Ferric silicate precipitates relevant to geothermal systems: Delineation of their complex formation

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Geothermics Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1016/j.geothermics.2024.103118
Michaela Kamaratou , Argyro Spinthaki , Duygu Disci , Konstantinos D. Demadis
{"title":"Ferric silicate precipitates relevant to geothermal systems: Delineation of their complex formation","authors":"Michaela Kamaratou ,&nbsp;Argyro Spinthaki ,&nbsp;Duygu Disci ,&nbsp;Konstantinos D. Demadis","doi":"10.1016/j.geothermics.2024.103118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The interest in the utilization of geothermal energy has increased exponentially in the past few decades, and researchers internationally are currently focusing on improving harvesting methods and promoting it due to its numerous benefits compared to traditional energy sources. Corrosion and scaling are two of the significant problems in modern geothermal industry that occur during the harvesting of geothermal energy. Scaling occurs due to the variety of anions and cations that the majority of geothermal reservoir waters contain. High levels of dissolved Fe<sup>3+</sup> and silicate ions cause the formation of the elusive “iron silicate”, the latter term usually referring to ferric silicate. Its identity, as it is formed in geothermal waters, differs from its geological counterparts. Usually, deposits that contain Fe and Si are referred to as “iron silicate”, revealing very little about its true identity. This research is focused on revealing the true nature of the so-called “ferric silicate”, performing a series of synthesis experiments under various conditions that take into account iron and silicate concentrations (at the supersaturation regime), solution pH, temperature and different sources of iron. Although solutions containing 150 ppm silicate (no ferric) are stable and do not undergo any polycondensation at pH = 7.0, the presence of ferric induces variable silicate loss from solution. Its severity is enhanced as the ferric concentration increases. Ferric loss from solution in the presence of silicate ions is also severe, regardless of the silicate concentration. Both silicate and ferric loss from solution are pH-dependent processes, with a maximum observed around pH = 7.0. This loss is accompanied by precipitate formation, which is corroborated by turbidity measurements. The solubility of ferric silicate (under the conditions studied) increases with temperature. There is a roughly 4-fold solubility increase when the temperature is increased from 25 °C up to 220 °C. However, enhanced ferric incorporation into the final precipitate was observed at higher temperatures. The ferric silicate precipitates were characterized by several techniques, such as powder XRD, ATR-IR, SEM, and EDS, and showed that ferric silicate is an amorphous precipitate with variable Fe:Si atom ratios and a random Fe distribution throughout the solid. These results can serve as a roadmap for ferric silicate precipitation, taking into account the water chemistry of a specific scale-forming brine.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55095,"journal":{"name":"Geothermics","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 103118"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geothermics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375650524002050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The interest in the utilization of geothermal energy has increased exponentially in the past few decades, and researchers internationally are currently focusing on improving harvesting methods and promoting it due to its numerous benefits compared to traditional energy sources. Corrosion and scaling are two of the significant problems in modern geothermal industry that occur during the harvesting of geothermal energy. Scaling occurs due to the variety of anions and cations that the majority of geothermal reservoir waters contain. High levels of dissolved Fe3+ and silicate ions cause the formation of the elusive “iron silicate”, the latter term usually referring to ferric silicate. Its identity, as it is formed in geothermal waters, differs from its geological counterparts. Usually, deposits that contain Fe and Si are referred to as “iron silicate”, revealing very little about its true identity. This research is focused on revealing the true nature of the so-called “ferric silicate”, performing a series of synthesis experiments under various conditions that take into account iron and silicate concentrations (at the supersaturation regime), solution pH, temperature and different sources of iron. Although solutions containing 150 ppm silicate (no ferric) are stable and do not undergo any polycondensation at pH = 7.0, the presence of ferric induces variable silicate loss from solution. Its severity is enhanced as the ferric concentration increases. Ferric loss from solution in the presence of silicate ions is also severe, regardless of the silicate concentration. Both silicate and ferric loss from solution are pH-dependent processes, with a maximum observed around pH = 7.0. This loss is accompanied by precipitate formation, which is corroborated by turbidity measurements. The solubility of ferric silicate (under the conditions studied) increases with temperature. There is a roughly 4-fold solubility increase when the temperature is increased from 25 °C up to 220 °C. However, enhanced ferric incorporation into the final precipitate was observed at higher temperatures. The ferric silicate precipitates were characterized by several techniques, such as powder XRD, ATR-IR, SEM, and EDS, and showed that ferric silicate is an amorphous precipitate with variable Fe:Si atom ratios and a random Fe distribution throughout the solid. These results can serve as a roadmap for ferric silicate precipitation, taking into account the water chemistry of a specific scale-forming brine.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与地热系统有关的硅酸铁沉淀物:划分其复杂的形成过程
在过去的几十年里,人们对地热能利用的兴趣成倍增长,由于地热能与传统能源相比具有诸多优势,目前国际上的研究人员正致力于改进采集方法并推广地热能。腐蚀和结垢是现代地热工业在采集地热能过程中出现的两个重要问题。出现结垢的原因是大多数地热储层水含有各种阴阳离子。高浓度的溶解 Fe3+ 和硅酸盐离子会形成难以捉摸的 "硅酸铁",后者通常指硅酸铁。它在地热水域中形成的特性不同于其地质对应物。通常情况下,含有铁和硅的矿藏被称为 "硅酸铁",但对其真实身份却知之甚少。这项研究的重点是揭示所谓 "硅酸铁 "的真实性质,在考虑到铁和硅酸盐浓度(过饱和状态)、溶液 pH 值、温度和不同铁源的各种条件下进行了一系列合成实验。虽然含有 150 ppm 硅酸盐(不含铁元素)的溶液是稳定的,并且在 pH = 7.0 时不会发生任何缩聚反应,但铁元素的存在会导致溶液中硅酸盐的不同程度流失。其严重程度随着铁浓度的增加而加剧。无论硅酸盐浓度如何,在硅酸根离子存在的情况下,铁从溶液中流失的情况也很严重。硅酸盐和铁从溶液中流失的过程都与 pH 值有关,在 pH = 7.0 时达到最大值。这种损失伴随着沉淀的形成,这一点可以通过浊度测量得到证实。硅酸铁的溶解度(在研究条件下)随温度升高而增加。当温度从 25 °C 升至 220 °C 时,溶解度大约增加了 4 倍。不过,在较高温度下,最终沉淀中的铁掺入量增加。粉末 XRD、ATR-IR、SEM 和 EDS 等多种技术对硅酸铁沉淀物进行了表征,结果表明硅酸铁是一种无定形沉淀物,其铁:硅原子比可变,铁在整个固体中随机分布。考虑到特定成垢盐水的水化学性质,这些结果可作为硅酸铁沉淀的路线图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geothermics
Geothermics 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
237
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Geothermics is an international journal devoted to the research and development of geothermal energy. The International Board of Editors of Geothermics, which comprises specialists in the various aspects of geothermal resources, exploration and development, guarantees the balanced, comprehensive view of scientific and technological developments in this promising energy field. It promulgates the state of the art and science of geothermal energy, its exploration and exploitation through a regular exchange of information from all parts of the world. The journal publishes articles dealing with the theory, exploration techniques and all aspects of the utilization of geothermal resources. Geothermics serves as the scientific house, or exchange medium, through which the growing community of geothermal specialists can provide and receive information.
期刊最新文献
Study on the statistical damage constitutive model and experiment of hot dry rock cyclic heating-cooling based on the octahedral strength criterion A novel method for decoupling thermo-hydraulic processes from chemical reactions to understand the effect of heat on chemical reaction Fracture caging in a lab fault to prevent seismic rupture during fluid injection Surface heat loss assessment at the Waiotapu Geothermal Field, Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand Notably high salinity of geothermal water in the coastal area in Hainan Island, China, predominantly dominated by tectonic activities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1