The benefits of cultural confrontation: Does the experience of cultural heterogeneity predict individual differences in accommodative regulation?

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL International Journal of Intercultural Relations Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.102017
{"title":"The benefits of cultural confrontation: Does the experience of cultural heterogeneity predict individual differences in accommodative regulation?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.102017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Intercultural interactions and encounters offer valuable opportunities not only for cultural exchange and mutual stimulation but also for individual development. The central assumption of the current research is that cultural heterogeneity is a supporting condition for the development of flexibility in goal adjustment (FGA). We used measures for linguistic heterogeneity (i.e., number of languages, language switching, degree of multilingualism), cultural heterogeneity (i.e., cultural frame switching, alternating thinking style, hybrid thinking style, engagement with cultures, contact to cultures, number of cultures, migration background), and heterogeneity regarding living conditions (i.e., siblings, relocation) to predict FGA in an online-sample of 348 individuals using a forward linear regression. Engagement with cultures and hybrid thinking style positively and language switching negatively predicted flexible goal adjustment, while all other variables did not. The findings suggest that the adaptive performance required in heterogeneous sociocultural encounters and relations can be a supportive developmental condition for FGA. The same seems not to be valid for pure linguistic heterogeneity or heterogeneity of living conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48216,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176724000865/pdfft?md5=04087b6ee506769ed5abb68665711ae3&pid=1-s2.0-S0147176724000865-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176724000865","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intercultural interactions and encounters offer valuable opportunities not only for cultural exchange and mutual stimulation but also for individual development. The central assumption of the current research is that cultural heterogeneity is a supporting condition for the development of flexibility in goal adjustment (FGA). We used measures for linguistic heterogeneity (i.e., number of languages, language switching, degree of multilingualism), cultural heterogeneity (i.e., cultural frame switching, alternating thinking style, hybrid thinking style, engagement with cultures, contact to cultures, number of cultures, migration background), and heterogeneity regarding living conditions (i.e., siblings, relocation) to predict FGA in an online-sample of 348 individuals using a forward linear regression. Engagement with cultures and hybrid thinking style positively and language switching negatively predicted flexible goal adjustment, while all other variables did not. The findings suggest that the adaptive performance required in heterogeneous sociocultural encounters and relations can be a supportive developmental condition for FGA. The same seems not to be valid for pure linguistic heterogeneity or heterogeneity of living conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文化对抗的益处:文化异质性的经历是否预示着适应性调节的个体差异?
文化间的互动和接触不仅为文化交流和相互激励提供了宝贵的机会,也为个人发展提供了宝贵的机会。当前研究的核心假设是,文化异质性是培养目标调整灵活性(FGA)的辅助条件。我们使用了语言异质性(即语言数量、语言转换、多语程度)、文化异质性(即文化框架转换、交替思维方式、混合思维方式、文化参与、文化接触、文化数量、移民背景)和生活条件异质性(即兄弟姐妹、异地居住)的测量指标,通过正向线性回归预测了 348 个在线样本中的 FGA。参与文化和混合思维方式对灵活目标调整有积极的预测作用,而语言转换对灵活目标调整有消极的预测作用。研究结果表明,异质社会文化接触和关系中所需的适应性表现可以成为 FGA 的支持性发展条件。而对于纯粹的语言异质性或生活条件的异质性来说,情况似乎并非如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: IJIR is dedicated to advancing knowledge and understanding of theory, practice, and research in intergroup relations. The contents encompass theoretical developments, field-based evaluations of training techniques, empirical discussions of cultural similarities and differences, and critical descriptions of new training approaches. Papers selected for publication in IJIR are judged to increase our understanding of intergroup tensions and harmony. Issue-oriented and cross-discipline discussion is encouraged. The highest priority is given to manuscripts that join theory, practice, and field research design. By theory, we mean conceptual schemes focused on the nature of cultural differences and similarities.
期刊最新文献
Academic adaptation of international students in the chinese higher education environment: A case study with mixed methods Bright and dark sides: Does collective behavior past participation experience affect participation willingness? Sense of belongingness, discrimination, and mental health: Associations and buffering effects of sense of belonging on mental health among Finnish native and immigrant-origin youth Sea turtles stranded ashore: Sociocultural dissonance and identity conflicts in migration intentions of Chinese international student returnees 50+ years of psychological acculturation research: Progress and challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1