Administrative audit regulation and the quality of accounting information: Evidence from China securities regulatory commission’s random inspection system

IF 6.3 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Research in International Business and Finance Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102502
{"title":"Administrative audit regulation and the quality of accounting information: Evidence from China securities regulatory commission’s random inspection system","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Based on the “double random” inspection system implemented by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) on accounting firms, our study uses staggered DID method to examine the effect of administrative audit regulation on the quality of corporate accounting information. The results suggest: (1) The administrative audit regulation can effectively improve corporate accounting information quality; (2) The mechanism test reveals that the administrative audit regulation improves the quality of accounting information by improving internal control; (3) Further study reveals that the governance effect of the administrative audit regulation is more pronounced for firms with non-Big four auditing, high risk of misstatement and more agency costs. Our study investigates the governance effect of the CSRC’s random inspection system on the quality of corporate accounting information, providing theoretical and empirical evidence for the effectiveness of administrative audit supervision from the perspective of corporate accounting information system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51430,"journal":{"name":"Research in International Business and Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in International Business and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531924002952","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on the “double random” inspection system implemented by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) on accounting firms, our study uses staggered DID method to examine the effect of administrative audit regulation on the quality of corporate accounting information. The results suggest: (1) The administrative audit regulation can effectively improve corporate accounting information quality; (2) The mechanism test reveals that the administrative audit regulation improves the quality of accounting information by improving internal control; (3) Further study reveals that the governance effect of the administrative audit regulation is more pronounced for firms with non-Big four auditing, high risk of misstatement and more agency costs. Our study investigates the governance effect of the CSRC’s random inspection system on the quality of corporate accounting information, providing theoretical and empirical evidence for the effectiveness of administrative audit supervision from the perspective of corporate accounting information system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行政审计监管与会计信息质量:中国证监会抽查制度的证据
基于中国证监会对会计师事务所实施的 "双随机 "检查制度,本研究采用交错 DID 法检验行政审计监管对企业会计信息质量的影响。研究结果表明:(1)行政性审计监管能有效提高企业会计信息质量;(2)机理检验表明,行政性审计监管通过完善内部控制提高会计信息质量;(3)进一步研究发现,行政性审计监管的治理效应对于非四大审计、错报风险高和代理成本较高的企业更为明显。我们的研究考察了中国证监会抽查制度对企业会计信息质量的治理效应,从企业会计信息体系的角度为行政审计监管的有效性提供了理论和实证证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.20%
发文量
240
期刊介绍: Research in International Business and Finance (RIBAF) seeks to consolidate its position as a premier scholarly vehicle of academic finance. The Journal publishes high quality, insightful, well-written papers that explore current and new issues in international finance. Papers that foster dialogue, innovation, and intellectual risk-taking in financial studies; as well as shed light on the interaction between finance and broader societal concerns are particularly appreciated. The Journal welcomes submissions that seek to expand the boundaries of academic finance and otherwise challenge the discipline. Papers studying finance using a variety of methodologies; as well as interdisciplinary studies will be considered for publication. Papers that examine topical issues using extensive international data sets are welcome. Single-country studies can also be considered for publication provided that they develop novel methodological and theoretical approaches or fall within the Journal''s priority themes. It is especially important that single-country studies communicate to the reader why the particular chosen country is especially relevant to the issue being investigated. [...] The scope of topics that are most interesting to RIBAF readers include the following: -Financial markets and institutions -Financial practices and sustainability -The impact of national culture on finance -The impact of formal and informal institutions on finance -Privatizations, public financing, and nonprofit issues in finance -Interdisciplinary financial studies -Finance and international development -International financial crises and regulation -Financialization studies -International financial integration and architecture -Behavioral aspects in finance -Consumer finance -Methodologies and conceptualization issues related to finance
期刊最新文献
Multiscale cross-sector tail credit risk spillovers in China: Evidence from EEMD-based VAR quantile analysis Uncovering patterns of fintech behavior in Italian banks: A multidimensional statistical analysis The impact of digital transformation on the servitization transformation of manufacturing firms Do oil price shocks drive systematic risk premia in stock markets? A novel investment application Signaling vs. agency theory: What drives dividends of promoter-owned firms during a crisis?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1