Artificial intelligence and innovation management: Charting the evolving landscape

IF 11.1 1区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Technovation Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103081
Deborah L. Roberts , Marina Candi
{"title":"Artificial intelligence and innovation management: Charting the evolving landscape","authors":"Deborah L. Roberts ,&nbsp;Marina Candi","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The excitement surrounding Artificial Intelligence (AI) is palpable. It is rapidly gaining prevalence in academia, business, and personal use. In particular, the emergence of generative AI, exemplified by large language models such as ChatGPT, has been marked by substantial media attention, discourse, and hype. Like most, if not all, aspects of business, innovation processes have been impacted. However, little is known about the degree of impact or the benefits that might be gained. To cut through the hype and understand the use of AI in innovation processes in businesses today, a large-scale survey amongst innovation managers in the USA was conducted, followed by interviews. The findings indicate that the use of AI in innovation processes is high and widespread, with AI being used for more than half of the surveyed firms' innovation projects. Furthermore, AI is used more in the development stage of the innovation process than in the idea or commercialization stages, which counters much of the existing discourse, which focuses on the idea stage. We uncover interesting differences by comparing the use and impact of generative AI with that of more traditional AI. Among these is a significant difference in expected benefits in making employees’ jobs more fulfilling — managers believe generative AI is more likely to confer this benefit than traditional AI. This paper offers two valuable contributions. First, it enriches the evolving dialogue at the intersection of AI and innovation management by offering much-needed empirical evidence about practical applications. Second, it provides timely managerial implications by examining relationships between the use of AI and innovation performance and understanding the benefits that AI can confer in the innovation process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":"136 ","pages":"Article 103081"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224001317","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The excitement surrounding Artificial Intelligence (AI) is palpable. It is rapidly gaining prevalence in academia, business, and personal use. In particular, the emergence of generative AI, exemplified by large language models such as ChatGPT, has been marked by substantial media attention, discourse, and hype. Like most, if not all, aspects of business, innovation processes have been impacted. However, little is known about the degree of impact or the benefits that might be gained. To cut through the hype and understand the use of AI in innovation processes in businesses today, a large-scale survey amongst innovation managers in the USA was conducted, followed by interviews. The findings indicate that the use of AI in innovation processes is high and widespread, with AI being used for more than half of the surveyed firms' innovation projects. Furthermore, AI is used more in the development stage of the innovation process than in the idea or commercialization stages, which counters much of the existing discourse, which focuses on the idea stage. We uncover interesting differences by comparing the use and impact of generative AI with that of more traditional AI. Among these is a significant difference in expected benefits in making employees’ jobs more fulfilling — managers believe generative AI is more likely to confer this benefit than traditional AI. This paper offers two valuable contributions. First, it enriches the evolving dialogue at the intersection of AI and innovation management by offering much-needed empirical evidence about practical applications. Second, it provides timely managerial implications by examining relationships between the use of AI and innovation performance and understanding the benefits that AI can confer in the innovation process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能与创新管理:描绘不断变化的前景
围绕人工智能(AI)的兴奋之情溢于言表。它在学术界、商业界和个人生活中迅速普及。特别是以 ChatGPT 等大型语言模型为代表的生成式人工智能的出现,引起了大量媒体的关注、讨论和炒作。与大多数(如果不是全部的话)商业活动一样,创新过程也受到了影响。然而,人们对其影响程度或可能获得的收益知之甚少。为了透过炒作了解人工智能在当今企业创新流程中的应用,我们对美国的创新经理进行了一次大规模调查,随后进行了访谈。调查结果表明,人工智能在创新过程中的使用率很高,而且非常广泛,半数以上受访企业的创新项目都使用了人工智能。此外,人工智能更多地被用于创新过程的开发阶段,而不是创意或商业化阶段,这与现有的侧重于创意阶段的论述大相径庭。通过比较生成式人工智能与传统人工智能的使用和影响,我们发现了有趣的差异。其中,在使员工的工作更有成就感的预期效益方面存在显著差异--管理者认为生成式人工智能比传统人工智能更有可能带来这种效益。本文有两个宝贵贡献。首先,它通过提供急需的实际应用经验证据,丰富了人工智能与创新管理交叉领域不断发展的对话。其次,本文通过研究人工智能的使用与创新绩效之间的关系,以及了解人工智能在创新过程中可能带来的益处,及时提供了管理方面的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Technovation
Technovation 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
11.20%
发文量
208
审稿时长
91 days
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.
期刊最新文献
Capturing the breadth of value creation with science fiction storytelling: Evidence from smart service design workshops A classification framework for generative artificial intelligence for social good Digital technology and innovation:The impact of blockchain application on enterprise innovation Exploring and investigating the complementarity and multidimensionality of innovation for sustainability research: Past present and future Facilitator or figurehead? The impact of academician shareholder on corporate innovation: Evidence from China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1