Changes in metacognitions and executive functions during mindfulness and acceptance-based intervention among individuals with anxiety disorders: A randomized waitlist-controlled trial

IF 3.4 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100818
Reza Didehban , Mehdi Zemestani , Gordon J. G. Asmundson , Jafar Bakhshaie
{"title":"Changes in metacognitions and executive functions during mindfulness and acceptance-based intervention among individuals with anxiety disorders: A randomized waitlist-controlled trial","authors":"Reza Didehban ,&nbsp;Mehdi Zemestani ,&nbsp;Gordon J. G. Asmundson ,&nbsp;Jafar Bakhshaie","doi":"10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>This study illustrates how mindfulness and acceptance-based intervention (MABI) can change metacognitions and executive functions among individuals with anxiety disorders.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Forty-five Iranian individuals (mean [SD] age, 24.60 [4.94] years; 51.1 % female) with comorbid anxiety disorders participated in a randomized, waitlist-controlled trial of weekly group sessions of either MABI or waitlist control (WLC). Primary and process of change outcomes were assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and 1-month follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Significant changes were observed over time on anxiety symptoms (Cohen <em>d</em> = 1.04, 95% CI [0.40 ± 1.65]), as well as on metacognitive beliefs (Cohen <em>d</em> = 1.04, 95% CI [0.40 ± 1.64]), executive functions (Cohen <em>d</em> = 0.91, 95% CI [0.28 ± 1.51]), and mindfulness facets (Cohen d = 0.97, 95% CI [0.34 ± 1.58]), in favor of MABI over WLC.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Overall, findings add to the knowledge in the field and provide cross-cultural evidence in support of MABIs as interventions that target anxiety symptoms, metacognitive beliefs and executive functions in a non-Western culture.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 100818"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221214472400098X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This study illustrates how mindfulness and acceptance-based intervention (MABI) can change metacognitions and executive functions among individuals with anxiety disorders.

Methods

Forty-five Iranian individuals (mean [SD] age, 24.60 [4.94] years; 51.1 % female) with comorbid anxiety disorders participated in a randomized, waitlist-controlled trial of weekly group sessions of either MABI or waitlist control (WLC). Primary and process of change outcomes were assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and 1-month follow-up.

Results

Significant changes were observed over time on anxiety symptoms (Cohen d = 1.04, 95% CI [0.40 ± 1.65]), as well as on metacognitive beliefs (Cohen d = 1.04, 95% CI [0.40 ± 1.64]), executive functions (Cohen d = 0.91, 95% CI [0.28 ± 1.51]), and mindfulness facets (Cohen d = 0.97, 95% CI [0.34 ± 1.58]), in favor of MABI over WLC.

Conclusions

Overall, findings add to the knowledge in the field and provide cross-cultural evidence in support of MABIs as interventions that target anxiety symptoms, metacognitive beliefs and executive functions in a non-Western culture.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
焦虑症患者在接受正念干预期间元认知和执行功能的变化:随机等待对照试验
本研究阐述了正念和接受式干预(MABI)如何改变焦虑症患者的元认知和执行功能。45 名合并有焦虑症的伊朗人(平均 [SD] 年龄为 24.60 [4.94] 岁;51.1% 为女性)参加了每周一次的 MABI 或候补对照(WLC)小组课程的随机候补对照试验。在基线、干预后和 1 个月的随访中对主要结果和变化过程进行了评估。随着时间的推移,焦虑症状(Cohen = 1.04,95% CI [0.40±1.65])以及元认知信念(Cohen = 1.04,95% CI [0.40±1.64])、执行功能(Cohen = 0.91,95% CI [0.28±1.51])和正念方面(Cohen d = 0.97,95% CI [0.34±1.58])都发生了显著变化,MABI 比 WLC 更受青睐。总之,研究结果丰富了该领域的知识,并提供了跨文化证据,支持人机对话疗法作为针对非西方文化中焦虑症状、元认知信念和执行功能的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
18.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science is the official journal of the Association for Contextual Behavioral Science (ACBS). Contextual Behavioral Science is a systematic and pragmatic approach to the understanding of behavior, the solution of human problems, and the promotion of human growth and development. Contextual Behavioral Science uses functional principles and theories to analyze and modify action embedded in its historical and situational context. The goal is to predict and influence behavior, with precision, scope, and depth, across all behavioral domains and all levels of analysis, so as to help create a behavioral science that is more adequate to the challenge of the human condition.
期刊最新文献
Feasibility of a brief, remote self-compassion intervention for employed mothers Exploring the interconnectedness of depression, anxiety, diabetes distress, and related psychosocial factors in adults with type 2 diabetes: A network analysis Effects of a randomized controlled trial of mobile app-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on depressive symptoms and process variables in college students - Focusing on the mediating effects of acceptance and cognitive defusion- Changes in university students’ behaviour and study burnout risk during ACT-based online course intervention: A mixed methods study Third wave interventions for adolescents with mental health disorders: A systematic review with meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1