Antibody-mediated rejection in post-liver transplant clinical care: Are we there yet for timely diagnosis and treatment?

Kevin H. Toomer , Ahmet Gurakar , Kiyoko Oshima
{"title":"Antibody-mediated rejection in post-liver transplant clinical care: Are we there yet for timely diagnosis and treatment?","authors":"Kevin H. Toomer ,&nbsp;Ahmet Gurakar ,&nbsp;Kiyoko Oshima","doi":"10.1016/j.liver.2024.100236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With improvements in medical management and surgical technique in the field of solid organ transplantation, many historically prominent causes of liver allograft injury have been ameliorated or, in the case of Hepatitis C virus, eliminated altogether. In this transformed clinical landscape, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has emerged as a defining barrier to maintenance of long-term liver allograft function. The liver's unique anatomy, high regenerative capacity, and tolerogenic immunological environment tend to mitigate the severest AMR manifestations. Consequently, the clinical importance of AMR in the liver has been recognized more slowly than for other solid organ allografts. Significant strides have been made in elucidating clinical and histopathologic features of acute and chronic liver AMR, with the Banff 2016 criteria among the most notable. However, current histopathologic definitions of AMR are lacking in sensitivity and specificity. C4d staining is an imperfect biological surrogate for antibody-mediated injury, and suffers from significant technical limitations. The frequent co-occurrence of T cell mediated rejection and non-immunologic allograft damage (including recurrence of primary disease) also hinders definitive identification of AMR and results in misattribution of its effects. The goal of this review is to summarize the current understanding of AMR in the context of liver transplantation, including risk factors, pathogenesis, and current diagnostic and treatment strategies. Potential directions of future research are also addressed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Liver Transplantation","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666967624000370/pdfft?md5=244fd1c1f91ffee3f2d7d5bc8f819ed6&pid=1-s2.0-S2666967624000370-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Liver Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666967624000370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With improvements in medical management and surgical technique in the field of solid organ transplantation, many historically prominent causes of liver allograft injury have been ameliorated or, in the case of Hepatitis C virus, eliminated altogether. In this transformed clinical landscape, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has emerged as a defining barrier to maintenance of long-term liver allograft function. The liver's unique anatomy, high regenerative capacity, and tolerogenic immunological environment tend to mitigate the severest AMR manifestations. Consequently, the clinical importance of AMR in the liver has been recognized more slowly than for other solid organ allografts. Significant strides have been made in elucidating clinical and histopathologic features of acute and chronic liver AMR, with the Banff 2016 criteria among the most notable. However, current histopathologic definitions of AMR are lacking in sensitivity and specificity. C4d staining is an imperfect biological surrogate for antibody-mediated injury, and suffers from significant technical limitations. The frequent co-occurrence of T cell mediated rejection and non-immunologic allograft damage (including recurrence of primary disease) also hinders definitive identification of AMR and results in misattribution of its effects. The goal of this review is to summarize the current understanding of AMR in the context of liver transplantation, including risk factors, pathogenesis, and current diagnostic and treatment strategies. Potential directions of future research are also addressed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肝移植术后临床护理中的抗体介导排斥反应:我们还能及时诊断和治疗吗?
随着实体器官移植领域医疗管理和手术技术的改进,许多历史上导致肝脏同种异体移植损伤的主要原因已得到改善,或(就丙型肝炎病毒而言)已被完全消除。在这一转变的临床环境中,抗体介导的排斥反应(AMR)已成为肝脏异体移植长期功能维持的决定性障碍。肝脏独特的解剖结构、高再生能力和耐受性免疫环境往往能减轻最严重的AMR表现。因此,与其他实体器官异体移植相比,人们对肝脏AMR临床重要性的认识较为缓慢。在阐明急性和慢性肝脏AMR的临床和组织病理学特征方面取得了重大进展,其中最引人注目的是班夫2016标准。然而,目前对AMR的组织病理学定义缺乏敏感性和特异性。C4d 染色是抗体介导损伤的一种不完善的生物学替代物,存在很大的技术局限性。T 细胞介导的排斥反应和非免疫性异体移植损伤(包括原发疾病复发)经常同时出现,这也阻碍了 AMR 的明确鉴定,并导致对其影响的错误归因。本综述旨在总结目前对肝移植AMR的认识,包括风险因素、发病机制以及目前的诊断和治疗策略。同时还探讨了未来研究的潜在方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Contents Technical refinements to reduce the early biliary complication in living donor liver transplantation Daratumumab as a rescue therapy for antibody-mediated rejection in super-urgent ABO-incompatible pediatric liver transplantation The effects of underlying inflammatory bowel disease on the outcomes of primary sclerosing cholangitis liver transplant recipients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1