Improving smallholders' capacity building by creating an enabling environment for sustainable crop production

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agricultural Systems Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104083
Yajuan Li , Xinxin Zhang , Qianni Huang , Donasius Pathera , Zhichao An , Xiaoqiang Jiao , Fusuo Zhang
{"title":"Improving smallholders' capacity building by creating an enabling environment for sustainable crop production","authors":"Yajuan Li ,&nbsp;Xinxin Zhang ,&nbsp;Qianni Huang ,&nbsp;Donasius Pathera ,&nbsp;Zhichao An ,&nbsp;Xiaoqiang Jiao ,&nbsp;Fusuo Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><p>Sustainably improving food production to meet the needs of a growing population necessitates a dual-pronged approach involving both top-down policy support from governments and grassroots support from social organizations. The combination of these two elements can yield comprehensive and systematic solutions for sustainable crop production, particularly in smallholder-dominated agriculture. However, integrating these approaches to empower smallholders with advanced agricultural technologies and enhance crop sustainability remains a subject that warrants further investigation.</p></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVES</h3><p>We explored collaborative practices for the integration of resources using a dual-pronged approach to empower smallholders for sustainable crop production.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>The DPSIR framework was applied to our case study. Using stratified and random sampling, 258 farmers were recruited from Quzhou, China. We divided the participants into three groups: six farmers who had worked with China-founded Science and Technology backyards (STBs) for 15 years as leading farmers (LF), 90 neighboring farmers (NF) who were closely related to LF, and 162 traditional farmers (TF) from three villages in Quzhou who were not related to STBs. An intervention experiment focusing on the LF and NF was conducted. Interviews were conducted with 258 farmers after harvesting wheat. In addition, we used statistical analyses to examine the differences in yield and economic and environmental benefits among the different groups. Multiple linear regression was used to determine how different factors affected wheat yield, net profit, and technology adoption. We used a mediation model to analyze the mechanisms by which enabling environmental creation affects sustainable production by empowering farmers.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>Compared to TF, LF and NF increased social value by 31% and 25%, technology trust by 16% and 5%, and willingness to accept green production technologies and adoption behavior by 20% and 21%, respectively. In addition, LF and NF achieved wheat yield increases accompanied by net profit gains of 86% and 13%, respectively, and LF demonstrated 53% and 52% reductions in nitrogen surplus compared to TF and NF, respectively. The study found that the synergy of social organizations and government support promoted farmers' knowledge generation and sustainable agricultural production by increasing their social value and technology trust.</p></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><p>This study underscores the pivotal role of STBs in bridging these two approaches and facilitating an environment that empowers smallholders for sustainable crop production. This study provides initial insights into a multi-actor, co-participation-based approach to promoting farmers' capacity, which provides important information for future agricultural policy development and implementation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 104083"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002336","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT

Sustainably improving food production to meet the needs of a growing population necessitates a dual-pronged approach involving both top-down policy support from governments and grassroots support from social organizations. The combination of these two elements can yield comprehensive and systematic solutions for sustainable crop production, particularly in smallholder-dominated agriculture. However, integrating these approaches to empower smallholders with advanced agricultural technologies and enhance crop sustainability remains a subject that warrants further investigation.

OBJECTIVES

We explored collaborative practices for the integration of resources using a dual-pronged approach to empower smallholders for sustainable crop production.

METHODS

The DPSIR framework was applied to our case study. Using stratified and random sampling, 258 farmers were recruited from Quzhou, China. We divided the participants into three groups: six farmers who had worked with China-founded Science and Technology backyards (STBs) for 15 years as leading farmers (LF), 90 neighboring farmers (NF) who were closely related to LF, and 162 traditional farmers (TF) from three villages in Quzhou who were not related to STBs. An intervention experiment focusing on the LF and NF was conducted. Interviews were conducted with 258 farmers after harvesting wheat. In addition, we used statistical analyses to examine the differences in yield and economic and environmental benefits among the different groups. Multiple linear regression was used to determine how different factors affected wheat yield, net profit, and technology adoption. We used a mediation model to analyze the mechanisms by which enabling environmental creation affects sustainable production by empowering farmers.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Compared to TF, LF and NF increased social value by 31% and 25%, technology trust by 16% and 5%, and willingness to accept green production technologies and adoption behavior by 20% and 21%, respectively. In addition, LF and NF achieved wheat yield increases accompanied by net profit gains of 86% and 13%, respectively, and LF demonstrated 53% and 52% reductions in nitrogen surplus compared to TF and NF, respectively. The study found that the synergy of social organizations and government support promoted farmers' knowledge generation and sustainable agricultural production by increasing their social value and technology trust.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study underscores the pivotal role of STBs in bridging these two approaches and facilitating an environment that empowers smallholders for sustainable crop production. This study provides initial insights into a multi-actor, co-participation-based approach to promoting farmers' capacity, which provides important information for future agricultural policy development and implementation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过创造有利于可持续作物生产的环境,加强小农的能力建设
可持续地提高粮食产量以满足不断增长的人口的需求,需要双管齐下,既要有政府自上而下的政策支持,也要有社会组织的基层支持。这两个要素的结合可以产生全面、系统的可持续作物生产解决方案,特别是在以小农为主的农业领域。然而,如何整合这些方法,使小农获得先进的农业技术并提高作物的可持续性,仍然是一个值得进一步研究的课题。我们探索了利用双管齐下的方法整合资源的合作实践,以增强小农的能力,促进可持续作物生产。我们的案例研究采用了 DPSIR 框架。通过分层随机抽样,我们从中国衢州招募了 258 名农民。我们将参与者分为三组:6 位与中国创办的科技后园(STB)合作了 15 年的带头农户(LF)、90 位与 LF 关系密切的周边农户(NF)以及来自衢州三个村庄的 162 位与 STB 无关的传统农户(TF)。针对 LF 和 NF 开展了一项干预试验。我们在小麦收割后对 258 位农民进行了访谈。此外,我们还使用了统计分析来研究不同组别在产量、经济和环境效益方面的差异。我们使用多元线性回归来确定不同因素对小麦产量、净利润和技术采用的影响。我们使用中介模型分析了通过增强农民能力创造有利环境对可持续生产产生影响的机制。与 TF 相比,LF 和 NF 的社会价值分别提高了 31% 和 25%,技术信任度分别提高了 16% 和 5%,接受绿色生产技术的意愿和采用行为分别提高了 20% 和 21%。此外,与 TF 和 NF 相比,LF 和 NF 在实现小麦增产的同时,还分别实现了 86% 和 13% 的净利润收益,LF 的氮盈余分别减少了 53% 和 52%。研究发现,社会组织和政府支持的协同作用通过提高农民的社会价值和技术信任度,促进了农民的知识创造和可持续农业生产。这项研究强调了科技机构在这两种方法之间的桥梁作用,以及为小农户创造一个有利于可持续作物生产的环境所发挥的关键作用。本研究为促进农民能力的多方参与式方法提供了初步见解,为未来农业政策的制定和实施提供了重要信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
期刊最新文献
Lowering the greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions from grassland-based dairy production The dairy production system in the north of Sweden under possible future food scenarios A pathway for decreasing the water footprint from grazing-based beef production systems in the Tropics How to use residual biomass streams in circular food systems to minimise land use or GHG emissions Win-win or lose-win? Economic-climatic synergies and trade-offs in dual-purpose cattle systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1