{"title":"Centralization in Attester-Proposer Separation","authors":"Mallesh Pai, Max Resnick","doi":"arxiv-2408.03116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We show that Execution Tickets and Execution Auctions dramatically increase\ncentralization in the market for block proposals, even without multi-block MEV\nconcerns. Previous analyses have insufficiently or incorrectly modeled the\ninteraction between ahead-of-time auctions and just-in-time (JIT) auctions. We\nstudy a model where bidders compete in an execution auction ahead of time, and\nthen the winner holds a JIT auction to resell the proposal rights when the slot\narrives. During the execution auction, bidders only know the distribution of\ntheir valuations. Bidders then draw values from their distributions and compete\nin the JIT auction. We show that a bidder who wins the execution auction is\nsubstantially advantaged in the JIT auction since they can set a reserve price\nhigher than their own realized value for the slot to increase their revenue. As\na result, there is a strong centralizing force in the execution auction, which\nallows the ex-ante strongest bidder to win the execution auction every time,\nand similarly gives them the strongest incentive to buy up all the tickets.\nSimilar results trivially apply if the resale market is imperfect, since that\nonly reinforces the advantages of the ex-ante strong buyer. To reiterate, these\nresults do not require the bidders to employ multi-block MEV strategies,\nalthough if they did, it would likely amplify the centralizing effects.","PeriodicalId":501188,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.03116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We show that Execution Tickets and Execution Auctions dramatically increase
centralization in the market for block proposals, even without multi-block MEV
concerns. Previous analyses have insufficiently or incorrectly modeled the
interaction between ahead-of-time auctions and just-in-time (JIT) auctions. We
study a model where bidders compete in an execution auction ahead of time, and
then the winner holds a JIT auction to resell the proposal rights when the slot
arrives. During the execution auction, bidders only know the distribution of
their valuations. Bidders then draw values from their distributions and compete
in the JIT auction. We show that a bidder who wins the execution auction is
substantially advantaged in the JIT auction since they can set a reserve price
higher than their own realized value for the slot to increase their revenue. As
a result, there is a strong centralizing force in the execution auction, which
allows the ex-ante strongest bidder to win the execution auction every time,
and similarly gives them the strongest incentive to buy up all the tickets.
Similar results trivially apply if the resale market is imperfect, since that
only reinforces the advantages of the ex-ante strong buyer. To reiterate, these
results do not require the bidders to employ multi-block MEV strategies,
although if they did, it would likely amplify the centralizing effects.