Distinct Mindfulness States Produce Dissociable Effects on Neural Markers of Emotion Processing: Evidence From the Late Positive Potential

Yanli Lin , Marne L. White , Deanna Wu , Natee Viravan , Todd S. Braver
{"title":"Distinct Mindfulness States Produce Dissociable Effects on Neural Markers of Emotion Processing: Evidence From the Late Positive Potential","authors":"Yanli Lin ,&nbsp;Marne L. White ,&nbsp;Deanna Wu ,&nbsp;Natee Viravan ,&nbsp;Todd S. Braver","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsgos.2024.100357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Mindfulness has long been theorized to benefit emotion regulation, but despite the ubiquity of the claim, there is little empirical evidence demonstrating how mindfulness modulates the neurophysiology of emotion processing. The current study aimed to fill this gap in knowledge by leveraging a novel research approach capable of discretizing mindfulness into distinct states of open monitoring (OM) and focused attention (FA) to distinguish their influence on multimodal subjective and objective measures of emotion processing.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Utilizing a fully within-participant picture viewing state induction protocol (<em>N</em> = 30), we compared the effects of OM and FA, rigorously contrasted against an active control, on the visually evoked late positive potential (LPP), a neural index of motivated attention. Bayesian mixed modeling was used to distinguish OM versus FA effects on the early and late sustained LPP while evaluating the influence of subjective arousal ratings as a within-participant moderator of the state inductions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>When negative picture trials were retrospectively rated as more subjectively arousing, the OM induction reduced the late sustained LPP response, whereas the FA induction enhanced the LPP.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Acute manipulation of OM and FA states may reduce and enhance motivated attention to aversive stimuli during conditions of high subjective arousal, respectively. Functional distinctions between different mindfulness states on emotion processing may be most dissociable after accounting for within-participant variability in how stimuli are appraised. These results support the future potential of the state induction protocol for parsing the neural affective mechanisms that underlie mindfulness training programs and interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72373,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry global open science","volume":"4 5","pages":"Article 100357"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667174324000703/pdfft?md5=aee0b80cfe093e2bc520c3ceb00ea55e&pid=1-s2.0-S2667174324000703-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological psychiatry global open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667174324000703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Mindfulness has long been theorized to benefit emotion regulation, but despite the ubiquity of the claim, there is little empirical evidence demonstrating how mindfulness modulates the neurophysiology of emotion processing. The current study aimed to fill this gap in knowledge by leveraging a novel research approach capable of discretizing mindfulness into distinct states of open monitoring (OM) and focused attention (FA) to distinguish their influence on multimodal subjective and objective measures of emotion processing.

Methods

Utilizing a fully within-participant picture viewing state induction protocol (N = 30), we compared the effects of OM and FA, rigorously contrasted against an active control, on the visually evoked late positive potential (LPP), a neural index of motivated attention. Bayesian mixed modeling was used to distinguish OM versus FA effects on the early and late sustained LPP while evaluating the influence of subjective arousal ratings as a within-participant moderator of the state inductions.

Results

When negative picture trials were retrospectively rated as more subjectively arousing, the OM induction reduced the late sustained LPP response, whereas the FA induction enhanced the LPP.

Conclusions

Acute manipulation of OM and FA states may reduce and enhance motivated attention to aversive stimuli during conditions of high subjective arousal, respectively. Functional distinctions between different mindfulness states on emotion processing may be most dissociable after accounting for within-participant variability in how stimuli are appraised. These results support the future potential of the state induction protocol for parsing the neural affective mechanisms that underlie mindfulness training programs and interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同的正念状态会对情绪处理的神经标记产生不同的影响:来自晚期正电位的证据
背景正念长期以来一直被认为有益于情绪调节,但尽管这种说法无处不在,却很少有实证证据能证明正念是如何调节情绪处理的神经生理学的。本研究旨在利用一种新颖的研究方法填补这一知识空白,这种方法能够将正念离散化为开放监控(OM)和集中注意力(FA)的不同状态,以区分它们对情绪处理的多模态主观和客观测量的影响。方法利用完全在参与者内部进行的图片观看状态诱导协议(N = 30),我们比较了开放监控和集中注意力对视觉诱发的晚期正电位(LPP)的影响,晚期正电位是动机注意力的神经指标。贝叶斯混合模型用于区分OM和FA对早期和晚期持续LPP的影响,同时评估主观唤醒评级作为状态诱导的参与者内调节因子的影响。结果当负面图片试验被回顾性地评定为主观唤醒程度较高时,OM诱导降低了晚期持续LPP反应,而FA诱导增强了LPP。不同正念状态对情绪处理的功能区分可能在考虑了参与者内部对刺激评价方式的差异后最为明显。这些结果支持了状态诱导协议在解析正念训练计划和干预措施的神经情感机制方面的未来潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biological psychiatry global open science
Biological psychiatry global open science Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
91 days
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Editorial Board Page Subscribers Page Guide for Authors In This Issue – November
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1