A conceptual analysis of collaboration in information literacy librarianship

IF 2.5 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Journal of Academic Librarianship Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102934
Amy Andres , Tatiana Usova
{"title":"A conceptual analysis of collaboration in information literacy librarianship","authors":"Amy Andres ,&nbsp;Tatiana Usova","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Collaboration is a widely used term in academic libraries to describe different types of interaction with campus partners. The library literature presents an extensive history of publications that feature academic library collaboration with discipline faculty in the context of teaching. While the outcomes of teaching librarians' collaborative practices are well documented, the lack of clarity in distinguishing collaboration from other forms of workplace interaction has impeded a comprehensive understanding of teaching librarians' experiences. To improve the understanding of librarians' collaborative practices, and to build a foundation on which further research can be generated, a Pragmatic Utility concept analysis is conducted through an integrative study of peer-reviewed literature. The analysis presents an examination of collaboration between teaching librarians and discipline faculty through five dimensions including <em>definitions, antecedents, attributes, boundaries, and outcomes</em>. An additional dimension, <em>social dynamics</em>, was further identified and applied as a lens for analysis. The conclusion is that collaboration remains a partially immature concept in the library literature, and more studies are needed to establish a clear definition and a solid theoretical framework to guide professional research forward.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"50 5","pages":"Article 102934"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133324000958","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Collaboration is a widely used term in academic libraries to describe different types of interaction with campus partners. The library literature presents an extensive history of publications that feature academic library collaboration with discipline faculty in the context of teaching. While the outcomes of teaching librarians' collaborative practices are well documented, the lack of clarity in distinguishing collaboration from other forms of workplace interaction has impeded a comprehensive understanding of teaching librarians' experiences. To improve the understanding of librarians' collaborative practices, and to build a foundation on which further research can be generated, a Pragmatic Utility concept analysis is conducted through an integrative study of peer-reviewed literature. The analysis presents an examination of collaboration between teaching librarians and discipline faculty through five dimensions including definitions, antecedents, attributes, boundaries, and outcomes. An additional dimension, social dynamics, was further identified and applied as a lens for analysis. The conclusion is that collaboration remains a partially immature concept in the library literature, and more studies are needed to establish a clear definition and a solid theoretical framework to guide professional research forward.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信息扫盲图书馆员协作的概念分析
合作是学术图书馆广泛使用的一个术语,用来描述与校园合作伙伴的不同类型的互动。图书馆文献中有大量的出版物介绍了学术图书馆与学科教师在教学方面的合作。虽然教学图书馆员的合作实践成果有据可查,但在区分合作与其他形式的工作场所互动方面缺乏明确性,这阻碍了对教学图书馆员经验的全面了解。为了加深对图书馆员合作实践的理解,并为进一步的研究奠定基础,我们通过对同行评议文献的综合研究,进行了实用工具概念分析。该分析通过定义、前因、属性、边界和结果等五个维度对教学图书馆员与学科教师之间的合作进行了研究。此外,还进一步确定了社会动态这一维度,并将其作为分析的视角。结论是,在图书馆文献中,合作仍然是一个部分不成熟的概念,需要更多的研究来建立一个明确的定义和坚实的理论框架,以指导专业研究向前发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Academic Librarianship
Journal of Academic Librarianship INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Academic Librarianship, an international and refereed journal, publishes articles that focus on problems and issues germane to college and university libraries. JAL provides a forum for authors to present research findings and, where applicable, their practical applications and significance; analyze policies, practices, issues, and trends; speculate about the future of academic librarianship; present analytical bibliographic essays and philosophical treatises. JAL also brings to the attention of its readers information about hundreds of new and recently published books in library and information science, management, scholarly communication, and higher education. JAL, in addition, covers management and discipline-based software and information policy developments.
期刊最新文献
What makes students tick? Exploring factors that affect learner motivations and challenges when engaging with optional library workshops on data literacy From grades to growth: Understanding undergraduate perceptions of academic success Curricular support, equipment lending, and a defense of evolving classic library services Promoting citizen science through academic libraries in the US: A study on LibGuides Undergraduate research symposium: Vital component in undergraduates' research journey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1