COVID-19 Diagnosis, Oral Anticoagulation, and Stroke Risk in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1007/s40256-024-00671-3
Lanting Yang, Shangbin Tang, Jingchuan Guo, Nico Gabriel, Walid F. Gellad, Utibe R. Essien, Jared W. Magnani, Inmaculada Hernandez
{"title":"COVID-19 Diagnosis, Oral Anticoagulation, and Stroke Risk in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation","authors":"Lanting Yang,&nbsp;Shangbin Tang,&nbsp;Jingchuan Guo,&nbsp;Nico Gabriel,&nbsp;Walid F. Gellad,&nbsp;Utibe R. Essien,&nbsp;Jared W. Magnani,&nbsp;Inmaculada Hernandez","doi":"10.1007/s40256-024-00671-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been associated with an increased risk of stroke. It remains unclear whether the risk of stroke associated with a diagnosis of COVID-19 differed with oral anticoagulation (OAC) use. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between COVID-19 infection, OAC use, and stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective cohort study was conducted in individuals with established AF using data from Optum’s deidentified Clinformatics<sup>®</sup> Data Mart Database. Cox proportional hazard models with time-dependent variables were employed to assess the association between possession of OAC, COVID-19 diagnosis in both inpatient and outpatient setting, and time to ischemic stroke.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 561,758 individuals aged 77 ± 10 were included in the study, with a mean follow up time of 1.3 years. OAC use was associated with a reduced stroke risk [hazard ratio (HR) 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82–0.88]. COVID-19 infection was associated with an increased risk of stroke (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.87–2.38); this increased risk was particularly pronounced for patients diagnosed with an inpatient diagnosis of COVID-19 (HR 3.95, 95% CI 3.33–4.68). There was no significant interaction between OAC use and COVID-19 diagnosis (<i>p</i> value = 0.96). As a result, the relative increase in stroke risk associated with COVID-19 did not differ between patients on OAC (HR 2.12; 95% CI 1.71–2.62) and those not on OAC (HR 2.11; 95% CI 1.83–2.43).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In a nationwide sample of patients with established AF, we found the relative increase in stroke risk associated with COVID-19 was independent of OAC use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":"24 5","pages":"693 - 702"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40256-024-00671-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been associated with an increased risk of stroke. It remains unclear whether the risk of stroke associated with a diagnosis of COVID-19 differed with oral anticoagulation (OAC) use. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between COVID-19 infection, OAC use, and stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in individuals with established AF using data from Optum’s deidentified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database. Cox proportional hazard models with time-dependent variables were employed to assess the association between possession of OAC, COVID-19 diagnosis in both inpatient and outpatient setting, and time to ischemic stroke.

Results

A total of 561,758 individuals aged 77 ± 10 were included in the study, with a mean follow up time of 1.3 years. OAC use was associated with a reduced stroke risk [hazard ratio (HR) 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82–0.88]. COVID-19 infection was associated with an increased risk of stroke (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.87–2.38); this increased risk was particularly pronounced for patients diagnosed with an inpatient diagnosis of COVID-19 (HR 3.95, 95% CI 3.33–4.68). There was no significant interaction between OAC use and COVID-19 diagnosis (p value = 0.96). As a result, the relative increase in stroke risk associated with COVID-19 did not differ between patients on OAC (HR 2.12; 95% CI 1.71–2.62) and those not on OAC (HR 2.11; 95% CI 1.83–2.43).

Conclusion

In a nationwide sample of patients with established AF, we found the relative increase in stroke risk associated with COVID-19 was independent of OAC use.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 心房颤动患者的诊断、口服抗凝药和中风风险。
背景:冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)与中风风险增加有关。目前仍不清楚确诊 COVID-19 与口服抗凝药(OAC)的使用有关的中风风险是否有所不同。本研究旨在评估心房颤动(房颤)患者感染 COVID-19、使用 OAC 与中风之间的关联:方法:利用 Optum 的去标识 Clinformatics® Data Mart 数据库中的数据,对已确诊的房颤患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。采用时间依赖变量的 Cox 比例危险模型来评估拥有 OAC、住院和门诊的 COVID-19 诊断与缺血性中风发生时间之间的关联:研究共纳入 561 758 人,年龄为 77 ± 10 岁,平均随访时间为 1.3 年。使用 OAC 可降低中风风险[危险比 (HR) 0.85,95% 置信区间 (CI) 0.82-0.88]。COVID-19 感染与脑卒中风险增加有关(HR 2.11,95% CI 1.87-2.38);这种风险增加对住院诊断为 COVID-19 的患者尤为明显(HR 3.95,95% CI 3.33-4.68)。使用 OAC 与 COVID-19 诊断之间没有明显的交互作用(P 值 = 0.96)。因此,使用 OAC 的患者(HR 2.12; 95% CI 1.71-2.62)与未使用 OAC 的患者(HR 2.11; 95% CI 1.83-2.43)之间与 COVID-19 相关的卒中风险相对增加并无差异:在全国范围内的已确诊房颤患者样本中,我们发现与 COVID-19 相关的卒中风险相对增加与使用 OAC 无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting rational therapy within the discipline of cardiology, the American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs covers all aspects of the treatment of cardiovascular disorders, particularly the place in therapy of newer and established agents. Via a program of reviews and original clinical research articles, the journal addresses major issues relating to treatment of these disorders, including the pharmacology, efficacy and adverse effects of the major classes of drugs; information on newly developed drugs and drug classes; the therapeutic implications of latest research into the aetiology of cardiovascular disorders; and the practical management of specific clinical situations. The American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs offers a range of additional enhanced features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist patients, caregivers and others in understanding important medical advances. The journal also provides the option to include various other types of enhanced features including slide sets, videos and animations. All enhanced features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. Peer review is conducted using Editorial Manager®, supported by a database of international experts. This database is shared with other Adis journals.
期刊最新文献
Cost Effectiveness of Catheter Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction between Cilostazol and Rosuvastatin in Healthy Participants. Use of Direct Anticoagulants in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Review of the Current Evidence and Emerging Perspectives. Impact of Antibacterials on the Quality of Anticoagulation Control in Patients Initiating Warfarin Therapy. Sacubitril-Valsartan Lowers Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence and Left Atrial Volume Post-catheter Ablation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1