The Levator Veli Palatini: Are all Segments Created Equal?

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1177/10556656241271666
Jamie L Perry, Taylor D Snodgrass, Imani R Gilbert, Jessica L Williams, Davinder J Singh, Thomas J Sitzman
{"title":"The Levator Veli Palatini: Are all Segments Created Equal?","authors":"Jamie L Perry, Taylor D Snodgrass, Imani R Gilbert, Jessica L Williams, Davinder J Singh, Thomas J Sitzman","doi":"10.1177/10556656241271666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The levator veli palatini (LVP) muscle has two segments with distinct roles in velopharyngeal function. Previous research suggests longer extravelar segments with shorter intravelar segments may lead to a more advantageous mechanism for velopharyngeal closure. The purpose of this study was to examine whether the distribution of the LVP intravelar and extravelar segments differs between children with cleft palate with and without VPI and controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 97 children: 37 with cleft palate +/- lip with VPI, 37 controls, and 19 with cleft palate with normal resonance. Measures included mean LVP length, mean extravelar LVP length, and intravelar LVP length.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall mean LVP length was similar (<i>P</i> = .267) between controls and children with cleft palate (with and without VPI). However, there was a significant difference (<i>P </i>< .001) between group for both intravelar and extravelar LVP lengths: the intravelar segment was significantly longer in those with VPI compared to controls and children with cleft palate and normal resonance; and the extravelar segment was significantly shorter in those with VPI compared to controls and children with cleft palate and normal resonance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results from this study demonstrate a significant difference between the distribution of the functional segments of the LVP among children with VPI, with a more disadvantageous distribution of the muscle segments among those with VPI.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241271666","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The levator veli palatini (LVP) muscle has two segments with distinct roles in velopharyngeal function. Previous research suggests longer extravelar segments with shorter intravelar segments may lead to a more advantageous mechanism for velopharyngeal closure. The purpose of this study was to examine whether the distribution of the LVP intravelar and extravelar segments differs between children with cleft palate with and without VPI and controls.

Methods: The study included 97 children: 37 with cleft palate +/- lip with VPI, 37 controls, and 19 with cleft palate with normal resonance. Measures included mean LVP length, mean extravelar LVP length, and intravelar LVP length.

Results: Overall mean LVP length was similar (P = .267) between controls and children with cleft palate (with and without VPI). However, there was a significant difference (P < .001) between group for both intravelar and extravelar LVP lengths: the intravelar segment was significantly longer in those with VPI compared to controls and children with cleft palate and normal resonance; and the extravelar segment was significantly shorter in those with VPI compared to controls and children with cleft palate and normal resonance.

Conclusions: Results from this study demonstrate a significant difference between the distribution of the functional segments of the LVP among children with VPI, with a more disadvantageous distribution of the muscle segments among those with VPI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髂胫束:所有部分都一样吗?
简介腭上提肌(LVP)有两个节段,在咽后功能中起着不同的作用。以前的研究表明,较长的瓣外肌节和较短的瓣内肌节可能会导致更有利的咽喉闭合机制。本研究的目的是探讨伴有或不伴有VPI的腭裂儿童与对照组儿童的LVP瓣内和瓣外节段的分布是否存在差异:研究包括 97 名儿童:方法:研究包括 97 名儿童:37 名腭裂+/-唇裂伴 VPI 儿童、37 名对照组儿童和 19 名腭裂伴正常共振儿童。测量指标包括平均LVP长度、平均侧外LVP长度和侧内LVP长度:结果:对照组和腭裂儿童(有 VPI 和无 VPI)的平均 LVP 长度总体相似(P = .267)。然而,对照组和腭裂患儿(有 VPI 和无 VPI)的平均 LVP 长度存在显著差异(P本研究结果表明,VPI 患儿的 LVP 功能节段分布存在显著差异,VPI 患儿的肌肉节段分布更为不利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
期刊最新文献
Caring for a Child with a Cleft Lip and/or Palate: A Narrative Review. Effect of Age and Gender on Nasalance Across the Lifespan: A Systematic Review. Expanding Accessibility in Cleft Care: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Literacy of Alveolar Bone Grafting Information. Postoperative Feeding in Cleft Surgery: A Systematic Review. Reduction Cranioplasty in Cases of Hydrocephalic Macrocephaly: Pearls and Pitfalls of Computer-Assisted Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1