Centralization in Attester-Proposer Separation

Mallesh Pai, Max Resnick
{"title":"Centralization in Attester-Proposer Separation","authors":"Mallesh Pai, Max Resnick","doi":"arxiv-2408.03116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We show that Execution Tickets and Execution Auctions dramatically increase\ncentralization in the market for block proposals, even without multi-block MEV\nconcerns. Previous analyses have insufficiently or incorrectly modeled the\ninteraction between ahead-of-time auctions and just-in-time (JIT) auctions. We\nstudy a model where bidders compete in an execution auction ahead of time, and\nthen the winner holds a JIT auction to resell the proposal rights when the slot\narrives. During the execution auction, bidders only know the distribution of\ntheir valuations. Bidders then draw values from their distributions and compete\nin the JIT auction. We show that a bidder who wins the execution auction is\nsubstantially advantaged in the JIT auction since they can set a reserve price\nhigher than their own realized value for the slot to increase their revenue. As\na result, there is a strong centralizing force in the execution auction, which\nallows the ex-ante strongest bidder to win the execution auction every time,\nand similarly gives them the strongest incentive to buy up all the tickets.\nSimilar results trivially apply if the resale market is imperfect, since that\nonly reinforces the advantages of the ex-ante strong buyer. To reiterate, these\nresults do not require the bidders to employ multi-block MEV strategies,\nalthough if they did, it would likely amplify the centralizing effects.","PeriodicalId":501188,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.03116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We show that Execution Tickets and Execution Auctions dramatically increase centralization in the market for block proposals, even without multi-block MEV concerns. Previous analyses have insufficiently or incorrectly modeled the interaction between ahead-of-time auctions and just-in-time (JIT) auctions. We study a model where bidders compete in an execution auction ahead of time, and then the winner holds a JIT auction to resell the proposal rights when the slot arrives. During the execution auction, bidders only know the distribution of their valuations. Bidders then draw values from their distributions and compete in the JIT auction. We show that a bidder who wins the execution auction is substantially advantaged in the JIT auction since they can set a reserve price higher than their own realized value for the slot to increase their revenue. As a result, there is a strong centralizing force in the execution auction, which allows the ex-ante strongest bidder to win the execution auction every time, and similarly gives them the strongest incentive to buy up all the tickets. Similar results trivially apply if the resale market is imperfect, since that only reinforces the advantages of the ex-ante strong buyer. To reiterate, these results do not require the bidders to employ multi-block MEV strategies, although if they did, it would likely amplify the centralizing effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
听证人-提案人分离中的集中化
我们的研究表明,即使没有多区块 MEVconcerns,"执行票 "和 "执行拍卖 "也能显著提高区块提案市场的集中度。以前的分析没有充分或错误地模拟超前拍卖和及时拍卖(JIT)之间的互动。在 Westudy 模型中,投标人先在执行拍卖中竞争,然后胜出者再举行 JIT 拍卖,在时段到达时转售提案权。在执行拍卖过程中,投标人只知道他们的估值分布。然后,投标人从他们的分布中抽取价值,并在 JIT 拍卖中竞争。我们的研究表明,在执行拍卖中获胜的投标人在 JIT 拍卖中占有很大优势,因为他们可以设定一个高于自己对该时段的实现价值的底价,以增加自己的收益。因此,在执行拍卖中存在着强大的集中化力量,这使得事前最强的出价人每次都能在执行拍卖中获胜,同样也使他们有最强的动机买下所有门票。如果转售市场不完善,类似的结果也会出现,因为这只会加强事前最强买家的优势。重申一下,这些结果并不要求投标人采用多区块 MEV 策略,尽管如果他们这样做,很可能会放大集中效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Expert Classification Aggregation Approximately Optimal Auctions With a Strong Bidder Beyond Rationality: Unveiling the Role of Animal Spirits and Inflation Extrapolation in Central Bank Communication of the US The Extreme Points of Fusions A Statistical Equilibrium Approach to Adam Smith's Labor Theory of Value
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1