Short-term learning effect of ChatGPT on pharmacy students' learning

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100478
Kristian Svendsen, Mohsen Askar, Danial Umer, Kjell H. Halvorsen
{"title":"Short-term learning effect of ChatGPT on pharmacy students' learning","authors":"Kristian Svendsen,&nbsp;Mohsen Askar,&nbsp;Danial Umer,&nbsp;Kjell H. Halvorsen","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Students in pharmacy are positive towards integrating artificial intelligence and ChatGPT into their practice. The aim of this study was to investigate the direct short-term learning effect of using Chat GPT by pharmacy students.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was an experimental randomized study. Students were allocated into two groups; the intervention group (<em>n</em> = 15) used all study tools and ChatGPT, while the control group (<em>n</em> = 16) used all study tools, except ChatGPT. Differences between groups was measured by how well they performed on a knowledge test before and after a short study period.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No significant difference was found between the intervention and control groups in level of competence in the pretest score (<em>p</em> <em>=</em> <em>0.28</em>). There was also no significant effect of using ChatGPT, with a mean adjusted difference of 0.5 points on a 12-point scale. However there was a trend towards a higher proportion of ChatGPT participants having a large (at least four point) increase in score (4 out of 15) <em>vs</em> control group (1 out of 16).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is a potential for positive effects of ChatGPT on learning outcomes in pharmacy students, however the current study was underpowered to measure a statistically significant effect of ChatGPT on short term learning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100478"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000751/pdfft?md5=d65bb9031080175247b69b4502982785&pid=1-s2.0-S2667276624000751-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Students in pharmacy are positive towards integrating artificial intelligence and ChatGPT into their practice. The aim of this study was to investigate the direct short-term learning effect of using Chat GPT by pharmacy students.

Methods

This was an experimental randomized study. Students were allocated into two groups; the intervention group (n = 15) used all study tools and ChatGPT, while the control group (n = 16) used all study tools, except ChatGPT. Differences between groups was measured by how well they performed on a knowledge test before and after a short study period.

Results

No significant difference was found between the intervention and control groups in level of competence in the pretest score (p = 0.28). There was also no significant effect of using ChatGPT, with a mean adjusted difference of 0.5 points on a 12-point scale. However there was a trend towards a higher proportion of ChatGPT participants having a large (at least four point) increase in score (4 out of 15) vs control group (1 out of 16).

Conclusion

There is a potential for positive effects of ChatGPT on learning outcomes in pharmacy students, however the current study was underpowered to measure a statistically significant effect of ChatGPT on short term learning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ChatGPT 对药学专业学生的短期学习效果
导言药剂学专业的学生对将人工智能和 ChatGPT 融入实践持积极态度。本研究旨在调查药学专业学生使用 Chat GPT 的直接短期学习效果。学生被分为两组:干预组(n = 15)使用所有学习工具和 ChatGPT,对照组(n = 16)使用除 ChatGPT 以外的所有学习工具。结果干预组和对照组的能力水平在前测得分上没有发现显著差异(p = 0.28)。使用 ChatGPT 的效果也不明显,12 分制的平均调整差异为 0.5 分。结论:ChatGPT 有可能对药学专业学生的学习成果产生积极影响,但目前的研究力量不足,无法测量 ChatGPT 对短期学习的显著统计学影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
期刊最新文献
Pharmacy robberies and occupational safety risks: A national cross-sectional study of community pharmacies. Potential clinical impact of pharmaceutical interventions in an interprofessional medication management program. Identifying patient data that should be available in community pharmacies for statutory dispensing and providing clinical pharmacy services: A Delphi study Evaluating the implementation of a deprescribing intervention in Swiss nursing homes: An observational study using qualitative and quantitative methods Automated dispensing cabinets and nurse-related medication errors in inpatient settings: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1