Erin E Emery-Tiburcio, Laura Porter, Siqi Wang, Susan Buehler
{"title":"The 4Ms of an age-friendly health system in behavioral health: pilot test of an educational framework.","authors":"Erin E Emery-Tiburcio, Laura Porter, Siqi Wang, Susan Buehler","doi":"10.1080/13607863.2024.2389543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This pilot test of the 4Ms-Behavioral Health (4Ms-BH) training program was designed to assess knowledge gains, clinical behavior change, and acceptability among mental health clinicians and compile lessons to guide widespread implementation of the framework. The ultimate future goal is to improve care for older adults by expanding the 4Ms framework for behavioral health providers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Fifteen mental health clinicians from Community Mental Health Centers in three states completed eight hours of live session training over six months: one three-hour introduction followed by five monthly application sessions. Clinicians completed knowledge and clinical behavior measures before and after training, along with follow-up discussion regarding acceptability and sustainability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although knowledge gains were not significant in the overall 4Ms knowledge assessment, knowledge in the Medication and Mobility domains improved at 17% and 15%, respectively. Participants completing the program demonstrated an increased frequency of clinical behaviors pertinent to older adult care with large effect sizes in each of the 4Ms assessment and action activities from pre-training to post-training (Cohen's <i>d</i> range = 0.82 - 1.66, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 4Ms-BH framework was well-received by participants, who demonstrated some significant knowledge gains and clinical behavior change. These pilot data suggest that this framework has strong potential to effectively train mental health clinicians with little geriatric training.</p>","PeriodicalId":55546,"journal":{"name":"Aging & Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging & Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2024.2389543","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This pilot test of the 4Ms-Behavioral Health (4Ms-BH) training program was designed to assess knowledge gains, clinical behavior change, and acceptability among mental health clinicians and compile lessons to guide widespread implementation of the framework. The ultimate future goal is to improve care for older adults by expanding the 4Ms framework for behavioral health providers.
Method: Fifteen mental health clinicians from Community Mental Health Centers in three states completed eight hours of live session training over six months: one three-hour introduction followed by five monthly application sessions. Clinicians completed knowledge and clinical behavior measures before and after training, along with follow-up discussion regarding acceptability and sustainability.
Results: Although knowledge gains were not significant in the overall 4Ms knowledge assessment, knowledge in the Medication and Mobility domains improved at 17% and 15%, respectively. Participants completing the program demonstrated an increased frequency of clinical behaviors pertinent to older adult care with large effect sizes in each of the 4Ms assessment and action activities from pre-training to post-training (Cohen's d range = 0.82 - 1.66, p ≤ 0.01).
Conclusion: The 4Ms-BH framework was well-received by participants, who demonstrated some significant knowledge gains and clinical behavior change. These pilot data suggest that this framework has strong potential to effectively train mental health clinicians with little geriatric training.
期刊介绍:
Aging & Mental Health provides a leading international forum for the rapidly expanding field which investigates the relationship between the aging process and mental health. The journal addresses the mental changes associated with normal and abnormal or pathological aging, as well as the psychological and psychiatric problems of the aging population. The journal also has a strong commitment to interdisciplinary and innovative approaches that explore new topics and methods.
Aging & Mental Health covers the biological, psychological and social aspects of aging as they relate to mental health. In particular it encourages an integrated approach for examining various biopsychosocial processes and etiological factors associated with psychological changes in the elderly. It also emphasizes the various strategies, therapies and services which may be directed at improving the mental health of the elderly and their families. In this way the journal promotes a strong alliance among the theoretical, experimental and applied sciences across a range of issues affecting mental health and aging. The emphasis of the journal is on rigorous quantitative, and qualitative, research and, high quality innovative studies on emerging topics.