Why Aren't Americans Eating Enough Seafood? A Seafood Consumption Pilot Study

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.057
Christine Zellers MPH
{"title":"Why Aren't Americans Eating Enough Seafood? A Seafood Consumption Pilot Study","authors":"Christine Zellers MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Regular seafood consumption has important implications for human health, including reduced risk for chronic disease. The 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommend twice weekly consumption of varied seafood as a strategy to lower dietary saturated fat and sodium levels. However, almost 90% of Americans do not eat the recommended amounts of seafood. Additional education is warranted to boost seafood consumption and foster associated health and socioeconomic benefits.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to determine what educational modalities would encourage greater seafood consumption by Americans.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>This study examined barriers to access, cost, preparation, and consumer misconceptions about seafood. Participants who completed the 24 question pre survey were given either a $50 gift card to a local seafood market or $5 Visa card. Post-survey participants received a $5 Visa gift card.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>Survey data was collected using Qualtrics to ascertain consumer attitudes about cost of seafood, health outcomes, access, sustainability, mercury perceptions, and purchasing habits.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants (n=129) completed the pre survey and (n=107) the post survey. After using the gift card for a local fish monger, 76.12% of participants indicated they were encouraged to eat more seafood. Of those who indicated they did not feel encouraged to eat more seafood, 52.38% said they already ate enough seafood. Other objections to seafood consumption included: could not afford seafood, and personal preference issues like taste, texture, and smell. Participants also indicated educational materials that would encourage greater consumption included: recipes for seafood (13.82%), coupons to purchase less expensive seafood (14.82%), and information on purchasing seasonal seafood (8.04%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This pilot study provided data to develop seafood nutrition education based on consumer preferences. It is intended to support curriculum development and assist with the expansion of supplemental information, while also acting as a potential driver for policy and systems change for increased seafood consumption and equitable access.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>John and Anne Gerwig Director's Fund Award</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S149940462400157X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Regular seafood consumption has important implications for human health, including reduced risk for chronic disease. The 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommend twice weekly consumption of varied seafood as a strategy to lower dietary saturated fat and sodium levels. However, almost 90% of Americans do not eat the recommended amounts of seafood. Additional education is warranted to boost seafood consumption and foster associated health and socioeconomic benefits.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine what educational modalities would encourage greater seafood consumption by Americans.

Study Design, Settings, Participants

This study examined barriers to access, cost, preparation, and consumer misconceptions about seafood. Participants who completed the 24 question pre survey were given either a $50 gift card to a local seafood market or $5 Visa card. Post-survey participants received a $5 Visa gift card.

Measurable Outcome/Analysis

Survey data was collected using Qualtrics to ascertain consumer attitudes about cost of seafood, health outcomes, access, sustainability, mercury perceptions, and purchasing habits.

Results

Participants (n=129) completed the pre survey and (n=107) the post survey. After using the gift card for a local fish monger, 76.12% of participants indicated they were encouraged to eat more seafood. Of those who indicated they did not feel encouraged to eat more seafood, 52.38% said they already ate enough seafood. Other objections to seafood consumption included: could not afford seafood, and personal preference issues like taste, texture, and smell. Participants also indicated educational materials that would encourage greater consumption included: recipes for seafood (13.82%), coupons to purchase less expensive seafood (14.82%), and information on purchasing seasonal seafood (8.04%).

Conclusions

This pilot study provided data to develop seafood nutrition education based on consumer preferences. It is intended to support curriculum development and assist with the expansion of supplemental information, while also acting as a potential driver for policy and systems change for increased seafood consumption and equitable access.

Funding

John and Anne Gerwig Director's Fund Award

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么美国人吃不到足够的海鲜?海鲜消费试点研究
背景经常食用海产品对人类健康有重要影响,包括降低慢性疾病风险。2020-2025 年美国人膳食指南》建议每周食用两次各种海产品,作为降低膳食中饱和脂肪和钠含量的一种策略。然而,近 90% 的美国人并没有吃到推荐量的海鲜。本研究的目的是确定何种教育方式能鼓励美国人更多地食用海鲜。研究设计、环境、参与者本研究调查了获取海鲜的障碍、成本、准备工作以及消费者对海鲜的误解。完成 24 个问题预调查的参与者可获得当地海鲜市场 50 美元的礼品卡或 5 美元的 Visa 卡。可衡量的结果/分析使用 Qualtrics 收集调查数据,以确定消费者对海鲜成本、健康结果、获取途径、可持续性、汞认知和购买习惯的态度。在使用了当地鱼贩的礼品卡后,76.12% 的参与者表示他们受到了鼓励,会吃更多的海鲜。在表示没有受到鼓励去吃更多海鲜的人中,52.38%的人表示他们已经吃了足够多的海鲜。其他反对食用海鲜的理由包括:买不起海鲜,以及个人喜好问题,如味道、口感和气味。参与者还表示,能够鼓励更多人食用海鲜的教育材料包括:海鲜食谱(13.82%)、购买价格较低海鲜的优惠券(14.82%)以及购买季节性海鲜的信息(8.04%)。该研究旨在支持课程开发,协助扩大补充信息,同时也是政策和系统变革的潜在驱动力,以增加海鲜消费和公平获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1