Examining the Influence of Generalized Trust on Life Satisfaction Across Different Education Levels and Socioeconomic Conditions Using the Bayesian Mindsponge Framework

IF 2 4区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Sage Open Pub Date : 2024-08-10 DOI:10.1177/21582440241267373
Tam-Tri Le, Minh-Hoang Nguyen, Ruining Jin, Viet-Phuong La, Hong-Son Nguyen, Quan-Hoang Vuong
{"title":"Examining the Influence of Generalized Trust on Life Satisfaction Across Different Education Levels and Socioeconomic Conditions Using the Bayesian Mindsponge Framework","authors":"Tam-Tri Le, Minh-Hoang Nguyen, Ruining Jin, Viet-Phuong La, Hong-Son Nguyen, Quan-Hoang Vuong","doi":"10.1177/21582440241267373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extant literature suggests a positive correlation between social trust (also called generalized trust) and life satisfaction. However, the psychological pathways underlying this relationship can be complex. Using the Bayesian Mindsponge Framework (BMF), we examined the influence of social trust in a high-violence environment. Employing Bayesian analysis on a sample of 1,237 adults in Cali, Colombia, we found that in a linear relationship, generalized trust is positively associated with life satisfaction. However, in a model including the interactions between trust and education level as well as between trust and socioeconomic status, generalized trust is found to be negatively associated with life satisfaction. In this non-linear relationship, both education level and socioeconomic status have moderating effects against the negative association between generalized trust and life satisfaction. In other words, less educated people living in worse socioeconomic conditions are more likely to have lower life satisfaction when they have higher levels of social trust. In contrast, highly educated people living in better socioeconomic conditions are more likely to have higher life satisfaction when they have higher levels of social trust. Due to the facilitating function of trust in information processing, lowering the rigor of the filtering system in a high-violence social environment will likely put an individual at risk. Based on our findings, we suggest that policymakers should be more meticulous and consider many socioeconomic factors when advocating for increasing social trust. We also recommend that researchers should investigate deeper the complexity of human psychology and the information-processing mechanisms of social trust.","PeriodicalId":48167,"journal":{"name":"Sage Open","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sage Open","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241267373","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extant literature suggests a positive correlation between social trust (also called generalized trust) and life satisfaction. However, the psychological pathways underlying this relationship can be complex. Using the Bayesian Mindsponge Framework (BMF), we examined the influence of social trust in a high-violence environment. Employing Bayesian analysis on a sample of 1,237 adults in Cali, Colombia, we found that in a linear relationship, generalized trust is positively associated with life satisfaction. However, in a model including the interactions between trust and education level as well as between trust and socioeconomic status, generalized trust is found to be negatively associated with life satisfaction. In this non-linear relationship, both education level and socioeconomic status have moderating effects against the negative association between generalized trust and life satisfaction. In other words, less educated people living in worse socioeconomic conditions are more likely to have lower life satisfaction when they have higher levels of social trust. In contrast, highly educated people living in better socioeconomic conditions are more likely to have higher life satisfaction when they have higher levels of social trust. Due to the facilitating function of trust in information processing, lowering the rigor of the filtering system in a high-violence social environment will likely put an individual at risk. Based on our findings, we suggest that policymakers should be more meticulous and consider many socioeconomic factors when advocating for increasing social trust. We also recommend that researchers should investigate deeper the complexity of human psychology and the information-processing mechanisms of social trust.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用贝叶斯明仕亚洲官网框架研究不同教育水平和社会经济条件下普遍信任对生活满意度的影响
现有文献表明,社会信任(也称广义信任)与生活满意度之间存在正相关关系。然而,这种关系背后的心理路径可能很复杂。我们利用贝叶斯心智海绵框架(BMF),研究了社会信任在高暴力环境中的影响。通过对哥伦比亚卡利市 1237 名成年人的样本进行贝叶斯分析,我们发现在线性关系中,广义信任与生活满意度呈正相关。然而,在一个包括信任与教育水平以及信任与社会经济地位之间交互作用的模型中,我们发现普遍信任与生活满意度呈负相关。在这种非线性关系中,教育水平和社会经济地位对普遍信任与生活满意度之间的负相关有调节作用。换句话说,生活在较差社会经济条件下的受教育程度较低的人,当他们的社会信任度较高时,他们的生活满意度更有可能较低。相反,生活在较好社会经济条件下的受过高等教育的人,如果拥有较高的社会信任度,则更有可能获得较高的生活满意度。由于信任在信息处理中的促进功能,在高暴力社会环境中降低过滤系统的严格程度很可能会使个人处于危险之中。基于我们的研究结果,我们建议政策制定者在倡导提高社会信任度时应更加细致,并考虑多种社会经济因素。我们还建议研究人员深入研究人类心理的复杂性和社会信任的信息处理机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sage Open
Sage Open SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
721
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
An exploration of positive leisure activities in Batswana families An Analysis of the Cognitive Demands of Senior High School English as a Foreign Language Textbooks in China Social Inequalities in Loneliness: Disentangling the Contributions of Education, Income, and Occupation What Makes an International Student in the U.S. Have Less Psychological Distress? Development and Validation of the Family Involvement in Graduate School (FIGS) Measure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1