Cristopher Albor, Katherine Eisen, Emma Moore, Monica Geber, Tia-Lynn Ashman, Robert A Raguso, Gerardo Arceo-Gomez
{"title":"Co-flowering richness has variable effects on pollen quantity and quality limitation in four Clarkia species.","authors":"Cristopher Albor, Katherine Eisen, Emma Moore, Monica Geber, Tia-Lynn Ashman, Robert A Raguso, Gerardo Arceo-Gomez","doi":"10.1093/aob/mcae136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Pollination failure occurs from insufficient pollen quantity or quality. However, the relative contributions of pollen quantity vs quality to overall pollen limitation, and how this is affected by the co-flowering context, remain unknown for most plant populations. Here, we studied patterns of pollen deposition and pollen tube formation across populations of four predominately outcrossing species in the genus Clarkia to evaluate how richness of co-flowering congeners affects the contribution of pollen quantity and quality to pollen limitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We partition variation in pollen deposition and pollen tube production across individuals, populations and species to identify the main sources of variation in components of reproductive success. We further quantify the relative contribution of pollen quantity and quality limitation to the reproductive success of the four Clarkia species using piecewise regression analyses. Finally, we evaluate how variation in the number of co-flowering Clarkia species in the community affects the strength of pollen quality and quality limitation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all contexts, pollen deposition and the proportion of pollen tubes produced varied greatly among individuals, populations, and species, and these were not always correlated. For instance, C. xantiana received the smallest pollen loads yet produced the highest proportion of pollen tubes, while C. speciosa exhibited the opposite pattern. Yet, co-flowering richness had variable effects on the strength of pollen quantity and quality limitation among populations. Specifically, breakpoint values, which are an indicator of overall pollen limitation, were two times larger in the four-species community compared with one and two-species communities for two Clarkia species, suggesting that pollen limitation can increase with increasing richness of co-flowering congeners.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results reveal a complex interplay between quantity and quality of pollen limitation and co-flowering context that may have different evolutionary outcomes across species and populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8023,"journal":{"name":"Annals of botany","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcae136","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and aims: Pollination failure occurs from insufficient pollen quantity or quality. However, the relative contributions of pollen quantity vs quality to overall pollen limitation, and how this is affected by the co-flowering context, remain unknown for most plant populations. Here, we studied patterns of pollen deposition and pollen tube formation across populations of four predominately outcrossing species in the genus Clarkia to evaluate how richness of co-flowering congeners affects the contribution of pollen quantity and quality to pollen limitation.
Methods: We partition variation in pollen deposition and pollen tube production across individuals, populations and species to identify the main sources of variation in components of reproductive success. We further quantify the relative contribution of pollen quantity and quality limitation to the reproductive success of the four Clarkia species using piecewise regression analyses. Finally, we evaluate how variation in the number of co-flowering Clarkia species in the community affects the strength of pollen quality and quality limitation.
Results: Across all contexts, pollen deposition and the proportion of pollen tubes produced varied greatly among individuals, populations, and species, and these were not always correlated. For instance, C. xantiana received the smallest pollen loads yet produced the highest proportion of pollen tubes, while C. speciosa exhibited the opposite pattern. Yet, co-flowering richness had variable effects on the strength of pollen quantity and quality limitation among populations. Specifically, breakpoint values, which are an indicator of overall pollen limitation, were two times larger in the four-species community compared with one and two-species communities for two Clarkia species, suggesting that pollen limitation can increase with increasing richness of co-flowering congeners.
Conclusions: Our results reveal a complex interplay between quantity and quality of pollen limitation and co-flowering context that may have different evolutionary outcomes across species and populations.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Botany is an international plant science journal publishing novel and rigorous research in all areas of plant science. It is published monthly in both electronic and printed forms with at least two extra issues each year that focus on a particular theme in plant biology. The Journal is managed by the Annals of Botany Company, a not-for-profit educational charity established to promote plant science worldwide.
The Journal publishes original research papers, invited and submitted review articles, ''Research in Context'' expanding on original work, ''Botanical Briefings'' as short overviews of important topics, and ''Viewpoints'' giving opinions. All papers in each issue are summarized briefly in Content Snapshots , there are topical news items in the Plant Cuttings section and Book Reviews . A rigorous review process ensures that readers are exposed to genuine and novel advances across a wide spectrum of botanical knowledge. All papers aim to advance knowledge and make a difference to our understanding of plant science.