Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Pathogens Isolated from Patients with Wound Infection at a Teaching Hospital in Vietnam

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infection and Drug Resistance Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.2147/idr.s472025
Nguyen Van An, Hoang Trung Kien, Le Huy Hoang, Nguyen Hung Cuong, Hoang Xuan Quang, Tuan Dinh Le, Ta Ba Thang, Tien Tran Viet, Luong Cong Thuc, Dinh Viet Hung, Nguyen Hoang Viet, Le Nhat Minh, Vu Huy Luong, Vinh Thi Ha Nguyen, Pham Quynh Hoa, Hai Ha Long Le
{"title":"Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Pathogens Isolated from Patients with Wound Infection at a Teaching Hospital in Vietnam","authors":"Nguyen Van An, Hoang Trung Kien, Le Huy Hoang, Nguyen Hung Cuong, Hoang Xuan Quang, Tuan Dinh Le, Ta Ba Thang, Tien Tran Viet, Luong Cong Thuc, Dinh Viet Hung, Nguyen Hoang Viet, Le Nhat Minh, Vu Huy Luong, Vinh Thi Ha Nguyen, Pham Quynh Hoa, Hai Ha Long Le","doi":"10.2147/idr.s472025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Purpose:</strong> At a teaching Hospital in Vietnam, the persistently high incidence of diagnosed wound infection poses ongoing challenges to treatment. This study seeks to explore the causative agents of wound infection and their antimicrobial and multidrug resistance patterns.<br/><strong>Methods:</strong> A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Microbiology, Military Hospital 103, Vietnam. Data on microorganisms that caused wound infection and their antimicrobial resistance patterns was recorded from hospitalized patients from 2014 to 2021. Using the chi-square test, we analyzed the initial isolation from wound infection specimens collected from individual patients.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> Over a third (34.9%) of wound infection samples yielded bacterial cultures. <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> was the most prevalent bacteria, followed by <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em>. Worryingly high resistance rates were observed for several antibiotics, particularly among Gram-negative bacteria. Ampicillin displayed the highest resistance (91.9%), while colistin and ertapenem remained the most effective. In Gram-positive bacteria, glycopeptides like teicoplanin and vancomycin (0% and 3.3% resistance, respectively) were most effective, but their use was limited. Clindamycin and tetracycline showed decreasing effectiveness. Resistance rates differed between surgical and non-surgical wards, highlighting the complex dynamics of antimicrobial resistance within hospitals. Multidrug resistance (MDR) was substantial, with Gram-negative bacteria exhibiting a 63.6% MDR rate. <em>Acinetobacter baumannii</em> showed the highest MDR rate (88.0%).<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> This study investigated wound infection characteristics, antibiotic resistance patterns of common bacteria, and variations by hospital ward. <em>S. aureus</em> was the most prevalent bacteria, and concerning resistance rates were observed, particularly among Gram-negative bacteria. These findings highlight the prevalence of multidrug resistance in wound infections, emphasizing the importance of infection control measures and judicious antibiotic use.<br/><br/><strong>Keywords:</strong> wound infection, multidrug resistance, antimicrobial resistance, AMR in Vietnam<br/>","PeriodicalId":13577,"journal":{"name":"Infection and Drug Resistance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection and Drug Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/idr.s472025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: At a teaching Hospital in Vietnam, the persistently high incidence of diagnosed wound infection poses ongoing challenges to treatment. This study seeks to explore the causative agents of wound infection and their antimicrobial and multidrug resistance patterns.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Microbiology, Military Hospital 103, Vietnam. Data on microorganisms that caused wound infection and their antimicrobial resistance patterns was recorded from hospitalized patients from 2014 to 2021. Using the chi-square test, we analyzed the initial isolation from wound infection specimens collected from individual patients.
Results: Over a third (34.9%) of wound infection samples yielded bacterial cultures. Staphylococcus aureus was the most prevalent bacteria, followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Worryingly high resistance rates were observed for several antibiotics, particularly among Gram-negative bacteria. Ampicillin displayed the highest resistance (91.9%), while colistin and ertapenem remained the most effective. In Gram-positive bacteria, glycopeptides like teicoplanin and vancomycin (0% and 3.3% resistance, respectively) were most effective, but their use was limited. Clindamycin and tetracycline showed decreasing effectiveness. Resistance rates differed between surgical and non-surgical wards, highlighting the complex dynamics of antimicrobial resistance within hospitals. Multidrug resistance (MDR) was substantial, with Gram-negative bacteria exhibiting a 63.6% MDR rate. Acinetobacter baumannii showed the highest MDR rate (88.0%).
Conclusion: This study investigated wound infection characteristics, antibiotic resistance patterns of common bacteria, and variations by hospital ward. S. aureus was the most prevalent bacteria, and concerning resistance rates were observed, particularly among Gram-negative bacteria. These findings highlight the prevalence of multidrug resistance in wound infections, emphasizing the importance of infection control measures and judicious antibiotic use.

Keywords: wound infection, multidrug resistance, antimicrobial resistance, AMR in Vietnam
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
越南一家教学医院从伤口感染患者中分离出的病原体的抗菌药耐药性模式
目的:在越南的一家教学医院,确诊伤口感染的发病率居高不下,给治疗带来了持续的挑战。本研究旨在探讨伤口感染的致病菌及其抗菌药和多药耐药性模式:方法:一项横断面研究在越南 103 军医院微生物学部进行。记录了 2014 年至 2021 年住院病人的伤口感染微生物数据及其抗菌药耐药性模式。我们使用卡方检验分析了从个别患者采集的伤口感染标本中的初始分离情况:超过三分之一(34.9%)的伤口感染样本进行了细菌培养。金黄色葡萄球菌是最常见的细菌,其次是铜绿假单胞菌。令人担忧的是,几种抗生素的耐药率都很高,尤其是革兰氏阴性菌。氨苄西林的耐药性最高(91.9%),而秋水仙素和厄他培南仍然是最有效的抗生素。在革兰氏阳性细菌中,替考拉宁和万古霉素(耐药性分别为 0% 和 3.3%)等糖肽类药物最为有效,但其使用范围有限。克林霉素和四环素的疗效有所下降。外科病房和非外科病房的耐药率各不相同,凸显了医院内抗菌药物耐药性的复杂动态。多重耐药率(MDR)很高,革兰氏阴性菌的多重耐药率高达 63.6%。鲍曼不动杆菌的耐药率最高(88.0%):本研究调查了伤口感染的特点、常见细菌的抗生素耐药性模式以及不同病房的差异。金黄色葡萄球菌是最常见的细菌,耐药率也很高,尤其是革兰氏阴性菌。这些发现凸显了伤口感染中多种药物耐药性的普遍性,强调了感染控制措施和合理使用抗生素的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infection and Drug Resistance
Infection and Drug Resistance Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
826
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: About Journal Editors Peer Reviewers Articles Article Publishing Charges Aims and Scope Call For Papers ISSN: 1178-6973 Editor-in-Chief: Professor Suresh Antony An international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the optimal treatment of infection (bacterial, fungal and viral) and the development and institution of preventative strategies to minimize the development and spread of resistance.
期刊最新文献
Risk Factors for Multidrug Resistance in Patients Infected with Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A Nomogram. Microbiological Characteristics, Risk Factors, and Short-Term Mortality of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Bloodstream Infections in Pediatric Patients in China: A 10-Year Longitudinal Study. Clinical Characteristics, Species Distribution, and Drug Resistance of Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria Lung Disease in Qingdao, China. A Regional-Scale Assessment-Based SARS-CoV-2 Variants Control Modeling with Implications for Infection Risk Characterization. Disseminated Combined Talaromyces marneffei and Enterococcus faecium Bloodstream Infection Presenting as Gastrointestinal Perforation in a Patient with CARD9 Gene Mutation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1