Machine Learning Accurately Predicts Patient-Reported Outcomes 1 Year After Breast Reconstruction.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Annals of surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006688
Jonlin Chen, Ariel Gabay, Lillian A Boe, Ronnie L Shammas, Carrie Stern, Andrea Pusic, Babak J Mehrara, Chris Gibbons, Jonas A Nelson
{"title":"Machine Learning Accurately Predicts Patient-Reported Outcomes 1 Year After Breast Reconstruction.","authors":"Jonlin Chen, Ariel Gabay, Lillian A Boe, Ronnie L Shammas, Carrie Stern, Andrea Pusic, Babak J Mehrara, Chris Gibbons, Jonas A Nelson","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and evaluate machine learning algorithms for predicting patient-reported outcomes following breast reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Machine learning may inform PROs in breast reconstruction, possibly enhancing shared decision-making and tailoring patient care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on patient characteristics, reconstructive technique, and BREAST-Q scores from women undergoing breast reconstruction at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) between January 2010 and March 2024 was retrospectively collected. Five machine learning algorithms were developed and validated on this data to predict improved versus not improved BREAST-Q scores after reconstruction. Models were externally validated models using multicenter data from the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium (MROC). Models were evaluated using the area under the receiver operator curve, sensitivity, specificity, and Brier score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4,776 patients (2,687 from MSKCC, 2,089 from MROC) were included in model development and validation. Machine learning algorithms demonstrated AUCs of 0.97 for physical wellbeing of the abdomen, 0.86 for satisfaction with breast, 0.79 for sexual wellbeing, 0.78 for physical wellbeing of the chest, and 0.74 for psychosocial wellbeing. Variables that contributed the most to model predictions across all domains were preoperative BREAST-Q scores, timing of radiation, BMI, age, and reconstructive technique.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine learning algorithms can accurately predict PROs before breast reconstruction. Ultimately, this data-driven approach may streamline shared decision-making and enhance patient-centered care.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006688","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop and evaluate machine learning algorithms for predicting patient-reported outcomes following breast reconstruction.

Summary of background data: Machine learning may inform PROs in breast reconstruction, possibly enhancing shared decision-making and tailoring patient care.

Methods: Data on patient characteristics, reconstructive technique, and BREAST-Q scores from women undergoing breast reconstruction at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) between January 2010 and March 2024 was retrospectively collected. Five machine learning algorithms were developed and validated on this data to predict improved versus not improved BREAST-Q scores after reconstruction. Models were externally validated models using multicenter data from the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium (MROC). Models were evaluated using the area under the receiver operator curve, sensitivity, specificity, and Brier score.

Results: A total of 4,776 patients (2,687 from MSKCC, 2,089 from MROC) were included in model development and validation. Machine learning algorithms demonstrated AUCs of 0.97 for physical wellbeing of the abdomen, 0.86 for satisfaction with breast, 0.79 for sexual wellbeing, 0.78 for physical wellbeing of the chest, and 0.74 for psychosocial wellbeing. Variables that contributed the most to model predictions across all domains were preoperative BREAST-Q scores, timing of radiation, BMI, age, and reconstructive technique.

Conclusions: Machine learning algorithms can accurately predict PROs before breast reconstruction. Ultimately, this data-driven approach may streamline shared decision-making and enhance patient-centered care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
期刊最新文献
Acquired Nonmalignant Tracheoesophageal Fistula: Changing Causes and Surgical Methods Over 40 Years. Surgery for Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer with Arterial Encasement after Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Single-center Experience. A Multicenter Assessment of the Accuracy of Claims Data in Appendicitis Research. Machine Learning Accurately Predicts Patient-Reported Outcomes 1 Year After Breast Reconstruction. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm-derived Pancreatic Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1