Ryan S. Pollard;David S. Hollinger;Iván E. Nail-Ulloa;Michael E. Zabala
{"title":"A Kinematically Informed Approach to Near-Future Joint Angle Estimation at the Ankle","authors":"Ryan S. Pollard;David S. Hollinger;Iván E. Nail-Ulloa;Michael E. Zabala","doi":"10.1109/TMRB.2024.3408892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Elevated runtimes of machine learning algorithms and neural networks make their inclusion in near-future joint angle estimation difficult. The purpose of this study was to develop simple, analytical models that prioritize historical joint kinematics when estimating near-future joint angles. Five kinematically-informed and extrapolation-based methods were developed for joint angle estimation at three near-future estimation horizons: \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$t_{pred} = 50$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n ms, 75 ms, and 100 ms. The estimation error and required runtimes of each prediction algorithm were evaluated on the sagittal-plane ankle angles of 24 individual subjects who performed three level-ground walking trials. Results showed that the kinematically-informed models had significantly faster estimation runtimes than Random Forest (RF) machine learning models trained and tested on identical datasets (kinematic models: \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$t_{run}\\lt 0.62$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n ms, RF models: \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$t_{run}\\gt 8.19$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n ms for all estimation horizons). The RF models exhibited significantly lower prediction errors than the kinematic models for estimation horizons of \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$t_{pred} = 75$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n ms and 100 ms, but no significance was found between the top-performing kinematic model and RF models for a \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$t_{pred} = 50$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n ms. These results indicate that a kinematically-informed approach to joint angle estimation can serve as a simple alternative to complex machine learning models for very near-future applications (\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$t_{pred} \\leq 50$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n ms) while serving as a comparison baseline for more distant estimation horizons (\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$t_{pred} \\geq 75$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n ms).","PeriodicalId":73318,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics","volume":"6 3","pages":"1125-1134"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10547217/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Elevated runtimes of machine learning algorithms and neural networks make their inclusion in near-future joint angle estimation difficult. The purpose of this study was to develop simple, analytical models that prioritize historical joint kinematics when estimating near-future joint angles. Five kinematically-informed and extrapolation-based methods were developed for joint angle estimation at three near-future estimation horizons:
$t_{pred} = 50$
ms, 75 ms, and 100 ms. The estimation error and required runtimes of each prediction algorithm were evaluated on the sagittal-plane ankle angles of 24 individual subjects who performed three level-ground walking trials. Results showed that the kinematically-informed models had significantly faster estimation runtimes than Random Forest (RF) machine learning models trained and tested on identical datasets (kinematic models:
$t_{run}\lt 0.62$
ms, RF models:
$t_{run}\gt 8.19$
ms for all estimation horizons). The RF models exhibited significantly lower prediction errors than the kinematic models for estimation horizons of
$t_{pred} = 75$
ms and 100 ms, but no significance was found between the top-performing kinematic model and RF models for a
$t_{pred} = 50$
ms. These results indicate that a kinematically-informed approach to joint angle estimation can serve as a simple alternative to complex machine learning models for very near-future applications (
$t_{pred} \leq 50$
ms) while serving as a comparison baseline for more distant estimation horizons (
$t_{pred} \geq 75$
ms).