Landscapes of (in)justice: Reflecting on voices, spaces and alliances for just transitions

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103701
{"title":"Landscapes of (in)justice: Reflecting on voices, spaces and alliances for just transitions","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Transitioning to a low carbon global economy will inevitably create winners and losers. Such rapid and far-reaching changes in the adoption of low-carbon technologies, lifestyle changes and labour relations require meaningful public engagement for policy to be both effective and equitable. But despite a large body of work on just transitions, there has been less attention paid to questions of citizen engagement in just transitions. In particular, the process of how and by whom social needs, priorities and demands are articulated and acted upon. While some research has mapped public participation on climate change, and there is a larger body of work on questions of social acceptance, there is a gap in our understanding of how citizen engagement with just transitions can be deepened and enhanced by drawing on experiences to date from other related and parallel processes. On one level, this neglect is unsurprising given the limited nature of processes explicitly designed to promote just transitions, such as the Just Energy Transition Partnerships (JET-Ps) or experiences of national level dialogues and commissions, despite recent interest in the related use of climate assemblies to enable citizen engagement. But, we argue, there are significant lessons to be drawn for citizen engagement with just transitions from a long and rich experience of previous attempts to amplify voices, create spaces for citizen engagement, and build alliances to address justice issues across a range of struggles over resource pathways.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002925/pdfft?md5=3a19250d72437407b189e790aa022817&pid=1-s2.0-S2214629624002925-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002925","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transitioning to a low carbon global economy will inevitably create winners and losers. Such rapid and far-reaching changes in the adoption of low-carbon technologies, lifestyle changes and labour relations require meaningful public engagement for policy to be both effective and equitable. But despite a large body of work on just transitions, there has been less attention paid to questions of citizen engagement in just transitions. In particular, the process of how and by whom social needs, priorities and demands are articulated and acted upon. While some research has mapped public participation on climate change, and there is a larger body of work on questions of social acceptance, there is a gap in our understanding of how citizen engagement with just transitions can be deepened and enhanced by drawing on experiences to date from other related and parallel processes. On one level, this neglect is unsurprising given the limited nature of processes explicitly designed to promote just transitions, such as the Just Energy Transition Partnerships (JET-Ps) or experiences of national level dialogues and commissions, despite recent interest in the related use of climate assemblies to enable citizen engagement. But, we argue, there are significant lessons to be drawn for citizen engagement with just transitions from a long and rich experience of previous attempts to amplify voices, create spaces for citizen engagement, and build alliances to address justice issues across a range of struggles over resource pathways.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不)公正的景观:反思促进公正过渡的声音、空间和联盟
向全球低碳经济转型将不可避免地产生赢家和输家。在采用低碳技术、改变生活方式和劳资关系等方面发生如此迅速而深远的变化,需要有意义的公众参与,才能使政策既有效又公平。然而,尽管有大量关于公正过渡的研究,但对公民参与公正过渡问题的关注却较少。特别是,如何以及由谁来表达社会需求、优先事项和要求并采取相应行动的过程。虽然一些研究已经绘制了气候变化方面的公众参与图,也有大量关于社会接受度问题的工作,但我们对公民参与公正过渡的理解还存在差距,即如何通过借鉴迄今为止其他相关和平行进程的经验来深化和加强公民参与公正过渡。从某种程度上说,这种忽视并不奇怪,因为明确旨在促进公正转型的进程非常有限,比如公正能源转型伙伴关系(JET-Ps)或国家级对话和委员会的经验,尽管最近人们对利用气候大会来促进公民参与的相关做法很感兴趣。但我们认为,公民参与公正转型可以从以往长期而丰富的尝试中汲取重要的经验教训,这些尝试旨在放大声音,为公民参与创造空间,并建立联盟以解决一系列资源途径斗争中的公正问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Juggling the basics: How much does an income increase affect energy spending of low-income households in England? The informality-energy innovation-finance nexus: Sustainable business models for microgrid-based off-grid urban energy access The future of fossil fuels, chemicals, and feedstocks: Outlining a research agenda on the role of China in the global petrochemical industry Green hydrogen transitions deepen socioecological risks and extractivist patterns: evidence from 28 prospective exporting countries in the Global South Unpacking travel needs and experiences: Insights from qualitative interviews with affordable housing residents in California
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1