{"title":"68Ga‐DOTATATE PET/CT: How is it reliable in imaging of cases having clinical suspicion of insulinomas?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This retrospective study evaluates the value of <sup>68</sup>Ga‐DOTATATE PET/CT in the diagnosis and localization of insulinomas, whether sporadic, malignant or MEN‐1 associated insulinoma.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The study included 43 patients, having clinical (symptomatic hypoglycemia) and/or laboratory suspicion of having insulinoma (72 h fasting test with serum insulin ≥18 pmol/L), with available pre-operative <sup>68</sup>Ga‐DOTATATE PET/CT and CE-CT, and diagnosed with insulinoma confirmed by post-operative histopathology. Preoperative imaging was retrospectively analyzed by two radiologists who were blinded to the final diagnosis and to the results of other imaging modalities. Histopathology of specimen was considered the reference standard, and head‐to‐head comparison of preoperative CE-CT and PET imaging findings. Findings were classified as true positive (TP), true negative (TN), false positive (FP), and false negative (FN) for each modality. Based on these results, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of CE-CT, and <sup>68</sup>Ga‐DOTATATE PET/CT for the detection of insulinoma were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>43 patients (N = 43 patients, L = 56 lesions), out of these, 37 patients had benign sporadic insulinoma (N = 37, L = 42), only 3 patients had malignant sporadic insulinoma (N = 2, L = 9), and 3 patients had MEN‐1 syndrome associated insulinoma (N = 3, L = 5). There was no significant statistical difference in sensitivity (P = 0.3058) and PPV (P = 0.5533) for insulinoma localization in the overall cohort with <sup>68</sup>Ga‐DOTATATE PET/CT (87.5 %, 90.74 %) compared to CE-CT (80.36 %, 93.75 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p><sup>68</sup>Ga‐DOTATATE PET/CT is a non-invasive imaging modality that can identify most insulinomas. Still, it offers limited additional information when the tumor is localized by other anatomic imaging studies, so should be used as an adjunct when imaging studies fail to localize the tumor in insulinoma patients, especially when minimally invasive surgical is intended.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X24003851","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
This retrospective study evaluates the value of 68Ga‐DOTATATE PET/CT in the diagnosis and localization of insulinomas, whether sporadic, malignant or MEN‐1 associated insulinoma.
Method
The study included 43 patients, having clinical (symptomatic hypoglycemia) and/or laboratory suspicion of having insulinoma (72 h fasting test with serum insulin ≥18 pmol/L), with available pre-operative 68Ga‐DOTATATE PET/CT and CE-CT, and diagnosed with insulinoma confirmed by post-operative histopathology. Preoperative imaging was retrospectively analyzed by two radiologists who were blinded to the final diagnosis and to the results of other imaging modalities. Histopathology of specimen was considered the reference standard, and head‐to‐head comparison of preoperative CE-CT and PET imaging findings. Findings were classified as true positive (TP), true negative (TN), false positive (FP), and false negative (FN) for each modality. Based on these results, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of CE-CT, and 68Ga‐DOTATATE PET/CT for the detection of insulinoma were calculated.
Results
43 patients (N = 43 patients, L = 56 lesions), out of these, 37 patients had benign sporadic insulinoma (N = 37, L = 42), only 3 patients had malignant sporadic insulinoma (N = 2, L = 9), and 3 patients had MEN‐1 syndrome associated insulinoma (N = 3, L = 5). There was no significant statistical difference in sensitivity (P = 0.3058) and PPV (P = 0.5533) for insulinoma localization in the overall cohort with 68Ga‐DOTATATE PET/CT (87.5 %, 90.74 %) compared to CE-CT (80.36 %, 93.75 %).
Conclusion
68Ga‐DOTATATE PET/CT is a non-invasive imaging modality that can identify most insulinomas. Still, it offers limited additional information when the tumor is localized by other anatomic imaging studies, so should be used as an adjunct when imaging studies fail to localize the tumor in insulinoma patients, especially when minimally invasive surgical is intended.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field.
Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.