Do learners learn from corrective peer feedback? Insights from students

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Studies in Educational Evaluation Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101385
{"title":"Do learners learn from corrective peer feedback? Insights from students","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Understanding what students do with the feedback they receive is paramount in the influence of feedback on the learning experience. Likewise, while research recommends peer feedback in classroom settings, understanding what students do with corrective peer feedback is instrumental in studying the impact of peer feedback on students learning. This study explored this understudied aspect of peer feedback through mixed-method research. One hundred fifty participants administered with peer feedback were recruited from 5 universities. After collecting data through questionnaires and interviews, it was analyzed. Results indicate that while corrective peer feedback is overly perceived as effective, students perceive it as an unfair and improper assessment model. Other novel findings were used to make pedagogical conclusions on this topic.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X24000646","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding what students do with the feedback they receive is paramount in the influence of feedback on the learning experience. Likewise, while research recommends peer feedback in classroom settings, understanding what students do with corrective peer feedback is instrumental in studying the impact of peer feedback on students learning. This study explored this understudied aspect of peer feedback through mixed-method research. One hundred fifty participants administered with peer feedback were recruited from 5 universities. After collecting data through questionnaires and interviews, it was analyzed. Results indicate that while corrective peer feedback is overly perceived as effective, students perceive it as an unfair and improper assessment model. Other novel findings were used to make pedagogical conclusions on this topic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习者会从同伴的纠正性反馈中学习吗?学生的见解
了解学生如何处理他们收到的反馈对反馈对学习体验的影响至关重要。同样,虽然研究建议在课堂环境中进行同伴反馈,但了解学生如何处理纠正性同伴反馈对于研究同伴反馈对学生学习的影响至关重要。本研究通过混合方法研究探讨了同伴反馈中未被充分研究的方面。研究从 5 所大学招募了 150 名接受同伴反馈的参与者。在通过问卷和访谈收集数据后,对数据进行了分析。结果表明,虽然纠正性同伴反馈被过度认为是有效的,但学生却认为这是一种不公平、不恰当的评估模式。其他新颖的研究结果也用于就此课题得出教学结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
90
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Studies in Educational Evaluation publishes original reports of evaluation studies. Four types of articles are published by the journal: (a) Empirical evaluation studies representing evaluation practice in educational systems around the world; (b) Theoretical reflections and empirical studies related to issues involved in the evaluation of educational programs, educational institutions, educational personnel and student assessment; (c) Articles summarizing the state-of-the-art concerning specific topics in evaluation in general or in a particular country or group of countries; (d) Book reviews and brief abstracts of evaluation studies.
期刊最新文献
Exploring factors influencing teacher self-efficacy in implementing inclusive education in Cambodia: A two-level hierarchical linear model What value do standardized observation systems add to summative teacher evaluation systems? Investigating anonymity in formative and summative peer assessment: Effects on university students’ social-affective factors, perceptions and preference Re-imagining educational quality. The need for a multidimensional approach in evaluating educational quality through TIMSS data Comparing the reliability of performance task scores obtained from rating scale and analytic rubric using the generalizability theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1