Strategizing sustainability and profitability in electric Mobility-as-a-Service (E-MaaS) ecosystems with carbon incentives: A multi-leader multi-follower game

IF 7.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1016/j.trc.2024.104758
{"title":"Strategizing sustainability and profitability in electric Mobility-as-a-Service (E-MaaS) ecosystems with carbon incentives: A multi-leader multi-follower game","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.trc.2024.104758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Electric Mobility-as-a-Service (E-MaaS) emerges as a promising solution for environmentally-friendly mobility in the future, yet MaaS operators have been struggling to achieve profitability. We introduce a novel E-MaaS ecosystem where platforms can leverage carbon credits revenue from the government’s emissions reduction fund (ERF) by incentivizing travelers to choose more E-MaaS services, thereby reducing carbon emissions. In such an E-MaaS ecosystem, travelers can select either electric (E)-MaaS or traditional (T)-MaaS services and submit heterogeneous requests, such as distance, service time, tolerance for inconvenience, and travel delay budget, which are modeled as inputs. We propose a multi-leader multi-follower game (MLMFG) model where each leader (MaaS platform) competes to maximize its profits by making operational decisions such as pricing, EV acquisition ratio, and E(T)-MaaS bundle allocation while anticipating travelers’ participation levels. In response to the platforms’ decisions, each follower (traveler) aims to minimize her travel costs by determining the participation levels for E(T)-MaaS services via multiple MaaS platforms. We develop a customized alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) algorithm to solve the proposed MLMFG efficiently. Comprehensive numerical experiments based on real-life data in Australia demonstrate the convergence and robustness of the proposed ADMM algorithm. Further, experimental results reveal how factors such as market size, travel demand, ERF budget, subsidy rate, and unit price boundaries impact the profits and operational strategies of different MaaS platforms. Overall, the proposed MLMFG model for the E-MaaS ecosystem provides valuable insights for MaaS operators aiming to balance profitability with environmental responsibility, navigating a future where sustainability and profitability goals could converge.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54417,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X24002791","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electric Mobility-as-a-Service (E-MaaS) emerges as a promising solution for environmentally-friendly mobility in the future, yet MaaS operators have been struggling to achieve profitability. We introduce a novel E-MaaS ecosystem where platforms can leverage carbon credits revenue from the government’s emissions reduction fund (ERF) by incentivizing travelers to choose more E-MaaS services, thereby reducing carbon emissions. In such an E-MaaS ecosystem, travelers can select either electric (E)-MaaS or traditional (T)-MaaS services and submit heterogeneous requests, such as distance, service time, tolerance for inconvenience, and travel delay budget, which are modeled as inputs. We propose a multi-leader multi-follower game (MLMFG) model where each leader (MaaS platform) competes to maximize its profits by making operational decisions such as pricing, EV acquisition ratio, and E(T)-MaaS bundle allocation while anticipating travelers’ participation levels. In response to the platforms’ decisions, each follower (traveler) aims to minimize her travel costs by determining the participation levels for E(T)-MaaS services via multiple MaaS platforms. We develop a customized alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) algorithm to solve the proposed MLMFG efficiently. Comprehensive numerical experiments based on real-life data in Australia demonstrate the convergence and robustness of the proposed ADMM algorithm. Further, experimental results reveal how factors such as market size, travel demand, ERF budget, subsidy rate, and unit price boundaries impact the profits and operational strategies of different MaaS platforms. Overall, the proposed MLMFG model for the E-MaaS ecosystem provides valuable insights for MaaS operators aiming to balance profitability with environmental responsibility, navigating a future where sustainability and profitability goals could converge.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在有碳激励措施的电动汽车即服务(E-MaaS)生态系统中制定可持续性和盈利性战略:多领导多追随者博弈
电动交通即服务(E-MaaS)是未来环保交通的一个前景广阔的解决方案,然而 MaaS 运营商一直在努力实现盈利。我们介绍了一个新颖的 E-MaaS 生态系统,在该系统中,平台可以通过激励旅客选择更多的 E-MaaS 服务,利用政府减排基金(ERF)的碳信用额收入,从而减少碳排放。在这样一个 E-MaaS 生态系统中,旅行者可以选择电动(E)-MaaS 或传统(T)-MaaS 服务,并提交异构请求,如距离、服务时间、对不便的容忍度和旅行延迟预算,这些都被建模为输入。我们提出了一个多领导者多追随者博弈(MLMFG)模型,其中每个领导者(MaaS 平台)通过做出定价、电动汽车获取率和 E(T)-MaaS 捆绑分配等运营决策,同时预测旅行者的参与水平,以实现利润最大化。针对平台的决策,每个追随者(旅行者)通过多个 MaaS 平台确定 E(T)-MaaS 服务的参与水平,从而实现旅行成本最小化。我们开发了一种定制的交替方向乘法(ADMM)算法,以高效求解所提出的 MLMFG。基于澳大利亚真实数据的综合数值实验证明了所提出的 ADMM 算法的收敛性和鲁棒性。此外,实验结果还揭示了市场规模、出行需求、ERF 预算、补贴率和单价边界等因素如何影响不同 MaaS 平台的利润和运营策略。总之,针对 E-MaaS 生态系统提出的 MLMFG 模型为旨在平衡盈利能力与环境责任的 MaaS 运营商提供了宝贵的见解,为可持续发展和盈利目标趋同的未来导航。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
12.00%
发文量
332
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part C (TR_C) is dedicated to showcasing high-quality, scholarly research that delves into the development, applications, and implications of transportation systems and emerging technologies. Our focus lies not solely on individual technologies, but rather on their broader implications for the planning, design, operation, control, maintenance, and rehabilitation of transportation systems, services, and components. In essence, the intellectual core of the journal revolves around the transportation aspect rather than the technology itself. We actively encourage the integration of quantitative methods from diverse fields such as operations research, control systems, complex networks, computer science, and artificial intelligence. Join us in exploring the intersection of transportation systems and emerging technologies to drive innovation and progress in the field.
期刊最新文献
An environmentally-aware dynamic planning of electric vehicles for aircraft towing considering stochastic aircraft arrival and departure times Network-wide speed–flow estimation considering uncertain traffic conditions and sparse multi-type detectors: A KL divergence-based optimization approach Revealing the impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on intercity truck transport: New insights from big data analytics MATNEC: AIS data-driven environment-adaptive maritime traffic network construction for realistic route generation A qualitative AI security risk assessment of autonomous vehicles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1