Systematic review of life cycle assessments on carbon emissions in the transportation system

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Impact Assessment Review Pub Date : 2024-08-11 DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107618
Weiwei Zhang , Yunfan Li , Hanfeng Li , Shiyong Liu , Jiayu Zhang , Ying Kong
{"title":"Systematic review of life cycle assessments on carbon emissions in the transportation system","authors":"Weiwei Zhang ,&nbsp;Yunfan Li ,&nbsp;Hanfeng Li ,&nbsp;Shiyong Liu ,&nbsp;Jiayu Zhang ,&nbsp;Ying Kong","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The transportation sector significantly contributes to carbon emissions, prompting a surge in research on emission reduction. Carbon estimation methods include bottom-up, top-down, and life cycle assessment (LCA). Unlike the first two, LCA offers a holistic view of emissions throughout the entire transportation system, facilitating precise reduction strategies. This study examines LCA research on transport carbon emissions, revealing scope, impact factors, and policy assessments in 243 selected articles. The primary focus is on road transport and vehicles, with fuel well-to-wheel and vehicle LCAs comprising 32.9% of analyses. While emerging technologies like electric vehicles show direct emission advantages, a life cycle perspective is crucial for accurate assessment. Policy evaluations centers on banning fossil fuel vehicle and promoting zero-emission vehicles. Coordinated policies are essential, as isolated ones may not achieve emission reduction goals, and comprehensive policies must balance stakeholder interests. Future carbon reduction LCA should considering technological innovations, mode optimization, and regional disparities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 107618"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524002051","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The transportation sector significantly contributes to carbon emissions, prompting a surge in research on emission reduction. Carbon estimation methods include bottom-up, top-down, and life cycle assessment (LCA). Unlike the first two, LCA offers a holistic view of emissions throughout the entire transportation system, facilitating precise reduction strategies. This study examines LCA research on transport carbon emissions, revealing scope, impact factors, and policy assessments in 243 selected articles. The primary focus is on road transport and vehicles, with fuel well-to-wheel and vehicle LCAs comprising 32.9% of analyses. While emerging technologies like electric vehicles show direct emission advantages, a life cycle perspective is crucial for accurate assessment. Policy evaluations centers on banning fossil fuel vehicle and promoting zero-emission vehicles. Coordinated policies are essential, as isolated ones may not achieve emission reduction goals, and comprehensive policies must balance stakeholder interests. Future carbon reduction LCA should considering technological innovations, mode optimization, and regional disparities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运输系统碳排放生命周期评估系统回顾
交通部门是碳排放的主要来源,这促使减排研究激增。碳估算方法包括自下而上、自上而下和生命周期评估(LCA)。与前两种方法不同的是,生命周期评估能全面了解整个运输系统的排放情况,有助于制定精确的减排策略。本研究考察了有关运输碳排放的生命周期评估研究,揭示了所选 243 篇文章的范围、影响因素和政策评估。研究的主要重点是公路运输和车辆,其中从燃料井到车轮和车辆的生命周期分析占 32.9%。虽然电动汽车等新兴技术显示出直接排放优势,但生命周期视角对于准确评估至关重要。政策评估的重点是禁止化石燃料汽车和推广零排放汽车。协调的政策至关重要,因为孤立的政策可能无法实现减排目标,全面的政策必须平衡利益相关者的利益。未来的碳减排生命周期评估应考虑技术创新、模式优化和地区差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
期刊最新文献
When differentiated carbon tax policy meets LBD of renewable energy and electrification of energy end-use: Policy implications of sectoral differentiation of carbon productivity and carbon emission Climate policy and carbon leakage: Evidence from the low-carbon city pilot program in China Reducing fertilizer and pesticide application through mandatory agri-environmental regulation: Insights from “Two Zero” policy in China Unveiling the heterogeneity of environmental impacts of China's coal washing plants by a configuration-specific life cycle assessment Moving in the landscape: Omnidirectional connectivity dynamics in China from 1985 to 2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1