Soil carbon stocks in sugarcane cultivation: An evidence synthesis associated with land use and management practices

IF 5.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 AGRONOMY Global Change Biology Bioenergy Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1111/gcbb.13188
Carlos Roberto Pinheiro Junior, João Luís Nunes Carvalho, Lucas Pecci Canisares, Carlos Eduardo Pellegrino Cerri, Maurício Roberto Cherubin
{"title":"Soil carbon stocks in sugarcane cultivation: An evidence synthesis associated with land use and management practices","authors":"Carlos Roberto Pinheiro Junior,&nbsp;João Luís Nunes Carvalho,&nbsp;Lucas Pecci Canisares,&nbsp;Carlos Eduardo Pellegrino Cerri,&nbsp;Maurício Roberto Cherubin","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.13188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biofuels are essential to ensure the energy transition and mitigating of climate change. However, understanding the impact of land use change (LUC) and management practices on soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks is fundamental to ensuring well-founded policymaking and assessing the sector's carbon footprint. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis (511 pairwise observations) to obtain Brazil's SOC stock change factors (SOC<sub>scf</sub>) for LUC and management practices in sugarcane fields. Our results showed that converting native vegetation to sugarcane reduced the SOC stock in all assessed periods. The conversion from annual crops to sugarcane showed a reduction in SOC stock in the first 10 years but with a recovery over time. The conversion of pasture to sugarcane reduced the SOC stock only in the 10–20-year period and had a neutral effect in other periods evaluated. However, our dataset showed high variability in SOC<sub>scf</sub>, with many observations indicating an increase in SOC stock, which is related to degraded pastures. We observed that the SOC accumulation rate for each ton of sugarcane straw was affected by the interaction between soil texture and precipitation. Regarding straw management, a low removal rate (&lt; 34%) did not affect the SOC stock, while moderate (34%–66%) and high (&gt; 66%) removal resulted in losses of 5.0% (SOC<sub>scf</sub> 0.950) and 9.9% (SOC<sub>scf</sub> 0.901), respectively. Our results also showed that reduced tillage and vinasse application increased SOC stocks by 24.0% (SOC<sub>scf</sub> 1.24) and 10.0% (SOC<sub>scf</sub> 1.10) respectively, proving to be good strategies to support C sequestration in sugarcane fields. Finally, we highlight that our results can contribute to the improvement of public policies and also be used in future life cycle assessment (LCA) and modeling studies, as they provide robust data to establishing regional SOC<sub>scf</sub> induced by LUC and management practices, enhancing the reliability of the C footprint assessment of biofuel production.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"16 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.13188","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.13188","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biofuels are essential to ensure the energy transition and mitigating of climate change. However, understanding the impact of land use change (LUC) and management practices on soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks is fundamental to ensuring well-founded policymaking and assessing the sector's carbon footprint. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis (511 pairwise observations) to obtain Brazil's SOC stock change factors (SOCscf) for LUC and management practices in sugarcane fields. Our results showed that converting native vegetation to sugarcane reduced the SOC stock in all assessed periods. The conversion from annual crops to sugarcane showed a reduction in SOC stock in the first 10 years but with a recovery over time. The conversion of pasture to sugarcane reduced the SOC stock only in the 10–20-year period and had a neutral effect in other periods evaluated. However, our dataset showed high variability in SOCscf, with many observations indicating an increase in SOC stock, which is related to degraded pastures. We observed that the SOC accumulation rate for each ton of sugarcane straw was affected by the interaction between soil texture and precipitation. Regarding straw management, a low removal rate (< 34%) did not affect the SOC stock, while moderate (34%–66%) and high (> 66%) removal resulted in losses of 5.0% (SOCscf 0.950) and 9.9% (SOCscf 0.901), respectively. Our results also showed that reduced tillage and vinasse application increased SOC stocks by 24.0% (SOCscf 1.24) and 10.0% (SOCscf 1.10) respectively, proving to be good strategies to support C sequestration in sugarcane fields. Finally, we highlight that our results can contribute to the improvement of public policies and also be used in future life cycle assessment (LCA) and modeling studies, as they provide robust data to establishing regional SOCscf induced by LUC and management practices, enhancing the reliability of the C footprint assessment of biofuel production.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甘蔗种植中的土壤碳储量:与土地利用和管理方法相关的证据综述
生物燃料对于确保能源转型和减缓气候变化至关重要。然而,了解土地利用变化(LUC)和管理实践对土壤有机碳(SOC)储量的影响对于确保制定有理有据的政策和评估该行业的碳足迹至关重要。在此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析(511 对观测数据),以获得巴西甘蔗田土地利用变化和管理措施的 SOC 储量变化因子(SOCscf)。我们的结果表明,在所有评估时段,将本地植被转化为甘蔗都会减少 SOC 储量。从一年生作物到甘蔗的转换在头 10 年显示出 SOC 储量的减少,但随着时间的推移会逐渐恢复。将牧草改种甘蔗仅在 10-20 年期间减少了 SOC 储量,而在其他评估期间则没有影响。不过,我们的数据集显示 SOCscf 的变化很大,许多观测结果显示 SOC 储量增加,这与退化的牧场有关。我们观察到,每吨甘蔗秸秆的 SOC 积累率受到土壤质地和降水之间相互作用的影响。在秸秆管理方面,低清除率(34%)不影响 SOC 储量,而中清除率(34%-66%)和高清除率(66%)分别导致 5.0% (SOCscf 0.950)和 9.9% (SOCscf 0.901)的损失。我们的研究结果还表明,减少耕作和施用蔗渣可使 SOC 储量分别增加 24.0%(SOCscf 1.24)和 10.0%(SOCscf 1.10),证明是支持甘蔗田固碳的良好策略。最后,我们强调,我们的研究结果有助于改进公共政策,也可用于未来的生命周期评估(LCA)和建模研究,因为它们提供了可靠的数据,可用于确定由土地利用变化和管理实践引起的区域 SOCscf,从而提高生物燃料生产的碳足迹评估的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Change Biology Bioenergy
Global Change Biology Bioenergy AGRONOMY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used. Key areas covered by the journal: Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis). Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues. Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems. Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy. Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.
期刊最新文献
Seasonal Harvesting Impact on Biomass Fuel Properties and Pyrolysis-Derived Bio-Oil Organic Phase Composition Managing Soil Carbon Sequestration: Assessing the Effects of Intermediate Crops, Crop Residue Removal, and Digestate Application on Swedish Arable Land A New Enzyme for Biodiesel Production and Food Applications: Lipase of Bacillus megaterium F25 Isolated From an Aquatic Insect Rhantus suturalis Advanced Biofuel Value Chains Sourced by New Cropping Systems With Low iLUC Risk Displacement Factors for Aerosol Emissions From Alternative Forest Biomass Use
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1