Comparison of central corneal thickness measured in myopic eyes by Pentacam, Sirius and IOLMaster 700

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy Pub Date : 2024-08-10 DOI:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2024.104302
Han Song , Chengyang Liu , Wei Yang , Chunliu Yang , Xiaodong Cheng
{"title":"Comparison of central corneal thickness measured in myopic eyes by Pentacam, Sirius and IOLMaster 700","authors":"Han Song ,&nbsp;Chengyang Liu ,&nbsp;Wei Yang ,&nbsp;Chunliu Yang ,&nbsp;Xiaodong Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.pdpdt.2024.104302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlations and consistency among the central corneal thickness (CCT) of healthy myopic patients measured with three different anterior segment analysis systems.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>This was a retrospective study. The study included myopia patients who had undergone preoperative examinations in the refractive surgery department of our hospital between January 2021 and December 2023. The CCT was measured separately using Pentacam, Sirius, and IOLMaster 700.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS software. Correlations among the three groups of measured values were assessed using the Pearson method, and a simple scatter plot and fitting line were drawn. Bland‒Altman scatter plots and 95 % limits of agreement (LoAs) were used to evaluate consistency in the data among the systems.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 269 patients participated in the study, including 134 males (49.8 %) and 135 females (50.2 %). The CCT measurements by Pentacam, Sirius, and IOLMaster 700 instruments were found to be 541.63 ± 31.67 μm, 541.74 ± 33.36 μm, and 548.90 ± 34.19 μm respectively; significant differences were observed among these measurements (<em>p &lt;</em> 0.05). Significant differences were also observed in CCT between Pentacam and IOLMaster 700 as well as between Sirius and IOLMaster 700 (<em>p &lt;</em> 0.05). The CCT measurements by all three devices showed high positive correlation with all <em>p</em> values less than 0.001: Pentacam and Sirius, <em>r</em> = 0.972; Pentacam and IOLMaster 700, <em>r</em> = 0.966; and Sirius and IOLMaster 700, <em>r</em> = 0.962. The respective 95 % LoAs were -0.18∼0.18; -1.51∼-1.11; and -1.52∼-1.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results indicate that there is a high correlation in measuring CCT for healthy myopic eyes using three different anterior segment analysis systems. However, the differences in the values measured by the three devices were statistically significant. Therefore, in actual clinical practice, it is suggested that the same device should be used to measure and evaluate the CCT across visits.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20141,"journal":{"name":"Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 104302"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1572100024003399/pdfft?md5=ce3ce962d1ce32c8d23745d294cc79c0&pid=1-s2.0-S1572100024003399-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1572100024003399","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlations and consistency among the central corneal thickness (CCT) of healthy myopic patients measured with three different anterior segment analysis systems.

Design

This was a retrospective study. The study included myopia patients who had undergone preoperative examinations in the refractive surgery department of our hospital between January 2021 and December 2023. The CCT was measured separately using Pentacam, Sirius, and IOLMaster 700.

Methods

Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS software. Correlations among the three groups of measured values were assessed using the Pearson method, and a simple scatter plot and fitting line were drawn. Bland‒Altman scatter plots and 95 % limits of agreement (LoAs) were used to evaluate consistency in the data among the systems.

Results

A total of 269 patients participated in the study, including 134 males (49.8 %) and 135 females (50.2 %). The CCT measurements by Pentacam, Sirius, and IOLMaster 700 instruments were found to be 541.63 ± 31.67 μm, 541.74 ± 33.36 μm, and 548.90 ± 34.19 μm respectively; significant differences were observed among these measurements (p < 0.05). Significant differences were also observed in CCT between Pentacam and IOLMaster 700 as well as between Sirius and IOLMaster 700 (p < 0.05). The CCT measurements by all three devices showed high positive correlation with all p values less than 0.001: Pentacam and Sirius, r = 0.972; Pentacam and IOLMaster 700, r = 0.966; and Sirius and IOLMaster 700, r = 0.962. The respective 95 % LoAs were -0.18∼0.18; -1.51∼-1.11; and -1.52∼-1.

Conclusion

The results indicate that there is a high correlation in measuring CCT for healthy myopic eyes using three different anterior segment analysis systems. However, the differences in the values measured by the three devices were statistically significant. Therefore, in actual clinical practice, it is suggested that the same device should be used to measure and evaluate the CCT across visits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用 Pentacam、Sirius 和 IOLMaster 700 测量近视眼中央角膜厚度的比较。
目的:本研究旨在评估用三种不同的眼前节分析系统测量的健康近视患者中央角膜厚度(CCT)之间的相关性和一致性:这是一项回顾性研究。研究对象包括 2021 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月期间在我院屈光手术科接受术前检查的近视患者。分别使用 Pentacam、Sirius 和 IOLMaster 700 测量 CCT:使用 SPSS 软件进行统计分析。使用皮尔逊法评估三组测量值之间的相关性,并绘制简单的散点图和拟合线。使用Bland-Altman散点图和95%一致性限值(LoAs)来评估各系统数据的一致性:共有 269 名患者参与了研究,其中男性 134 名(占 49.8%),女性 135 名(占 50.2%)。Pentacam、Sirius 和 IOLMaster 700 仪器的 CCT 测量值分别为 541.63±31.67μm、541.74±33.36μm 和 548.90±34.19μm;这些测量值之间存在显著差异(pConclusion):结果表明,使用三种不同的眼前节分析系统测量健康近视眼的 CCT 具有高度相关性。然而,三种设备测量值的差异在统计学上具有显著性。因此,在实际临床实践中,建议使用相同的设备来测量和评估各次检查的 CCT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.20%
发文量
509
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy is an international journal for the dissemination of scientific knowledge and clinical developments of Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy in all medical specialties. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, case presentations, "how-to-do-it" articles, Letters to the Editor, short communications and relevant images with short descriptions. All submitted material is subject to a strict peer-review process.
期刊最新文献
Photodynamic therapy for early and recurrent oral cancers and pre-malignant lesions. Need of the hour for India Diagnostic model of microvasculature and neurologic alterations in the retina and optic disc for lupus nephritis Distribution and morphologic characteristics of choroidal vortex veins in Pachychoroid disease Correlation between repeated low-level red light-induced afterimage and axial changes in myopia control The ability of changes in oct angiography values to predict visual field and retinal nerve layer tomography progression in patients with glaucoma progression: A prospective study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1