Subsequent Memory Effects in Cortical Pattern Similarity Differ by Semantic Class

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1162/jocn_a_02238
Christina Yu;Shenyang Huang;Cortney M. Howard;Mariam Hovhannisyan;Alex Clarke;Roberto Cabeza;Simon W. Davis
{"title":"Subsequent Memory Effects in Cortical Pattern Similarity Differ by Semantic Class","authors":"Christina Yu;Shenyang Huang;Cortney M. Howard;Mariam Hovhannisyan;Alex Clarke;Roberto Cabeza;Simon W. Davis","doi":"10.1162/jocn_a_02238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although living and nonliving stimuli are known to rely on distinct brain regions during perception, it is largely unknown if their episodic memory encoding mechanisms differ as well. To investigate this issue, we asked participants to encode object pictures (e.g., a picture of a tiger) and to retrieve them later in response to their names (e.g., word “tiger”). For each of four semantic classes (living-animate, living-inanimate, nonliving-large, and nonliving-small), we examined differences in the similarity in activation patterns (neural pattern similarity [NPS]) for subsequently remembered versus forgotten items. Higher NPS for remembered items suggests an advantage of within-class item similarity, whereas lower NPS for remembered items indicates an advantage for item distinctiveness. We expect NPS within class-specific regions to be higher for remembered than for forgotten items. For example, the parahippocampal cortex has a well-known role in scene processing [Aminoff, E. M., Kveraga, K., & Bar, M. The role of the parahippocampal cortex in cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 379–390, 2013], and the anterior temporal and inferior frontal gyrus have well-known roles in object processing [Clarke, A., & Tyler, L. K. Object-specific semantic coding in human perirhinal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 4766–4775, 2014]. As such, we expect to see higher NPS for remembered items in these regions pertaining to scenes and objects, respectively. Consistent with this hypothesis, in fusiform, parahippocampal, and retrosplenial regions, higher NPS predicted memory for subclasses of nonliving objects, whereas in the left inferior frontal and left retrosplenial regions, lower NPS predicted memory for subclasses of living objects. Taken together, the results support the idea that subsequent memory depends on a balance of similarity and distinctiveness and demonstrate that the neural mechanisms of episodic encoding differ across semantic categories.","PeriodicalId":51081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":"37 1","pages":"155-166"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10824759/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although living and nonliving stimuli are known to rely on distinct brain regions during perception, it is largely unknown if their episodic memory encoding mechanisms differ as well. To investigate this issue, we asked participants to encode object pictures (e.g., a picture of a tiger) and to retrieve them later in response to their names (e.g., word “tiger”). For each of four semantic classes (living-animate, living-inanimate, nonliving-large, and nonliving-small), we examined differences in the similarity in activation patterns (neural pattern similarity [NPS]) for subsequently remembered versus forgotten items. Higher NPS for remembered items suggests an advantage of within-class item similarity, whereas lower NPS for remembered items indicates an advantage for item distinctiveness. We expect NPS within class-specific regions to be higher for remembered than for forgotten items. For example, the parahippocampal cortex has a well-known role in scene processing [Aminoff, E. M., Kveraga, K., & Bar, M. The role of the parahippocampal cortex in cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 379–390, 2013], and the anterior temporal and inferior frontal gyrus have well-known roles in object processing [Clarke, A., & Tyler, L. K. Object-specific semantic coding in human perirhinal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 4766–4775, 2014]. As such, we expect to see higher NPS for remembered items in these regions pertaining to scenes and objects, respectively. Consistent with this hypothesis, in fusiform, parahippocampal, and retrosplenial regions, higher NPS predicted memory for subclasses of nonliving objects, whereas in the left inferior frontal and left retrosplenial regions, lower NPS predicted memory for subclasses of living objects. Taken together, the results support the idea that subsequent memory depends on a balance of similarity and distinctiveness and demonstrate that the neural mechanisms of episodic encoding differ across semantic categories.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大脑皮层模式相似性的后续记忆效应因语义类别而异
众所周知,生物刺激和非生物刺激在感知过程中会依赖于不同的大脑区域,但它们的外显记忆编码机制是否也存在差异,这在很大程度上还是个未知数。为了研究这个问题,我们要求参与者对物体图片(如老虎的图片)进行编码,并在之后根据其名称(如单词 "老虎")对其进行检索。对于四种语义类别(活体-有生命的、活体-无生命的、非活体-大的和非活体-小的)中的每一种,我们都检查了随后记忆的项目与遗忘的项目在激活模式相似性(神经模式相似性 [NPS])上的差异。记忆项目的 NPS 越高,表明类内项目的相似性越好,而记忆项目的 NPS 越低,表明项目的独特性越好。我们预计,记忆项目在特定类别区域内的 NPS 会高于遗忘项目。例如,海马旁皮层在场景处理中的作用众所周知[Aminoff, E. M., Kveraga, K., & Bar, M. The role of the parahippocampal cortex in cognition.Clarke, A., & Tyler, L. K. Object-specific semantic coding in human perirhinal cortex.Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 4766-4775, 2014]。因此,我们预计在这些分别与场景和物体有关的区域中,记忆项目的 NPS 会更高。与这一假设一致的是,在纺锤体、海马旁和回脾区域,较高的NPS预示着对非生物物体子类的记忆,而在左下额叶和左回脾区域,较低的NPS预示着对生物物体子类的记忆。总之,这些结果支持了后续记忆取决于相似性和独特性之间平衡的观点,并证明了不同语义类别的外显编码神经机制是不同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
151
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience investigates brain–behavior interaction and promotes lively interchange among the mind sciences.
期刊最新文献
Task-dependent Modulation Masking of a 4-Hz Envelope Following Responses. Presenting Natural Continuous Speech in a Multisensory Immersive Environment Improves Speech Comprehension and Reflects the Allocation of Processing Resources in Neural Speech Tracking. EEG Decoding of Conscious versus Unconscious Representations during Binocular Rivalry. Exploring Dynamic Brain Oscillations in Motor Imagery and Low-frequency Sound. Salient, Unexpected Omissions of Sounds Can Involuntarily Distract Attention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1