Gizem Toplu-Tutay, John J. Hasenbein, Erhan Kutanoglu
{"title":"Impact of power outages depends on who loses it: Equity-informed grid resilience planning via stochastic optimization","authors":"Gizem Toplu-Tutay, John J. Hasenbein, Erhan Kutanoglu","doi":"10.1016/j.seps.2024.102036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research presents a novel approach for enhancing power grid resilience with a focus on social equity in light of increasing natural disasters. Utilizing a two-stage stochastic optimization model for flood mitigation investments, we optimize substation hardening and power flow decisions to minimize the weighted combination of expected load shed and expected equity metric. Our method uniquely approximates community power outages stemming from transmission grid disruptions, sidestepping the complexities of the distribution grid, and it incorporates two equity metrics (affected population and duration of loss) to address the uneven postdisaster well-being loss across communities. Our approach’s novelty lies in integrating this equity-informed resilience model with realistic flood scenario generation and utilizing a large-scale synthetic but a realistic power grid of Texas. The findings highlight the importance of the composite objective function in altering power flow decisions to prioritize electricity provision and save communities in disadvantaged areas even without investing in substation hardening. The results also quantify the equity and load shed benefits of substation hardening as a function of the investment budget with a parameterized analysis. With an attention to equity, power outages increase in nonvulnerable communities — a trade-off made to mitigate well-being loss in the most vulnerable areas. We further explore a justice model inspired by the government’s Justice40 initiative but find it less effective than our equity-informed models at preventing well-being loss. Our research, enriched by a comprehensive sensitivity analysis, offers valuable insights for policymakers, grid operators, and utilities aiming for a more resilient and equitable power grid.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22033,"journal":{"name":"Socio-economic Planning Sciences","volume":"95 ","pages":"Article 102036"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socio-economic Planning Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012124002350","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This research presents a novel approach for enhancing power grid resilience with a focus on social equity in light of increasing natural disasters. Utilizing a two-stage stochastic optimization model for flood mitigation investments, we optimize substation hardening and power flow decisions to minimize the weighted combination of expected load shed and expected equity metric. Our method uniquely approximates community power outages stemming from transmission grid disruptions, sidestepping the complexities of the distribution grid, and it incorporates two equity metrics (affected population and duration of loss) to address the uneven postdisaster well-being loss across communities. Our approach’s novelty lies in integrating this equity-informed resilience model with realistic flood scenario generation and utilizing a large-scale synthetic but a realistic power grid of Texas. The findings highlight the importance of the composite objective function in altering power flow decisions to prioritize electricity provision and save communities in disadvantaged areas even without investing in substation hardening. The results also quantify the equity and load shed benefits of substation hardening as a function of the investment budget with a parameterized analysis. With an attention to equity, power outages increase in nonvulnerable communities — a trade-off made to mitigate well-being loss in the most vulnerable areas. We further explore a justice model inspired by the government’s Justice40 initiative but find it less effective than our equity-informed models at preventing well-being loss. Our research, enriched by a comprehensive sensitivity analysis, offers valuable insights for policymakers, grid operators, and utilities aiming for a more resilient and equitable power grid.
期刊介绍:
Studies directed toward the more effective utilization of existing resources, e.g. mathematical programming models of health care delivery systems with relevance to more effective program design; systems analysis of fire outbreaks and its relevance to the location of fire stations; statistical analysis of the efficiency of a developing country economy or industry.
Studies relating to the interaction of various segments of society and technology, e.g. the effects of government health policies on the utilization and design of hospital facilities; the relationship between housing density and the demands on public transportation or other service facilities: patterns and implications of urban development and air or water pollution.
Studies devoted to the anticipations of and response to future needs for social, health and other human services, e.g. the relationship between industrial growth and the development of educational resources in affected areas; investigation of future demands for material and child health resources in a developing country; design of effective recycling in an urban setting.