A Kinematically Informed Approach to Near-Future Joint Angle Estimation at the Ankle

IF 3.4 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1109/TMRB.2024.3408892
Ryan S. Pollard;David S. Hollinger;Iván E. Nail-Ulloa;Michael E. Zabala
{"title":"A Kinematically Informed Approach to Near-Future Joint Angle Estimation at the Ankle","authors":"Ryan S. Pollard;David S. Hollinger;Iván E. Nail-Ulloa;Michael E. Zabala","doi":"10.1109/TMRB.2024.3408892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Elevated runtimes of machine learning algorithms and neural networks make their inclusion in near-future joint angle estimation difficult. The purpose of this study was to develop simple, analytical models that prioritize historical joint kinematics when estimating near-future joint angles. Five kinematically-informed and extrapolation-based methods were developed for joint angle estimation at three near-future estimation horizons: \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$t_{pred} = 50$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n ms, 75 ms, and 100 ms. The estimation error and required runtimes of each prediction algorithm were evaluated on the sagittal-plane ankle angles of 24 individual subjects who performed three level-ground walking trials. Results showed that the kinematically-informed models had significantly faster estimation runtimes than Random Forest (RF) machine learning models trained and tested on identical datasets (kinematic models: \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$t_{run}\\lt 0.62$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n ms, RF models: \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$t_{run}\\gt 8.19$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n ms for all estimation horizons). The RF models exhibited significantly lower prediction errors than the kinematic models for estimation horizons of \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$t_{pred} = 75$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n ms and 100 ms, but no significance was found between the top-performing kinematic model and RF models for a \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$t_{pred} = 50$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n ms. These results indicate that a kinematically-informed approach to joint angle estimation can serve as a simple alternative to complex machine learning models for very near-future applications (\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$t_{pred} \\leq 50$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n ms) while serving as a comparison baseline for more distant estimation horizons (\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$t_{pred} \\geq 75$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n ms).","PeriodicalId":73318,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics","volume":"6 3","pages":"1125-1134"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10547217/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Elevated runtimes of machine learning algorithms and neural networks make their inclusion in near-future joint angle estimation difficult. The purpose of this study was to develop simple, analytical models that prioritize historical joint kinematics when estimating near-future joint angles. Five kinematically-informed and extrapolation-based methods were developed for joint angle estimation at three near-future estimation horizons: $t_{pred} = 50$ ms, 75 ms, and 100 ms. The estimation error and required runtimes of each prediction algorithm were evaluated on the sagittal-plane ankle angles of 24 individual subjects who performed three level-ground walking trials. Results showed that the kinematically-informed models had significantly faster estimation runtimes than Random Forest (RF) machine learning models trained and tested on identical datasets (kinematic models: $t_{run}\lt 0.62$ ms, RF models: $t_{run}\gt 8.19$ ms for all estimation horizons). The RF models exhibited significantly lower prediction errors than the kinematic models for estimation horizons of $t_{pred} = 75$ ms and 100 ms, but no significance was found between the top-performing kinematic model and RF models for a $t_{pred} = 50$ ms. These results indicate that a kinematically-informed approach to joint angle estimation can serve as a simple alternative to complex machine learning models for very near-future applications ( $t_{pred} \leq 50$ ms) while serving as a comparison baseline for more distant estimation horizons ( $t_{pred} \geq 75$ ms).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
踝关节近未来关节角度估计的运动学方法
机器学习算法和神经网络的运行时间较长,因此很难将其纳入近未来关节角度估算中。本研究旨在开发简单的分析模型,在估算近未来关节角度时优先考虑历史关节运动学。研究开发了五种以运动学为基础的外推法,用于在三个近未来估计视角下估计关节角度:$t_{pred} = 50$ ms、75 ms 和 100 ms。对 24 名受试者进行了三次平地行走试验,评估了每种预测算法的估计误差和所需运行时间。结果表明,在相同的数据集上训练和测试的运动学模型的估计运行时间明显快于随机森林(RF)机器学习模型(运动学模型:$t_{run}\lt 0.62$ms,RF模型:$t_{run}\gt 8.19$ms,适用于所有估计范围)。射频模型在 $t_{pred} = 75$ ms 和 $t_{pred} = 100 ms 时的预测误差明显低于运动学模型,但在 $t_{pred} = 50$ ms 时,表现最好的运动学模型与射频模型之间没有显著差异。这些结果表明,在非常接近未来的应用中($t_{pred} \leq 50$ms),以运动学为基础的关节角度估计方法可以作为复杂机器学习模型的简单替代方法,同时也可以作为更远估计范围($t_{pred} \geq 75$ms)的比较基线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics Society Information Guest Editorial Special section on the Hamlyn Symposium 2023—Immersive Tech: The Future of Medicine IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics Publication Information IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics Information for Authors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1