Claiming for justice in transitions: Analyzing the multidimensional and multiscalar complexity of justice in the context of Mining Act reform in Finland

Abstract

This research aims to uncover tensions and contradictions between justice claims within the context of low-carbon transitions and the growing demand for critical minerals. By exploring the contested Mining Act reform in Finland, the study sheds light on the multidimensional and multiscalar complexities of justice claims made by various stakeholders. Based on qualitative content analysis of document and interview data, the findings highlight that stakeholders mobilize justice claims on micro, meso, and macro scales, emphasizing diverse normative dimensions and creating tensions around perceived justice in transitions. These claims illustrate the multiscalar nature of mining and the justice consequences of growing critical minerals demand. The research emphasizes the need for a comprehensive approach to address justice tensions and contributes to understanding conflicts around critical minerals mining through a systematic analysis of justice claims. Beyond empirical insights, the study raises critical questions about the role of conflicts and the meaning of justice in low-carbon transitions.