Elucidating the process-based emphasis in cognitive behavioral therapy

IF 3.4 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100819
Truls Ryum , Nikolaos Kazantzis
{"title":"Elucidating the process-based emphasis in cognitive behavioral therapy","authors":"Truls Ryum ,&nbsp;Nikolaos Kazantzis","doi":"10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper delves into the examination of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), a therapeutic modality reliant on both longitudinal and cross-sectional biopsychosocial data regarding the client, through the lens of evolutionary language within a process-based therapy (PBT) framework. The exposition commences with an elucidation and delineation of pivotal features and assumptions underpinning CBT, encompassing its philosophical foundations, postulated change processes, and the empirical research substantiating these processes. We posit ideas for clinicians to enhance their case formulation by incorporating process-based principles into CBT, invoking concepts such as variation, selection, retention, and contextual fit. Furthermore, we offer a case illustration and a treatment plan utilizing a network-based approach. In conclusion, we explore potential strengths, barriers, and future trajectories for PBT. Although CBT has predominantly undergone scrutiny as a treatment protocol in group-level outcome studies, we assert that CBT inherently operates as a process-driven model, as evidenced by established metrics assessing therapist competence in its implementation. Specifically, we illustrate how the judicious selection and utilization of specific procedures (techniques) targeting change processes emanate from an individualized and integrative case formulation. This formulation is rooted in the evidence supporting the chosen procedure, aligned with the client's preferences and goals, and embedded within the in-session process of selecting, planning, and reviewing between-session homework. CBT, therefore, emerges as a model for clinical practice and training characterized by inherent pragmatism, integrativeness, and transtheoreticism. It aligns seamlessly with the emphasis on process-informed, person-centered, evidence-based treatment within the PBT framework.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 100819"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144724000991/pdfft?md5=09f67b1b5b1563e0da2860e38cd46631&pid=1-s2.0-S2212144724000991-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144724000991","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper delves into the examination of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), a therapeutic modality reliant on both longitudinal and cross-sectional biopsychosocial data regarding the client, through the lens of evolutionary language within a process-based therapy (PBT) framework. The exposition commences with an elucidation and delineation of pivotal features and assumptions underpinning CBT, encompassing its philosophical foundations, postulated change processes, and the empirical research substantiating these processes. We posit ideas for clinicians to enhance their case formulation by incorporating process-based principles into CBT, invoking concepts such as variation, selection, retention, and contextual fit. Furthermore, we offer a case illustration and a treatment plan utilizing a network-based approach. In conclusion, we explore potential strengths, barriers, and future trajectories for PBT. Although CBT has predominantly undergone scrutiny as a treatment protocol in group-level outcome studies, we assert that CBT inherently operates as a process-driven model, as evidenced by established metrics assessing therapist competence in its implementation. Specifically, we illustrate how the judicious selection and utilization of specific procedures (techniques) targeting change processes emanate from an individualized and integrative case formulation. This formulation is rooted in the evidence supporting the chosen procedure, aligned with the client's preferences and goals, and embedded within the in-session process of selecting, planning, and reviewing between-session homework. CBT, therefore, emerges as a model for clinical practice and training characterized by inherent pragmatism, integrativeness, and transtheoreticism. It aligns seamlessly with the emphasis on process-informed, person-centered, evidence-based treatment within the PBT framework.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阐明认知行为疗法中以过程为基础的重点
认知行为疗法(CBT)是一种依赖于客户纵向和横向生物心理社会数据的治疗方式,本文在基于过程的疗法(PBT)框架内,通过进化语言的视角,对认知行为疗法进行了深入研究。论述从阐明和界定 CBT 的关键特征和假设开始,包括其哲学基础、假定的改变过程以及证实这些过程的实证研究。我们为临床医生提出了一些想法,通过将基于过程的原则纳入 CBT,并援引变异、选择、保留和情境契合等概念,来增强他们的病例制定能力。此外,我们还利用基于网络的方法提供了一个案例说明和一个治疗计划。最后,我们探讨了 PBT 的潜在优势、障碍和未来发展轨迹。虽然 CBT 作为一种治疗方案在小组层面的结果研究中受到了广泛关注,但我们认为 CBT 本身就是一种过程驱动型模式,这一点可以从评估治疗师实施能力的既定指标中得到证明。具体来说,我们说明了针对改变过程的特定程序(技术)的明智选择和使用是如何产生于个性化和综合的病例制定。这种表述根植于支持所选程序的证据,与客户的偏好和目标相一致,并嵌入到会话过程中的选择、计划和会话间功课复习中。因此,CBT 成为一种临床实践和培训模式,其特点是固有的实用主义、整合性和跨理论主义。它与 PBT 框架中强调的过程知情、以人为本、循证治疗的理念不谋而合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
18.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science is the official journal of the Association for Contextual Behavioral Science (ACBS). Contextual Behavioral Science is a systematic and pragmatic approach to the understanding of behavior, the solution of human problems, and the promotion of human growth and development. Contextual Behavioral Science uses functional principles and theories to analyze and modify action embedded in its historical and situational context. The goal is to predict and influence behavior, with precision, scope, and depth, across all behavioral domains and all levels of analysis, so as to help create a behavioral science that is more adequate to the challenge of the human condition.
期刊最新文献
Feasibility of a brief, remote self-compassion intervention for employed mothers Exploring the interconnectedness of depression, anxiety, diabetes distress, and related psychosocial factors in adults with type 2 diabetes: A network analysis Effects of a randomized controlled trial of mobile app-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on depressive symptoms and process variables in college students - Focusing on the mediating effects of acceptance and cognitive defusion- Changes in university students’ behaviour and study burnout risk during ACT-based online course intervention: A mixed methods study Third wave interventions for adolescents with mental health disorders: A systematic review with meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1