Prediction of compressive strength of recycled concrete using gradient boosting models

IF 6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Ain Shams Engineering Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1016/j.asej.2024.102975
Amira Hamdy Ali Ahmed , Wu Jin , Mosaad Ali Hussein Ali
{"title":"Prediction of compressive strength of recycled concrete using gradient boosting models","authors":"Amira Hamdy Ali Ahmed ,&nbsp;Wu Jin ,&nbsp;Mosaad Ali Hussein Ali","doi":"10.1016/j.asej.2024.102975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The construction industry is shifting towards sustainability, emphasizing the need for innovative materials. Recycled Aggregate Concrete (RAC), utilizing recycled aggregates, emerges as a promising eco-friendly solution to minimize waste and resource utilization. However, accurately predicting its compressive strength (CS) is challenging due to varying composition and properties. This study addresses this issue by employing machine learning models, specifically five gradient boosting algorithms: Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), LightGBM, XGBoost, Categorical Gradient Boost (CGB), and HistGradientBoosting (HGB). A total of 314 mixes from relevant published literature were aggregated to train the models. These models are meticulously fine-tuned through hyperparameter optimization for optimal predictive performance. The study also introduces SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) algorithms for model interpretability, elucidating feature contributions to predictions. The results revealed that among the five gradient boosting models, CGB demonstrated the highest R2 value of 92% on the testing set, while LightGBM exhibited the lowest Coefficient of Determination (R2) value of 88%. Additionally, CGB achieved the lowest Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of approximately 4.05, whereas XGBoost showed the highest RMSE of around 4.8. Furthermore, for Mean Absolute Error (MAE), LightGBM recorded the lowest value of approximately 3.16, while HGB yielded the highest MAE of about 3.8. The SHAP analyses reveal influential features impacting RAC strength, highlighting the significance of cement, water, sand, and recycled aggregate water absorption in predicting RAC compressive strength.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48648,"journal":{"name":"Ain Shams Engineering Journal","volume":"15 9","pages":"Article 102975"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090447924003502/pdfft?md5=896e649ced247c47e0f5b708d9405e8f&pid=1-s2.0-S2090447924003502-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ain Shams Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090447924003502","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The construction industry is shifting towards sustainability, emphasizing the need for innovative materials. Recycled Aggregate Concrete (RAC), utilizing recycled aggregates, emerges as a promising eco-friendly solution to minimize waste and resource utilization. However, accurately predicting its compressive strength (CS) is challenging due to varying composition and properties. This study addresses this issue by employing machine learning models, specifically five gradient boosting algorithms: Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), LightGBM, XGBoost, Categorical Gradient Boost (CGB), and HistGradientBoosting (HGB). A total of 314 mixes from relevant published literature were aggregated to train the models. These models are meticulously fine-tuned through hyperparameter optimization for optimal predictive performance. The study also introduces SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) algorithms for model interpretability, elucidating feature contributions to predictions. The results revealed that among the five gradient boosting models, CGB demonstrated the highest R2 value of 92% on the testing set, while LightGBM exhibited the lowest Coefficient of Determination (R2) value of 88%. Additionally, CGB achieved the lowest Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of approximately 4.05, whereas XGBoost showed the highest RMSE of around 4.8. Furthermore, for Mean Absolute Error (MAE), LightGBM recorded the lowest value of approximately 3.16, while HGB yielded the highest MAE of about 3.8. The SHAP analyses reveal influential features impacting RAC strength, highlighting the significance of cement, water, sand, and recycled aggregate water absorption in predicting RAC compressive strength.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用梯度提升模型预测再生混凝土的抗压强度
建筑业正朝着可持续发展的方向转变,强调对创新材料的需求。再生骨料混凝土(RAC)利用再生骨料,是一种有前途的生态友好型解决方案,可最大限度地减少废物和资源利用。然而,由于其成分和性能各不相同,准确预测其抗压强度(CS)具有挑战性。本研究采用机器学习模型,特别是五种梯度提升算法来解决这一问题:梯度提升机(GBM)、LightGBM、XGBoost、分类梯度提升(CGB)和 HistGradientBoosting(HGB)。为了训练这些模型,我们汇总了相关发表文献中的 314 种混合数据。这些模型通过超参数优化进行了细致的微调,以获得最佳预测性能。研究还引入了 SHAP(SHapley Additive exPlanations)算法,以提高模型的可解释性,阐明特征对预测的贡献。结果显示,在五个梯度提升模型中,CGB 在测试集上的 R2 值最高,达到 92%,而 LightGBM 的判定系数 (R2) 值最低,为 88%。此外,CGB 的均方根误差(RMSE)最低,约为 4.05,而 XGBoost 的 RMSE 最高,约为 4.8。此外,在平均绝对误差 (MAE) 方面,LightGBM 的值最低,约为 3.16,而 HGB 的 MAE 最高,约为 3.8。SHAP 分析揭示了对 RAC 强度有影响的特征,突出了水泥、水、砂和再生骨料吸水率在预测 RAC 抗压强度方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ain Shams Engineering Journal
Ain Shams Engineering Journal Engineering-General Engineering
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
441
审稿时长
49 weeks
期刊介绍: in Shams Engineering Journal is an international journal devoted to publication of peer reviewed original high-quality research papers and review papers in both traditional topics and those of emerging science and technology. Areas of both theoretical and fundamental interest as well as those concerning industrial applications, emerging instrumental techniques and those which have some practical application to an aspect of human endeavor, such as the preservation of the environment, health, waste disposal are welcome. The overall focus is on original and rigorous scientific research results which have generic significance. Ain Shams Engineering Journal focuses upon aspects of mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, civil engineering, chemical engineering, petroleum engineering, environmental engineering, architectural and urban planning engineering. Papers in which knowledge from other disciplines is integrated with engineering are especially welcome like nanotechnology, material sciences, and computational methods as well as applied basic sciences: engineering mathematics, physics and chemistry.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Study on the intermediate crack-induced debonding strain of FRP-strengthened concrete members using the updated BP neural network An Improved digital multi-resonant controller for 3 ϕ grid-tied and standalone PV system under balanced and unbalanced conditions Common architectural characteristics of traditional courtyard houses in Erbil city Analysis of Monte-Carlo collision method with argon and helium background gases at different RF-powers and pressures in ELTRAP device
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1