Depressive Symptom Change Patterns during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Their Impact on Psychiatric Treatment Seeking: A 24-Month Observational Study of the Adult Population

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Depression and Anxiety Pub Date : 2024-08-04 DOI:10.1155/2024/1272738
Omid V. Ebrahimi, René Freichel, Sverre Urnes Johnson, Asle Hoffart, Ole André Solbakken, Daniel J. Bauer
{"title":"Depressive Symptom Change Patterns during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Their Impact on Psychiatric Treatment Seeking: A 24-Month Observational Study of the Adult Population","authors":"Omid V. Ebrahimi,&nbsp;René Freichel,&nbsp;Sverre Urnes Johnson,&nbsp;Asle Hoffart,&nbsp;Ole André Solbakken,&nbsp;Daniel J. Bauer","doi":"10.1155/2024/1272738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Despite the presence of individual differences in the depressive symptom change in adults during the COVID-19 pandemic, most studies have investigated population-level changes in depression during the first year of the pandemic. This longitudinal repeated-measurement study obtained 39,259 observations from 4,361 adults assessed nine times over a 24-month period in Norway (March 2020 to March 2022). Using a Latent Change Score Mixture Model to investigate differential change patterns in depressive symptoms, five profiles were identified. Most adults revealed a consistently resilient (42.52%) or predominantly resilient pattern differentiated by an initial shock in symptomatology (13.17%). Another group exhibited consistently high depressive adversities (8.5%). One group showed mild deterioration with small increases in depressive symptomatology compared to onset levels (29.04%), and a second strong deterioration group exhibited clinically severe levels of gained symptoms over time (6.77%). Both deteriorating depressive symptom change patterns predicted the presence of a psychiatric diagnosis and treatment seeking at the end of the study period. Together, the absence of a preexisting psychiatric diagnosis at the onset of the pandemic and severe symptom increases during, combined with reports of psychiatric treatment seeking and diagnosis at the end of the study period, indicated that the strongly deteriorating subgroup represents an additional and newly emerged group of adults struggling with depressive problems. Factors related to general adverse change (lower education levels, lone residence), initial shocks prior to recovery (frequent information seeking, financial and occupational concerns), and resilience and recovery (older age, being in a relationship, physical activity) were identified. Binge drinking and belonging to an ethnic minority were influential predictors of the strongly deteriorating group. All major change patterns in depressive symptoms occurred during the first 3 months of the pandemic, suggesting this period represents a window of sensitivity for the development of long-lasting depressive states versus patterns of recovery and resilience. These findings call for increased vigilance of psychiatric symptoms during the initial phases of infectious disease outbreaks and highlight a specific target period for the implementation of preventive measures.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55179,"journal":{"name":"Depression and Anxiety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/1272738","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression and Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/1272738","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the presence of individual differences in the depressive symptom change in adults during the COVID-19 pandemic, most studies have investigated population-level changes in depression during the first year of the pandemic. This longitudinal repeated-measurement study obtained 39,259 observations from 4,361 adults assessed nine times over a 24-month period in Norway (March 2020 to March 2022). Using a Latent Change Score Mixture Model to investigate differential change patterns in depressive symptoms, five profiles were identified. Most adults revealed a consistently resilient (42.52%) or predominantly resilient pattern differentiated by an initial shock in symptomatology (13.17%). Another group exhibited consistently high depressive adversities (8.5%). One group showed mild deterioration with small increases in depressive symptomatology compared to onset levels (29.04%), and a second strong deterioration group exhibited clinically severe levels of gained symptoms over time (6.77%). Both deteriorating depressive symptom change patterns predicted the presence of a psychiatric diagnosis and treatment seeking at the end of the study period. Together, the absence of a preexisting psychiatric diagnosis at the onset of the pandemic and severe symptom increases during, combined with reports of psychiatric treatment seeking and diagnosis at the end of the study period, indicated that the strongly deteriorating subgroup represents an additional and newly emerged group of adults struggling with depressive problems. Factors related to general adverse change (lower education levels, lone residence), initial shocks prior to recovery (frequent information seeking, financial and occupational concerns), and resilience and recovery (older age, being in a relationship, physical activity) were identified. Binge drinking and belonging to an ethnic minority were influential predictors of the strongly deteriorating group. All major change patterns in depressive symptoms occurred during the first 3 months of the pandemic, suggesting this period represents a window of sensitivity for the development of long-lasting depressive states versus patterns of recovery and resilience. These findings call for increased vigilance of psychiatric symptoms during the initial phases of infectious disease outbreaks and highlight a specific target period for the implementation of preventive measures.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 大流行期间抑郁症状的变化模式及其对寻求精神治疗的影响:为期 24 个月的成人观察研究
尽管在COVID-19大流行期间成人抑郁症状的变化存在个体差异,但大多数研究都是调查大流行第一年期间人群抑郁症的变化。这项纵向重复测量研究从挪威的4361名成年人中获得了39259个观测数据,在24个月内(2020年3月至2022年3月)进行了9次评估。通过使用潜伏变化分数混合模型来研究抑郁症状的不同变化模式,确定了五种特征。大多数成年人表现出持续的恢复能力(42.52%)或主要的恢复能力模式,其区别在于症状的初始冲击(13.17%)。另一组表现出持续的高度抑郁逆境(8.5%)。一组表现为轻度恶化,抑郁症状较起病时略有增加(29.04%),另一组则表现为严重恶化,随着时间的推移,症状逐渐加重(6.77%)。这两种抑郁症状的恶化变化模式都预示着研究期结束时会出现精神病诊断和寻求治疗的情况。大流行开始时没有精神病诊断,大流行期间症状严重加重,加上研究期结束时有精神病治疗和诊断的报告,这些因素加在一起表明,严重恶化的亚组代表了与抑郁问题作斗争的新出现的成人群体。研究发现了与总体不利变化(教育水平较低、独居)、康复前的初始冲击(频繁寻求信息、经济和职业问题)以及复原力和康复(年龄较大、有伴侣、体育锻炼)相关的因素。酗酒和少数族裔是预测严重恶化组的重要因素。抑郁症状的所有主要变化模式都发生在大流行的头三个月,这表明这一时期是发展长期抑郁状态与恢复和复原模式的敏感窗口期。这些研究结果呼吁人们在传染病爆发的初期阶段提高对精神症状的警惕,并强调了实施预防措施的特定目标期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Depression and Anxiety
Depression and Anxiety 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
81
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Depression and Anxiety is a scientific journal that focuses on the study of mood and anxiety disorders, as well as related phenomena in humans. The journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality research and review articles that contribute to the understanding and treatment of these conditions. The journal places a particular emphasis on articles that contribute to the clinical evaluation and care of individuals affected by mood and anxiety disorders. It prioritizes the publication of treatment-related research and review papers, as well as those that present novel findings that can directly impact clinical practice. The journal's goal is to advance the field by disseminating knowledge that can lead to better diagnosis, treatment, and management of these disorders, ultimately improving the quality of life for those who suffer from them.
期刊最新文献
The Bridge Symptoms of Work–Family Conflict, Sleep Disorder, and Job Burnout: A Network Analysis Resolving Heterogeneity in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Using Individualized Structural Covariance Network Analysis Relationship Between BMI, Self-Rated Depression, and Food Addiction—A Cross-Sectional Study of Adults in Postpandemic Poland Precariousness Represents an Independent Risk Factor for Depression in Children With Sickle Cell Disease Exploring the Association Between Residual Mood Symptoms and Self-Reported Side Effects in the Euthymic Phase of Bipolar Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Network Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1