Bipolar disorder: Construction and analysis of a joint diagnostic model using random forest and feedforward neural networks

IF 2 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES IBRO Neuroscience Reports Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1016/j.ibneur.2024.07.007
{"title":"Bipolar disorder: Construction and analysis of a joint diagnostic model using random forest and feedforward neural networks","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ibneur.2024.07.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To construct a diagnostic model for Bipolar Disorder (BD) depressive phase using peripheral tissue RNA data from patients and combining Random Forest with Feedforward Neural Network methods.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Datasets GSE23848, GSE39653, and GSE69486 were selected, and differential gene expression analysis was conducted using the limma package in R. Key genes from the differentially expressed genes were identified using the Random Forest method. These key genes' expression levels in each sample were used to train a Feedforward Neural Network model. Techniques like L1 regularization, early stopping, and dropout layers were employed to prevent model overfitting. Model performance was then validated, followed by GO, KEGG, and protein-protein interaction network analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The final model was a Feedforward Neural Network with two hidden layers and two dropout layers, comprising 2345 trainable parameters. Model performance on the validation set, assessed through 1000 bootstrap resampling iterations, demonstrated a specificity of 0.769 (95 % CI 0.571–1.000), sensitivity of 0.818 (95 % CI 0.533–1.000), AUC value of 0.832 (95 % CI 0.642–0.979), and accuracy of 0.792 (95 % CI 0.625–0.958). Enrichment analysis of key genes indicated no significant enrichment in any known pathways.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Key genes with biological significance were identified based on the decrease in Gini coefficient within the Random Forest model. The combined use of Random Forest and Feedforward Neural Network to establish a diagnostic model showed good classification performance in Bipolar Disorder.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13195,"journal":{"name":"IBRO Neuroscience Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667242124000691/pdfft?md5=bd0cf64abca37364e4ff55dbbc41772c&pid=1-s2.0-S2667242124000691-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IBRO Neuroscience Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667242124000691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

To construct a diagnostic model for Bipolar Disorder (BD) depressive phase using peripheral tissue RNA data from patients and combining Random Forest with Feedforward Neural Network methods.

Methods

Datasets GSE23848, GSE39653, and GSE69486 were selected, and differential gene expression analysis was conducted using the limma package in R. Key genes from the differentially expressed genes were identified using the Random Forest method. These key genes' expression levels in each sample were used to train a Feedforward Neural Network model. Techniques like L1 regularization, early stopping, and dropout layers were employed to prevent model overfitting. Model performance was then validated, followed by GO, KEGG, and protein-protein interaction network analyses.

Results

The final model was a Feedforward Neural Network with two hidden layers and two dropout layers, comprising 2345 trainable parameters. Model performance on the validation set, assessed through 1000 bootstrap resampling iterations, demonstrated a specificity of 0.769 (95 % CI 0.571–1.000), sensitivity of 0.818 (95 % CI 0.533–1.000), AUC value of 0.832 (95 % CI 0.642–0.979), and accuracy of 0.792 (95 % CI 0.625–0.958). Enrichment analysis of key genes indicated no significant enrichment in any known pathways.

Conclusion

Key genes with biological significance were identified based on the decrease in Gini coefficient within the Random Forest model. The combined use of Random Forest and Feedforward Neural Network to establish a diagnostic model showed good classification performance in Bipolar Disorder.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
躁郁症:利用随机森林和前馈神经网络构建和分析联合诊断模型
方法选取GSE23848、GSE39653和GSE69486数据集,使用R语言中的limma软件包进行差异基因表达分析。这些关键基因在每个样本中的表达水平被用来训练前馈神经网络模型。为了防止模型过度拟合,采用了 L1 正则化、提前停止和剔除层等技术。结果最终模型是一个前馈神经网络,有两个隐藏层和两个剔除层,包含 2345 个可训练参数。通过 1000 次引导重采样迭代评估了模型在验证集上的表现,结果显示特异性为 0.769(95 % CI 0.571-1.000),灵敏度为 0.818(95 % CI 0.533-1.000),AUC 值为 0.832(95 % CI 0.642-0.979),准确度为 0.792(95 % CI 0.625-0.958)。关键基因的富集分析表明,在任何已知通路中都没有明显的富集。结合使用随机森林和前馈神经网络建立的诊断模型对双相情感障碍有良好的分类效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IBRO Neuroscience Reports
IBRO Neuroscience Reports Neuroscience-Neuroscience (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Irisin alleviates chronic constriction injury-induced hyperalgesia and affective disorders in mice through NF-κB and Nrf2 signaling pathways Spontaneous running wheel exercise during pregnancy prevents later neonatal-anoxia-induced somatic and neurodevelopmental alterations Cannabinoid type 2 receptor deficiency leads to Aβ-induced cognitive impairment through promoting microglial sensitivity to Aβ in the prefrontal cortex in mice Effect of microwave radiation on adult neurogenesis and behavior of prenatally exposed rats Modulation of CB1 cannabinoid receptor alters the electrophysiological properties of cerebellar Purkinje cells in harmaline-induced essential tremor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1