Identification of high-performing soil groups in grazing lands using a multivariate analysis method

I.P. Senanayake , I.-Y. Yeo , N.J. Robinson , P.G. Dahlhaus , G.R. Hancock
{"title":"Identification of high-performing soil groups in grazing lands using a multivariate analysis method","authors":"I.P. Senanayake ,&nbsp;I.-Y. Yeo ,&nbsp;N.J. Robinson ,&nbsp;P.G. Dahlhaus ,&nbsp;G.R. Hancock","doi":"10.1016/j.soisec.2024.100163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Understanding and quantifying the complex relationships between soil properties and vegetation health is important for sustainable land management and optimising agricultural productivity. This study tested a spatial data-driven framework to identify the soil groups associated with pasture health using publicly available gridded soil attribute layers from Soil and Landscape Grid of Australia (SLGA) over two adjacent southeast Australian river catchments. Principal component analysis (PCA) followed by isocluster unsupervised classification was applied to seventeen SLGA soil attribute layers to identify dominant soil patterns, which showed good spatial agreement with the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) data derived from Landsat-8 imagery. The soil class demonstrating the highest EVI values (HVR class) and the lowest EVI values (LVR class) were determined. A comparison of these classes with soil types defined in the New South Wales Soil Landscape maps confirmed that the HVR class is predominated by agriculturally productive, basalt-derived 'Ant Hill' soils. The cation exchange capacity (CEC) ranging from ∼10 to 20 meq/100 g, clay content ranging from 20 % to 30 %, pHc (pH in calcium chloride solution) between 5 and 6, pHw (pH in water) between 5.5 and 6.5 and SOC between 2.5 % to 4 % were associated with higher EVI values in the HVR soil class within the study area. This study demonstrated an effective framework for identifying key soil attributes that affect agricultural productivity and pinpointing critical locations for grazing land productivity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74839,"journal":{"name":"Soil security","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006224000376/pdfft?md5=3660c1c996644618f0397fb491a4b68c&pid=1-s2.0-S2667006224000376-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006224000376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding and quantifying the complex relationships between soil properties and vegetation health is important for sustainable land management and optimising agricultural productivity. This study tested a spatial data-driven framework to identify the soil groups associated with pasture health using publicly available gridded soil attribute layers from Soil and Landscape Grid of Australia (SLGA) over two adjacent southeast Australian river catchments. Principal component analysis (PCA) followed by isocluster unsupervised classification was applied to seventeen SLGA soil attribute layers to identify dominant soil patterns, which showed good spatial agreement with the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) data derived from Landsat-8 imagery. The soil class demonstrating the highest EVI values (HVR class) and the lowest EVI values (LVR class) were determined. A comparison of these classes with soil types defined in the New South Wales Soil Landscape maps confirmed that the HVR class is predominated by agriculturally productive, basalt-derived 'Ant Hill' soils. The cation exchange capacity (CEC) ranging from ∼10 to 20 meq/100 g, clay content ranging from 20 % to 30 %, pHc (pH in calcium chloride solution) between 5 and 6, pHw (pH in water) between 5.5 and 6.5 and SOC between 2.5 % to 4 % were associated with higher EVI values in the HVR soil class within the study area. This study demonstrated an effective framework for identifying key soil attributes that affect agricultural productivity and pinpointing critical locations for grazing land productivity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用多元分析方法识别牧场中的高效土壤组群
了解和量化土壤特性与植被健康之间的复杂关系对于可持续土地管理和优化农业生产力非常重要。本研究测试了一个空间数据驱动框架,利用澳大利亚土壤与景观网格(SLGA)中公开提供的网格土壤属性层,对澳大利亚东南部两个相邻的河流流域进行了测试,以确定与牧场健康相关的土壤类别。对 17 个 SLGA 土壤属性层进行了主成分分析(PCA),然后进行了等集群无监督分类,以确定主要的土壤模式,这些模式与 Landsat-8 图像中的增强植被指数(EVI)数据显示出良好的空间一致性。确定了 EVI 值最高的土壤等级(HVR 等级)和 EVI 值最低的土壤等级(LVR 等级)。将这些等级与新南威尔士州土壤地貌图中定义的土壤类型进行比较后确认,HVR 等级主要是农业高产的玄武岩 "蚂蚁山 "土壤。阳离子交换容量(CEC)在 10 至 20 meq/100 g 之间,粘土含量在 20 % 至 30 % 之间,pHc(氯化钙溶液中的 pH 值)在 5 至 6 之间,pHw(水中的 pH 值)在 5.5 至 6.5 之间,SOC 在 2.5 % 至 4 % 之间。这项研究展示了一个有效的框架,可用于识别影响农业生产力的关键土壤属性,并确定牧场生产力的关键位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil security
Soil security Soil Science
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
90 days
期刊最新文献
Heavy metal pollution in farmland soils surrounding mining areas in China and the response of soil microbial communities Integration of indigenous and formal knowledge in the assessment of soil quality performance assessment using multiple factor analysis in Alborz central mountains Medium-term economic impacts of cover crop adoption in Maryland Using MIR and XRF spectroscopy to develop a heavy metal leaching potential model in Irish top soils Erratum regarding missing Conflict of Interest (COI) Statements in previously published articles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1