Hygiene performance rating at farm level - an auditing scheme for evaluation of biosecurity measures' effect on prevalence of Campylobacter from selected broiler producers.

IF 1.9 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1186/s13028-024-00762-w
Gunvor Elise Nagel-Alne, Ole-Johan Røtterud, Thorbjørn Refsum, Janne Holthe, Miriam Garner, Eystein Skjerve, Sigrun J Hauge
{"title":"Hygiene performance rating at farm level - an auditing scheme for evaluation of biosecurity measures' effect on prevalence of Campylobacter from selected broiler producers.","authors":"Gunvor Elise Nagel-Alne, Ole-Johan Røtterud, Thorbjørn Refsum, Janne Holthe, Miriam Garner, Eystein Skjerve, Sigrun J Hauge","doi":"10.1186/s13028-024-00762-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preventing pathogens from entering the broiler premises is the main biosecurity measure at farm level. In conventional broiler production, chickens are kept indoors during the entire production period. Pathogens can enter the broiler-producing unit from sources such as water, equipment, personnel, insects, and rodents. The possible routes must be controlled, and corrective measures applied when necessary. The objective of this study was to (1) develop a hygiene protocol and test the scheme on 30 farms, and (2) compare the results to their Campylobacter-colonised status. A Hygiene Performance Rating protocol at farm level (HPR-F) was developed to systematically review the production to identify risk areas to biosecurity. The HPR-F consists of 13 categories with related questions. For each question, a score was given from 1 to 3, where 1 meant \"acceptable\", 2 was \"potential for improvements\", and 3 was \"not acceptable\". Scores for each question were multiplied with weight factors for hygienic impact and economic consequences describing whether the necessary improvement depends on a significant investment or is a cheap quick-fix and calculated into a percentage where 100% is perfect hygiene. The 30 farms in the study were selected from one county in Norway. The Campylobacter-results for each of the 30 farms in 2019-2021 were given according to rules in the Norwegian Action Plan against Campylobacter faecal sampling on-farm 3-6 days prior to slaughter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall results from the HPR-F showed that the general hygiene level was high in all farms. The mean total hygiene score was 82% and varied from 70 to 92%. The category Handling dead chicken had the highest hygiene score (93%), and Ventilation had the lowest score (55%). The HPR-F results were compared to the Campylobacter-status for the 30 farms: Campylobacter-negative flocks had slightly higher total scores than Campylobacter-positive flocks (P = 0.19). Among others, the category Outdoor area (vegetation close to the premises' walls) was identified as the most stable factor in relation to be colonised with Campylobacter.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HPR-F tested in this research trial provides a tool for veterinarians, advisors, and poultry farmers to improve biosecurity at farm level and enhance the preventive animal health initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":7181,"journal":{"name":"Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica","volume":"66 1","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11323344/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-024-00762-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preventing pathogens from entering the broiler premises is the main biosecurity measure at farm level. In conventional broiler production, chickens are kept indoors during the entire production period. Pathogens can enter the broiler-producing unit from sources such as water, equipment, personnel, insects, and rodents. The possible routes must be controlled, and corrective measures applied when necessary. The objective of this study was to (1) develop a hygiene protocol and test the scheme on 30 farms, and (2) compare the results to their Campylobacter-colonised status. A Hygiene Performance Rating protocol at farm level (HPR-F) was developed to systematically review the production to identify risk areas to biosecurity. The HPR-F consists of 13 categories with related questions. For each question, a score was given from 1 to 3, where 1 meant "acceptable", 2 was "potential for improvements", and 3 was "not acceptable". Scores for each question were multiplied with weight factors for hygienic impact and economic consequences describing whether the necessary improvement depends on a significant investment or is a cheap quick-fix and calculated into a percentage where 100% is perfect hygiene. The 30 farms in the study were selected from one county in Norway. The Campylobacter-results for each of the 30 farms in 2019-2021 were given according to rules in the Norwegian Action Plan against Campylobacter faecal sampling on-farm 3-6 days prior to slaughter.

Results: The overall results from the HPR-F showed that the general hygiene level was high in all farms. The mean total hygiene score was 82% and varied from 70 to 92%. The category Handling dead chicken had the highest hygiene score (93%), and Ventilation had the lowest score (55%). The HPR-F results were compared to the Campylobacter-status for the 30 farms: Campylobacter-negative flocks had slightly higher total scores than Campylobacter-positive flocks (P = 0.19). Among others, the category Outdoor area (vegetation close to the premises' walls) was identified as the most stable factor in relation to be colonised with Campylobacter.

Conclusions: The HPR-F tested in this research trial provides a tool for veterinarians, advisors, and poultry farmers to improve biosecurity at farm level and enhance the preventive animal health initiatives.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农场一级的卫生表现评级--用于评估生物安全措施对选定肉鸡生产商弯曲杆菌流行率影响的审计计划。
背景:防止病原体进入肉鸡饲养场所是农场一级的主要生物安全措施。在传统肉鸡生产中,鸡在整个生产期间都在室内饲养。病原体可通过水、设备、人员、昆虫和啮齿动物等途径进入肉鸡生产单元。必须控制可能的途径,并在必要时采取纠正措施。本研究的目的是:(1) 制定卫生规程,并在 30 个农场进行测试;(2) 将测试结果与农场的弯曲杆菌感染状况进行比较。制定了农场一级的卫生表现评级协议(HPR-F),以系统地审查生产情况,确定生物安全的风险领域。HPR-F 包括 13 个类别及相关问题。每个问题的得分从 1 到 3 分不等,其中 1 分表示 "可接受",2 分表示 "有改进潜力",3 分表示 "不可接受"。每个问题的得分都乘以卫生影响和经济后果的权重系数,说明必要的改进是需要大量投资还是廉价的速效方法,然后计算出一个百分比,100% 代表完全卫生。研究中的 30 家农场选自挪威的一个郡。根据《挪威防治弯曲杆菌行动计划》的规定,在屠宰前 3-6 天在农场进行粪便采样,得出这 30 个农场在 2019-2021 年的弯曲杆菌检测结果:HPR-F 的总体结果显示,所有农场的总体卫生水平较高。平均总卫生分数为 82%,从 70%到 92%不等。处理死鸡类别的卫生得分最高(93%),通风得分最低(55%)。将 HPR-F 结果与 30 个农场的弯曲菌状况进行了比较:弯曲菌阴性鸡群的总分略高于弯曲菌阳性鸡群(P = 0.19)。其中,户外区域(靠近房舍墙壁的植被)类别被认为是与弯曲菌定植相关的最稳定因素:本研究试验中测试的 HPR-F 为兽医、顾问和家禽养殖户提供了一种工具,可用于改善农场生物安全并加强预防性动物保健措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica is an open access journal encompassing all aspects of veterinary research and medicine of domestic and wild animals.
期刊最新文献
Pasteurella multocida from deep nasal swabs and tracheobronchial lavage in bovine calves from Sweden. Correction to: Investigation of side effects to treatment and cause of death in 63 Scandinavian dogs suffering from meningoencephalitis of unknown origin: a retrospective study. Sedation and general anaesthesia of crocodilians: a systematic review. Isolated and multiple causes of equine dystocia. Predominance of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli among ESBL/plasmid-mediated AmpC-producing strains isolated from diarrheic foals: a public health concern.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1