{"title":"Antibody-mediated rejection in post-liver transplant clinical care: Are we there yet for timely diagnosis and treatment?","authors":"Kevin H. Toomer , Ahmet Gurakar , Kiyoko Oshima","doi":"10.1016/j.liver.2024.100236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With improvements in medical management and surgical technique in the field of solid organ transplantation, many historically prominent causes of liver allograft injury have been ameliorated or, in the case of Hepatitis C virus, eliminated altogether. In this transformed clinical landscape, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has emerged as a defining barrier to maintenance of long-term liver allograft function. The liver's unique anatomy, high regenerative capacity, and tolerogenic immunological environment tend to mitigate the severest AMR manifestations. Consequently, the clinical importance of AMR in the liver has been recognized more slowly than for other solid organ allografts. Significant strides have been made in elucidating clinical and histopathologic features of acute and chronic liver AMR, with the Banff 2016 criteria among the most notable. However, current histopathologic definitions of AMR are lacking in sensitivity and specificity. C4d staining is an imperfect biological surrogate for antibody-mediated injury, and suffers from significant technical limitations. The frequent co-occurrence of T cell mediated rejection and non-immunologic allograft damage (including recurrence of primary disease) also hinders definitive identification of AMR and results in misattribution of its effects. The goal of this review is to summarize the current understanding of AMR in the context of liver transplantation, including risk factors, pathogenesis, and current diagnostic and treatment strategies. Potential directions of future research are also addressed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Liver Transplantation","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666967624000370/pdfft?md5=244fd1c1f91ffee3f2d7d5bc8f819ed6&pid=1-s2.0-S2666967624000370-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Liver Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666967624000370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With improvements in medical management and surgical technique in the field of solid organ transplantation, many historically prominent causes of liver allograft injury have been ameliorated or, in the case of Hepatitis C virus, eliminated altogether. In this transformed clinical landscape, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has emerged as a defining barrier to maintenance of long-term liver allograft function. The liver's unique anatomy, high regenerative capacity, and tolerogenic immunological environment tend to mitigate the severest AMR manifestations. Consequently, the clinical importance of AMR in the liver has been recognized more slowly than for other solid organ allografts. Significant strides have been made in elucidating clinical and histopathologic features of acute and chronic liver AMR, with the Banff 2016 criteria among the most notable. However, current histopathologic definitions of AMR are lacking in sensitivity and specificity. C4d staining is an imperfect biological surrogate for antibody-mediated injury, and suffers from significant technical limitations. The frequent co-occurrence of T cell mediated rejection and non-immunologic allograft damage (including recurrence of primary disease) also hinders definitive identification of AMR and results in misattribution of its effects. The goal of this review is to summarize the current understanding of AMR in the context of liver transplantation, including risk factors, pathogenesis, and current diagnostic and treatment strategies. Potential directions of future research are also addressed.
随着实体器官移植领域医疗管理和手术技术的改进,许多历史上导致肝脏同种异体移植损伤的主要原因已得到改善,或(就丙型肝炎病毒而言)已被完全消除。在这一转变的临床环境中,抗体介导的排斥反应(AMR)已成为肝脏异体移植长期功能维持的决定性障碍。肝脏独特的解剖结构、高再生能力和耐受性免疫环境往往能减轻最严重的AMR表现。因此,与其他实体器官异体移植相比,人们对肝脏AMR临床重要性的认识较为缓慢。在阐明急性和慢性肝脏AMR的临床和组织病理学特征方面取得了重大进展,其中最引人注目的是班夫2016标准。然而,目前对AMR的组织病理学定义缺乏敏感性和特异性。C4d 染色是抗体介导损伤的一种不完善的生物学替代物,存在很大的技术局限性。T 细胞介导的排斥反应和非免疫性异体移植损伤(包括原发疾病复发)经常同时出现,这也阻碍了 AMR 的明确鉴定,并导致对其影响的错误归因。本综述旨在总结目前对肝移植AMR的认识,包括风险因素、发病机制以及目前的诊断和治疗策略。同时还探讨了未来研究的潜在方向。