Machine learning for subsurface geological feature identification from seismic data: Methods, datasets, challenges, and opportunities

IF 10.8 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Earth-Science Reviews Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104887
Lei Lin , Zhi Zhong , Chenglong Li , Andrew Gorman , Hao Wei , Yanbin Kuang , Shiqi Wen , Zhongxian Cai , Fang Hao
{"title":"Machine learning for subsurface geological feature identification from seismic data: Methods, datasets, challenges, and opportunities","authors":"Lei Lin ,&nbsp;Zhi Zhong ,&nbsp;Chenglong Li ,&nbsp;Andrew Gorman ,&nbsp;Hao Wei ,&nbsp;Yanbin Kuang ,&nbsp;Shiqi Wen ,&nbsp;Zhongxian Cai ,&nbsp;Fang Hao","doi":"10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Identification of geological features from seismic data such as faults, salt bodies, and channels, is essential for studies of the shallow Earth, natural disaster forecasting and evaluation, carbon capture and storage, hydrogen storage, geothermal energy development, and traditional resource exploration. However, manual seismic interpretation is distinctly subjective and labor-intensive. With the advent and rise of 3D surveys, the size of seismic data has increased dramatically, making purely manual interpretation impractical. Since 1989, a large number of machine learning-based methods for identifying geological features have been proposed to address these challenges. To date, these methods have not been reasonably synthesized. Motivated by a progressive increase in applications, this review presents an overview of advances in the utilization of machine learning to identify geological features from seismic data. First, we classify these methods from five different perspectives. Second, we provide a comprehensive overview of 241 publications related to seismic geological feature identification and offer a detailed analysis of the development of these methods categorized by geological feature type. Third, 20 field and 12 synthetic seismic datasets, which are publicly available and relevant to the identification of faults, salt bodies, channels, caves, and horizons, are cataloged. Fourth, we discuss the issue of false positive identification caused by the limited geological features in the training dataset. To address the problems of false positives and insufficient labeled training datasets, we propose a simulation framework for generating 3D synthetic seismic data and corresponding geological labels that include a rich variety of geological features. To the best of our knowledge, this is the synthetic seismic dataset that contains the richest geological features. Finally, we discuss in depth the current challenges and future opportunities to inspire further relevant research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11483,"journal":{"name":"Earth-Science Reviews","volume":"257 ","pages":"Article 104887"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth-Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825224002149","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Identification of geological features from seismic data such as faults, salt bodies, and channels, is essential for studies of the shallow Earth, natural disaster forecasting and evaluation, carbon capture and storage, hydrogen storage, geothermal energy development, and traditional resource exploration. However, manual seismic interpretation is distinctly subjective and labor-intensive. With the advent and rise of 3D surveys, the size of seismic data has increased dramatically, making purely manual interpretation impractical. Since 1989, a large number of machine learning-based methods for identifying geological features have been proposed to address these challenges. To date, these methods have not been reasonably synthesized. Motivated by a progressive increase in applications, this review presents an overview of advances in the utilization of machine learning to identify geological features from seismic data. First, we classify these methods from five different perspectives. Second, we provide a comprehensive overview of 241 publications related to seismic geological feature identification and offer a detailed analysis of the development of these methods categorized by geological feature type. Third, 20 field and 12 synthetic seismic datasets, which are publicly available and relevant to the identification of faults, salt bodies, channels, caves, and horizons, are cataloged. Fourth, we discuss the issue of false positive identification caused by the limited geological features in the training dataset. To address the problems of false positives and insufficient labeled training datasets, we propose a simulation framework for generating 3D synthetic seismic data and corresponding geological labels that include a rich variety of geological features. To the best of our knowledge, this is the synthetic seismic dataset that contains the richest geological features. Finally, we discuss in depth the current challenges and future opportunities to inspire further relevant research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从地震数据中识别地下地质特征的机器学习:方法、数据集、挑战和机遇
从地震数据中识别断层、盐体和通道等地质特征,对于浅层地球研究、自然灾害预报和评估、碳捕获和储存、氢储存、地热能源开发以及传统资源勘探至关重要。然而,人工地震解释具有明显的主观性和劳动密集性。随着三维勘探的出现和兴起,地震数据的规模急剧扩大,纯粹的人工解释变得不切实际。自 1989 年以来,为应对这些挑战,人们提出了大量基于机器学习的地质特征识别方法。迄今为止,这些方法尚未得到合理的综合。在应用逐渐增多的推动下,本综述概述了利用机器学习从地震数据中识别地质特征的进展。首先,我们从五个不同的角度对这些方法进行分类。其次,我们全面概述了与地震地质特征识别相关的 241 篇出版物,并按地质特征类型对这些方法的发展进行了详细分析。第三,我们对 20 个野外地震数据集和 12 个合成地震数据集进行了编目,这些数据集均可公开获取,且与断层、盐体、通道、洞穴和地层的识别相关。第四,我们讨论了由于训练数据集中的地质特征有限而导致的假阳性识别问题。为了解决假阳性和标注训练数据集不足的问题,我们提出了一个模拟框架,用于生成三维合成地震数据和相应的地质标注,其中包括丰富多样的地质特征。据我们所知,这是包含最丰富地质特征的合成地震数据集。最后,我们深入讨论了当前的挑战和未来的机遇,以启发进一步的相关研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Earth-Science Reviews
Earth-Science Reviews 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
21.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
294
审稿时长
15.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Covering a much wider field than the usual specialist journals, Earth Science Reviews publishes review articles dealing with all aspects of Earth Sciences, and is an important vehicle for allowing readers to see their particular interest related to the Earth Sciences as a whole.
期刊最新文献
Metallogeny of Late Paleozoic lode gold mineralization of western Tien Shan: From orogenic shortening to intracontinental strike-slip shearing Precambrian tectonic evolution of the Qaidam block, northern Tibet: Implications for the assembly and breakup of Proterozoic supercontinents Fate of ‘forever chemicals’ in the global cryosphere Incorporating cross-scale insights into colloid-facilitated radionuclide transport in fractured rocks: A critical review Biostabilization: Parameterizing the interactions between microorganisms and siliciclastic marine sediments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1