Cover crop mixtures do not assemble markedly distinct soil microbiotas as compared to monocultures in a multilocation field experiment

IF 4.8 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Applied Soil Ecology Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105573
{"title":"Cover crop mixtures do not assemble markedly distinct soil microbiotas as compared to monocultures in a multilocation field experiment","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cover crops are used in cropping systems to enhance ecosystem services, such as soil resilience to erosion or microbial activity. Different cover crops are selected to steer specific processes, but whether cover crop mixtures have an added value over monocultures remains debated. Here, we investigated if cover crop mixtures accumulate soil microbiotas distinct from those of monocultures, potentially leading to more varied microbially-driven soil functions. We performed a field experiment at three locations in the Netherlands, each including nine cover crop monocultures, five- and eight-species mixtures, and a fallow control. After three months, we measured cover crop biomass and profiled soil bacterial, fungal, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities via amplicon sequencing. The different crop monocultures produced similar biomass across all three locations, and mixtures had average productivity compared to monocultures. The diversity and community structure of soil microbial communities was primarily determined by the geographical location, and then by cover crop treatment at each location. Although the cover crop species affected the soil microbiome differently, cover crop mixtures did neither increase microbial diversity nor the overall community differentiation compared to monocultures. Our results suggest that mixing cover crop species does not significantly influence microbially-driven soil functions, at least in short-term crop rotations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8099,"journal":{"name":"Applied Soil Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139324003044/pdfft?md5=af127b788e1d1de6d9bab5b4b91deb72&pid=1-s2.0-S0929139324003044-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Soil Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139324003044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cover crops are used in cropping systems to enhance ecosystem services, such as soil resilience to erosion or microbial activity. Different cover crops are selected to steer specific processes, but whether cover crop mixtures have an added value over monocultures remains debated. Here, we investigated if cover crop mixtures accumulate soil microbiotas distinct from those of monocultures, potentially leading to more varied microbially-driven soil functions. We performed a field experiment at three locations in the Netherlands, each including nine cover crop monocultures, five- and eight-species mixtures, and a fallow control. After three months, we measured cover crop biomass and profiled soil bacterial, fungal, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities via amplicon sequencing. The different crop monocultures produced similar biomass across all three locations, and mixtures had average productivity compared to monocultures. The diversity and community structure of soil microbial communities was primarily determined by the geographical location, and then by cover crop treatment at each location. Although the cover crop species affected the soil microbiome differently, cover crop mixtures did neither increase microbial diversity nor the overall community differentiation compared to monocultures. Our results suggest that mixing cover crop species does not significantly influence microbially-driven soil functions, at least in short-term crop rotations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在多地点田间试验中,与单一种植相比,混播覆盖作物不会形成明显不同的土壤微生物群落
在种植系统中使用覆盖作物可增强生态系统服务,如土壤抗侵蚀能力或微生物活动。选择不同的覆盖作物是为了引导特定的过程,但覆盖作物混合物是否比单一作物具有附加值仍存在争议。在这里,我们研究了覆盖作物混合物是否会积累不同于单一种植的土壤微生物群,从而可能导致更多不同的微生物驱动的土壤功能。我们在荷兰的三个地点进行了田间试验,每个地点包括九种单一种植的覆盖作物、五种和八种混合物以及休耕对照。三个月后,我们测量了覆盖作物的生物量,并通过扩增子测序分析了土壤细菌、真菌和树胶菌根真菌群落。在所有三个地点,不同作物单作产生的生物量相似,而混作与单作相比具有平均生产力。土壤微生物群落的多样性和群落结构主要由地理位置决定,然后由各地的覆盖作物处理决定。虽然覆盖作物种类对土壤微生物群的影响不同,但与单一种植相比,混合覆盖作物既没有增加微生物多样性,也没有增加群落的整体分化。我们的研究结果表明,至少在短期轮作中,混合种植覆盖作物物种不会对微生物驱动的土壤功能产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Soil Ecology
Applied Soil Ecology 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
363
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Soil Ecology addresses the role of soil organisms and their interactions in relation to: sustainability and productivity, nutrient cycling and other soil processes, the maintenance of soil functions, the impact of human activities on soil ecosystems and bio(techno)logical control of soil-inhabiting pests, diseases and weeds.
期刊最新文献
Future frontiers of agroecosystem management: Shifts in microbial community after passage through the gut of earthworms reveals enhanced abundance of cereal endophytes Processes of assembly of endophytic prokaryotic and rhizosphere fungal communities in table grape are preponderantly deterministic Long-term fertilization reshaped the accumulation of plant- and microbially-derived carbon by regulating biotic and abiotic factors in acidic paddy soil Differential response of soil abundant and rare bacterial subcommunities in the natural restoration process of oil well sites in the Loess Plateau Agricultural management reshaped the diversity patterns and community assembly of rhizosphere bacterial communities in a desert farming system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1