Do immigrants know less than natives about cancer screening tests? – the case of Netherlands

IF 3.9 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Migration and Health Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jmh.2024.100258
Dr Jelena Arsenijevic , Dr Verena Seibel
{"title":"Do immigrants know less than natives about cancer screening tests? – the case of Netherlands","authors":"Dr Jelena Arsenijevic ,&nbsp;Dr Verena Seibel","doi":"10.1016/j.jmh.2024.100258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The Netherlands was one of the first countries in Europe to offer breast, colorectal and cervical cancer screening tests free of charge. Yet, a significant share of migrants in the Netherlands forgo the use of these preventive screenings. Qualitative research suggests, that lack of system knowledge on how the healthcare system operates (e.g. age eligibility of cancer screenings), is one factor contributing to this underuse among migrants. However, little is known about the extent to which migrants differ from natives in their system knowledge and about potential causes of this ethnic gap. The contribution of this study is therefore twofold: First, we examine whether migrants in the Netherlands have lower system knowledge regarding cancer screenings than the natives. Second, we examine which factors explain potential ethnic differences in system knowledge between migrants and non-migrants.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Using the Longitudinal Internet Study for Social Sciences (LISS), we matched newly collected data on system knowledge about healthcare with Health module (wave 14). To assess the difference in system knowledge among migrants and non-migrants, while taking into account potential selection bias, we applied propensity score matching, one-to-one matching procedure with no replacement. We compared first generation non - Western migrants (FNWM) and second-generation non-western migrants (SNWM) with their most similar non-migrants group regarding their knowledge about breast, colorectal, and cervical screening. A Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition with non-matched samples was used to examine which factors can explain the differences in system knowledge among migrants and non-migrants.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Our results show that first generation migrants have lower system knowledge about all three screening tests, while second generation migrants differ from non-migrants only with regard to knowledge about breast and colorectal cancer screenings. The ethnic differences found are not caused by personal or social factors such as education or income.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We recommend Dutch healthcare policy makes to focus in the strengthen of cancer screening system knowledge among migrant populations in order to increase their participation in these screening programs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34448,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Migration and Health","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100258"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666623524000473/pdfft?md5=73732445eca0d6bde61f8ee0f5aa2abb&pid=1-s2.0-S2666623524000473-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Migration and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666623524000473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The Netherlands was one of the first countries in Europe to offer breast, colorectal and cervical cancer screening tests free of charge. Yet, a significant share of migrants in the Netherlands forgo the use of these preventive screenings. Qualitative research suggests, that lack of system knowledge on how the healthcare system operates (e.g. age eligibility of cancer screenings), is one factor contributing to this underuse among migrants. However, little is known about the extent to which migrants differ from natives in their system knowledge and about potential causes of this ethnic gap. The contribution of this study is therefore twofold: First, we examine whether migrants in the Netherlands have lower system knowledge regarding cancer screenings than the natives. Second, we examine which factors explain potential ethnic differences in system knowledge between migrants and non-migrants.

Method

Using the Longitudinal Internet Study for Social Sciences (LISS), we matched newly collected data on system knowledge about healthcare with Health module (wave 14). To assess the difference in system knowledge among migrants and non-migrants, while taking into account potential selection bias, we applied propensity score matching, one-to-one matching procedure with no replacement. We compared first generation non - Western migrants (FNWM) and second-generation non-western migrants (SNWM) with their most similar non-migrants group regarding their knowledge about breast, colorectal, and cervical screening. A Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition with non-matched samples was used to examine which factors can explain the differences in system knowledge among migrants and non-migrants.

Results

Our results show that first generation migrants have lower system knowledge about all three screening tests, while second generation migrants differ from non-migrants only with regard to knowledge about breast and colorectal cancer screenings. The ethnic differences found are not caused by personal or social factors such as education or income.

Conclusion

We recommend Dutch healthcare policy makes to focus in the strengthen of cancer screening system knowledge among migrant populations in order to increase their participation in these screening programs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
移民对癌症筛查测试的了解比本地人少吗?- 荷兰的案例
导言荷兰是欧洲最早免费提供乳腺癌、结直肠癌和宫颈癌筛查的国家之一。然而,荷兰有相当一部分移民放弃了这些预防性筛查。定性研究表明,对医疗保健系统的运作方式(如癌症筛查的年龄资格)缺乏系统了解,是导致移民使用不足的一个因素。然而,人们对移民与本地人在系统知识方面的差异程度以及造成这种种族差距的潜在原因知之甚少。因此,本研究有两方面的贡献:首先,我们研究了荷兰移民在癌症筛查方面的系统知识是否低于本地人。第二,我们研究了哪些因素可以解释移民和非移民在系统知识方面的潜在种族差异。方法利用社会科学纵向互联网研究(LISS),我们将新收集的有关医疗保健系统知识的数据与健康模块(第 14 波)进行了比对。为了评估移民和非移民在系统知识方面的差异,同时考虑到潜在的选择偏差,我们采用了倾向得分匹配、一对一匹配和无替换程序。我们比较了第一代非西方移民(FNWM)和第二代非西方移民(SNWM)与最相似的非移民群体对乳腺癌、结直肠癌和宫颈癌筛查的了解程度。结果表明,第一代移民对所有三种筛查的系统知识了解较少,而第二代移民仅在乳腺癌和结直肠癌筛查知识方面与非移民存在差异。结论我们建议荷兰医疗保健政策制定者重点加强移民人口对癌症筛查系统知识的了解,以提高他们对这些筛查项目的参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Migration and Health
Journal of Migration and Health Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
65
审稿时长
153 days
期刊最新文献
Social connections related to health and well-being needs identified by children and adolescents affected by displacement in Lebanon: a participatory research study Violence Against Women and its Effects on Mental Health and Quality of Life: A Study of Myanmar Migrant Workers in Central Thailand Everyday discrimination, co-ethnic social support and mood changes in young adult immigrants in Germany–Evidence from an ecological momentary assessment study Factors contributing to the mental wellbeing of Afghan migrants in Iran during the COVID-19 pandemic Exploring the impact of preconception care and unintended pregnancy on access to antenatal healthcare services among Rohingya women: Insights from a cross-sectional survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1