{"title":"Porosity and bedding controls on bio-induced carbonate precipitation and mechanical properties of shale and dolomitic rocks: EICP vs MICP","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bgtech.2024.100102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Biocementation is an emerging field within geotechnical engineering that focuses on harnessing microbiological activity to enhance the mechanical properties and behavior of rocks. It often relies on microbial-induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) or enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) which utilizes biomineralization by promoting the generation of calcium carbonate (CaCO<sub>3</sub>) within the pores of geomaterials (rock and soil). However, there is still a lack of knowledge about the effect of porosity and bedding on biocementation in rocks from a mechanistic view. This experimental study investigated the impact of porosity and bedding orientations on the mechanical response of rocks due to biocementations, using two distinct biocementation strategies (MICP and EICP) and characteristically low porosity but interbedded rocks (shale) and more porous but non-bedded (dolostone) rocks. We first conducted biocementation treatments (MICP and EICP) of rock samples over a distinct period and temperature. Subsequently, the rock strength (uniaxial compressive strength, <em>UCS</em>) was measured. Finally, we analyzed the pre- and post-treatment changes in the rock samples to better understand the effect of MICP and EICP biocementations on the mechanical response of the rock samples. The results indicate that biocementations in dolostones can improve the rock mechanical integrity (EICP: +58% <em>UCS</em>; MICP: +25% <em>UCS</em>). In shales, biocementations can either slightly improve (EICP: +1% <em>UCS</em>) or weaken the rock mechanical integrity (MICP: −39% <em>UCS</em>)<em>.</em> Further, results suggest that the major controlling mechanisms of biogeomechanical alterations due to MICP and EICP in rocks can be attributed to the inherent porosity, biocementation type, and bedding orientations, and in few cases the mechanisms can be swelling, osmotic suction, or pore pressurization. The findings in this study provide novel insights into the mechanical responses of rocks due to MICP and EICP biocementations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100175,"journal":{"name":"Biogeotechnics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949929124000342/pdfft?md5=1b0d98ae6537e922cb84f6483aae4130&pid=1-s2.0-S2949929124000342-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biogeotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949929124000342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Biocementation is an emerging field within geotechnical engineering that focuses on harnessing microbiological activity to enhance the mechanical properties and behavior of rocks. It often relies on microbial-induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) or enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) which utilizes biomineralization by promoting the generation of calcium carbonate (CaCO3) within the pores of geomaterials (rock and soil). However, there is still a lack of knowledge about the effect of porosity and bedding on biocementation in rocks from a mechanistic view. This experimental study investigated the impact of porosity and bedding orientations on the mechanical response of rocks due to biocementations, using two distinct biocementation strategies (MICP and EICP) and characteristically low porosity but interbedded rocks (shale) and more porous but non-bedded (dolostone) rocks. We first conducted biocementation treatments (MICP and EICP) of rock samples over a distinct period and temperature. Subsequently, the rock strength (uniaxial compressive strength, UCS) was measured. Finally, we analyzed the pre- and post-treatment changes in the rock samples to better understand the effect of MICP and EICP biocementations on the mechanical response of the rock samples. The results indicate that biocementations in dolostones can improve the rock mechanical integrity (EICP: +58% UCS; MICP: +25% UCS). In shales, biocementations can either slightly improve (EICP: +1% UCS) or weaken the rock mechanical integrity (MICP: −39% UCS). Further, results suggest that the major controlling mechanisms of biogeomechanical alterations due to MICP and EICP in rocks can be attributed to the inherent porosity, biocementation type, and bedding orientations, and in few cases the mechanisms can be swelling, osmotic suction, or pore pressurization. The findings in this study provide novel insights into the mechanical responses of rocks due to MICP and EICP biocementations.