Multinational Analysis of Marginal Liver Grafts Based on the Eurotransplant Extended Donor Criteria.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Annals of surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006491
Simon Moosburner, Madhukar S Patel, Benjamin K Wang, Jai Prasadh, Robert Öllinger, Georg Lurje, Igor M Sauer, Parsia A Vagefi, Johann Pratschke, Nathanael Raschzok
{"title":"Multinational Analysis of Marginal Liver Grafts Based on the Eurotransplant Extended Donor Criteria.","authors":"Simon Moosburner, Madhukar S Patel, Benjamin K Wang, Jai Prasadh, Robert Öllinger, Georg Lurje, Igor M Sauer, Parsia A Vagefi, Johann Pratschke, Nathanael Raschzok","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the outcome of marginal liver grafts based on the Eurotransplant extended criteria donor (ECD) criteria.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Eurotransplant uses a broad definition of ECD criteria (age >65 years, steatosis >40%, body mass index >30 kg/m 2 , intensive care unit stay >7 days, donation after circulatory death, and certain laboratory parameters) for allocating organs to recipients who have consented to marginal grafts. Historically, marginal liver grafts were associated with increased rates of dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort analysis using the German Transplant Registry and the U.S. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) from 2006 to 2016. Results were validated with recent SRTR data (2017-2022). Donors were classified according to the Eurotransplant ECD criteria, donation after circulatory death was excluded. Data were analyzed with cutoff prediction, binomial logistic regression, and multivariate Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study analyzed 92,330 deceased brain-dead donors (87% SRTR) and 70,374 transplants (87% SRTR) in adult recipients. Predominant ECD factors were donor age in Germany (30%) and body mass index in the United States (28%). Except for donor age, grafts meeting ECD criteria were not associated with impaired 1 or 3-year survival. Cutoffs had little to no predictive value for 30-day graft survival (area under the receiver operating curve: 0.49-0.52) and were nominally higher for age (72 vs 65 years) in Germany as compared with those defined by current Eurotransplant criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The outcome of transplanted grafts from higher risk donors was nearly equal to standard donors with Eurotransplant criteria failing to predict survival of marginal grafts. Modifying ECD criteria could improve graft allocation and potentially expand the donor pool.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006491","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the outcome of marginal liver grafts based on the Eurotransplant extended criteria donor (ECD) criteria.

Background: Eurotransplant uses a broad definition of ECD criteria (age >65 years, steatosis >40%, body mass index >30 kg/m 2 , intensive care unit stay >7 days, donation after circulatory death, and certain laboratory parameters) for allocating organs to recipients who have consented to marginal grafts. Historically, marginal liver grafts were associated with increased rates of dysfunction.

Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis using the German Transplant Registry and the U.S. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) from 2006 to 2016. Results were validated with recent SRTR data (2017-2022). Donors were classified according to the Eurotransplant ECD criteria, donation after circulatory death was excluded. Data were analyzed with cutoff prediction, binomial logistic regression, and multivariate Cox regression.

Results: The study analyzed 92,330 deceased brain-dead donors (87% SRTR) and 70,374 transplants (87% SRTR) in adult recipients. Predominant ECD factors were donor age in Germany (30%) and body mass index in the United States (28%). Except for donor age, grafts meeting ECD criteria were not associated with impaired 1 or 3-year survival. Cutoffs had little to no predictive value for 30-day graft survival (area under the receiver operating curve: 0.49-0.52) and were nominally higher for age (72 vs 65 years) in Germany as compared with those defined by current Eurotransplant criteria.

Conclusions: The outcome of transplanted grafts from higher risk donors was nearly equal to standard donors with Eurotransplant criteria failing to predict survival of marginal grafts. Modifying ECD criteria could improve graft allocation and potentially expand the donor pool.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于欧洲移植扩展捐献者标准的边缘肝移植跨国分析。
目的:根据欧洲移植扩展供体标准(ECD)评估边缘肝脏移植的效果:根据欧洲器官移植扩展供体标准(ECD)评估边缘肝脏移植的结果:欧洲移植组织采用广义的 ECD 标准(年龄大于 65 岁、脂肪变性大于 40%、体重指数大于 30 kg/m2、重症监护室住院时间大于 7 天、DCD 和某些实验室参数)为同意边缘移植的受者分配器官。从历史上看,边缘肝脏移植与功能障碍发生率增加有关:方法:利用德国移植登记处(GTR)和美国移植受者科学登记处(SRTR)2006-2016年的数据进行回顾性队列分析。结果与最近的 SRTR 数据(2017-2022 年)进行了验证。捐献者根据欧洲器官移植 ECD 标准进行分类,DCD 被排除在外。数据采用截断预测、二项式逻辑回归和多变量考克斯回归进行分析:研究分析了 92,330 例死亡脑死亡供体(87% SRTR)和 70,374 例成人受体移植(87% SRTR)。ECD的主要因素是德国的供体年龄(30%)和美国的体重指数(28%)。除供体年龄外,符合 ECD 标准的移植物与 1 年或 3 年存活率下降无关。截断值对 30 天移植物存活率几乎没有预测价值(AUROC 0.49 - 0.52),与目前欧洲移植标准所定义的截断值相比,德国的截断值对年龄的预测价值更高(72 岁对 65 岁):结论:来自高风险供体的移植物移植结果几乎与标准供体相同,欧洲移植标准无法预测边缘移植物的存活率。修改ECD标准可以改善移植物的分配,并有可能扩大供体库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
期刊最新文献
The Association Between Pediatric Readiness and Mortality for Injured Children Treated at US Trauma Centers. The Role of Adjuvant Therapy in Duodenal Adenocarcinoma and Intestinal Subtype Ampullary Carcinoma After Curative Resection. Association of Prophylactic Antibiotics With Early Infectious Complications in Children With Cancer Undergoing Central Venous Access Device Placement. Cure Probabilities After Resection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Multi-Institutional Analysis of 2554 Patients. Pancreatic Cancer: An Exocrine Tumor With Endocrine Characteristics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1