Legal boundaries: Ensuring protection amidst threats to the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant in the Ukraine

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2024-07-27 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103700
{"title":"Legal boundaries: Ensuring protection amidst threats to the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant in the Ukraine","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article aims to examine the protection accorded to nuclear power plants in international law, based on the example of the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant in the context of the current Russian aggression against Ukraine and the ensuing international armed conflict. The authors attempt to answer the question of the legality of the attacks against the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant. The research methods used are institutional-legal analysis and, supplementarily, a critical literature analysis. The institutional-legal analysis focuses on the examination of international treaties like Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions, which constitutes the main legal reference point in this article, as well as on other documents that may not be binding (such as resolutions adopted by the International Atomic Energy Agency's General Conference or the Board of Governors, as well as statements and reports of other International Atomic Energy Agency's and United Nations' bodies). The main conclusion is that Russian attacks against the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant were and continue to be illegal on multiple fronts. While the legal regulations appear adequate and capable of meeting the challenge posed by Russian attacks and occupation of the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant, the problem lies with the political will of Russia to respect these rules.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002913","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims to examine the protection accorded to nuclear power plants in international law, based on the example of the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant in the context of the current Russian aggression against Ukraine and the ensuing international armed conflict. The authors attempt to answer the question of the legality of the attacks against the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant. The research methods used are institutional-legal analysis and, supplementarily, a critical literature analysis. The institutional-legal analysis focuses on the examination of international treaties like Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions, which constitutes the main legal reference point in this article, as well as on other documents that may not be binding (such as resolutions adopted by the International Atomic Energy Agency's General Conference or the Board of Governors, as well as statements and reports of other International Atomic Energy Agency's and United Nations' bodies). The main conclusion is that Russian attacks against the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant were and continue to be illegal on multiple fronts. While the legal regulations appear adequate and capable of meeting the challenge posed by Russian attacks and occupation of the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant, the problem lies with the political will of Russia to respect these rules.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法律边界:确保在乌克兰扎波罗热核电站受到威胁时提供保护
本文旨在以扎波罗热核电厂为例,结合当前俄罗斯对乌克兰的侵略以及随之而来的国际武装冲突,探讨国际法给予核电厂的保护。作者试图回答攻击扎波罗热核电站的合法性问题。所采用的研究方法包括制度法律分析和批判性文献分析。制度-法律分析侧重于对《日内瓦四公约第一附加议定书》等国际条约(构成本文的主要法律参考点)以及其他可能不具有约束力的文件(如国际原子能机构大会或理事会通过的决议,以及国际原子能机构和联合国其他机构的声明和报告)的审查。主要结论是,俄罗斯对 Zaporizhzhya 核电站的攻击在多个方面都是非法的,而且仍然是非法的。虽然法律规定似乎是充分的,能够应对俄罗斯袭击和占领扎波罗热核电厂所带来的挑战,但问题在于俄罗斯是否有遵守这些规定的政治意愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Juggling the basics: How much does an income increase affect energy spending of low-income households in England? The informality-energy innovation-finance nexus: Sustainable business models for microgrid-based off-grid urban energy access The future of fossil fuels, chemicals, and feedstocks: Outlining a research agenda on the role of China in the global petrochemical industry Green hydrogen transitions deepen socioecological risks and extractivist patterns: evidence from 28 prospective exporting countries in the Global South Unpacking travel needs and experiences: Insights from qualitative interviews with affordable housing residents in California
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1