Evaluation of the shear bond strength between CAD/CAM blocks and sonic/thermoviscous bulk-fill composites with different surface treatments

IF 3.2 3区 材料科学 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.103805
{"title":"Evaluation of the shear bond strength between CAD/CAM blocks and sonic/thermoviscous bulk-fill composites with different surface treatments","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.103805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of nanoceramic hybrid CAD/CAM blocks with two bulk-fill composites in deep margin elevation following different surface pretreatments.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Forty cylindrical-shaped samples (3 mm diameter × 4 mm height) were prepared from each group of bulk-fill resin composites (BRC) (SonicFill 3/SF, VisCalor bulk/VS), and 80 samples (14.5 mm × 7.2 mm × 2 mm) were sectioned from Grandio Block. Specimens of each BRC were assigned to two subgroups, and surfaces of one group were treated with a tribochemical silica-coating. The CAD/CAM block sample surfaces were treated with Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> particles. CAD/CAM block and composite samples were luted using dual-cure universal resin-based cement (Bifix QM). Following immersion in distilled water for 24 h, the samples were divided as immediate and test groups. The test group was subjected to thermocycle (5–55 °C, 10,000 cycles). The SBS of the resin-based cement between the blocks and BRC was tested on a universal testing device until failure. Failure type was determined using a stereomicroscope. The roughening pattern was evaluated with SEM. Statistical analysis included Shapiro Wilk, Generalized Linear Models, and Fisher's Exact tests (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No statistically significant difference was found between the mean SBS values according to deep margin elevation materials and surface pretreatment (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). Aging procedure resulted in a statistically significant difference between the mean SBS values (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). While the mean SBS value was 33.7 ± 7.9 MPa in immediate group, it was calculated as 22.6 ± 6.3 MPa in test group following thermocycle.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In terms of SBS, both bulk-fill resin composites performed similarly. Although higher SBS values were obtained with tribochemical silica-coating, the adverse effects of thermocycling on bonding could not be prevented.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13732,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143749624001878","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/purpose

To evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of nanoceramic hybrid CAD/CAM blocks with two bulk-fill composites in deep margin elevation following different surface pretreatments.

Materials and methods

Forty cylindrical-shaped samples (3 mm diameter × 4 mm height) were prepared from each group of bulk-fill resin composites (BRC) (SonicFill 3/SF, VisCalor bulk/VS), and 80 samples (14.5 mm × 7.2 mm × 2 mm) were sectioned from Grandio Block. Specimens of each BRC were assigned to two subgroups, and surfaces of one group were treated with a tribochemical silica-coating. The CAD/CAM block sample surfaces were treated with Al2O3 particles. CAD/CAM block and composite samples were luted using dual-cure universal resin-based cement (Bifix QM). Following immersion in distilled water for 24 h, the samples were divided as immediate and test groups. The test group was subjected to thermocycle (5–55 °C, 10,000 cycles). The SBS of the resin-based cement between the blocks and BRC was tested on a universal testing device until failure. Failure type was determined using a stereomicroscope. The roughening pattern was evaluated with SEM. Statistical analysis included Shapiro Wilk, Generalized Linear Models, and Fisher's Exact tests (P < 0.05).

Results

No statistically significant difference was found between the mean SBS values according to deep margin elevation materials and surface pretreatment (P > 0.05). Aging procedure resulted in a statistically significant difference between the mean SBS values (P < 0.001). While the mean SBS value was 33.7 ± 7.9 MPa in immediate group, it was calculated as 22.6 ± 6.3 MPa in test group following thermocycle.

Conclusion

In terms of SBS, both bulk-fill resin composites performed similarly. Although higher SBS values were obtained with tribochemical silica-coating, the adverse effects of thermocycling on bonding could not be prevented.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估不同表面处理的 CAD/CAM 块与声波/热粘散装填充复合材料之间的剪切粘接强度
评估纳米陶瓷混合 CAD/CAM 块体与两种大量填充复合材料在不同表面预处理后的深边缘隆起剪切粘接强度(SBS)。从每组团状填充树脂复合材料(BRC)(SonicFill 3/SF、VisCalor bulk/VS)中制备 40 个圆柱形样品(直径 3 毫米×高 4 毫米),从 Grandio Block 中切分 80 个样品(14.5 毫米×7.2 毫米×2 毫米)。每个 BRC 样品被分成两组,其中一组的表面经过摩擦化学二氧化硅涂层处理。CAD/CAM 块样本表面用氧化铝颗粒处理。使用双固化通用树脂基水泥(Bifix QM)对 CAD/CAM 块和复合材料样品进行砌筑。在蒸馏水中浸泡 24 小时后,样品被分为直接组和测试组。测试组进行热循环(5-55 °C,10,000 次循环)。砌块和 BRC 之间树脂基水泥的 SBS 在通用测试装置上进行测试,直至失效。使用体视显微镜确定失效类型。用扫描电子显微镜对粗糙模式进行评估。统计分析包括 Shapiro Wilk 检验、广义线性模型检验和费雪精确检验(0.05)。老化过程导致平均 SBS 值之间存在显著的统计学差异 ( < 0.001)。即时组的平均 SBS 值为 33.7 ± 7.9 兆帕,而热循环后测试组的平均 SBS 值为 22.6 ± 6.3 兆帕。就 SBS 值而言,两种填充树脂复合材料的表现相似。虽然摩擦化学二氧化硅涂层获得了更高的 SBS 值,但热循环对粘合的不利影响无法避免。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives
International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
200
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives draws together the many aspects of the science and technology of adhesive materials, from fundamental research and development work to industrial applications. Subject areas covered include: interfacial interactions, surface chemistry, methods of testing, accumulation of test data on physical and mechanical properties, environmental effects, new adhesive materials, sealants, design of bonded joints, and manufacturing technology.
期刊最新文献
Effect of glass-ceramic thickness on the degree of conversion, polymerization shrinkage stress, and bond strength of resin cements 30-Month performance of a 10-MDP based universal adhesive system under mechanical and biological perspectives Preparation and characterization of UV-Curable phosphate ester-containing acrylate resin adhesive for dental zirconia restorations Strength improvement and failure analysis of dissimilar FDM printed single-lap joints with tailored interface geometry Creep damage laws for bonded joints under pure mode II loading
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1