ 内容的知识、信念和经验的证据。我们在六个 EBSCO 数据库中检索了 2012 年至 2023 年间发表的手稿。收录了以英语发表的同行评审文章,这些文章描述了执照前本科护理教师对教授 LGBTQ+ 健康内容的知识、信念和经验的研究。系统综述和元分析的首选报告项目 (PRISMA) 扩展用于范围界定综述,用于指导纳入综述的研究。文献检索产生了 612 项结果,其中 58 项被选中进行全文筛选。本次范围界定综述共保留了 12 项研究。与 LGBTQ+ 健康相关的教职员工知识以 "赤字叙事 "为框架,强调身心健康风险和负面结果。教职员工的信念通常是通过反映顺反规范性或异性恋规范性的工具来衡量的。有必要对执照前本科护理教师纳入 LGBTQ+ 内容的经验进行持续研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal will accept articles that focus on baccalaureate and higher degree nursing education, educational research, policy related to education, and education and practice partnerships. Reports of original work, research, reviews, insightful descriptions, and policy papers focusing on baccalaureate and graduate nursing education will be published.
期刊最新文献
Nursing students' personality traits, sleep quality, social media addiction, and academic performance: A multi-site structural equation model analysis Comparing characteristics of underrepresented versus majority student groups enrolled in US nursing programs Using data to drive programmatic change: Recalculating NCLEX-RN success Expanding clinical placement opportunities: Exploring night shift experiences for nursing students Newly graduated and nurse resident competencies: Perceptions of nurse faculty and acute care hospital leaders in the state of Maryland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1